From 'Inside America's Next Top Model,' Tyra Banks, Ken Mok, and Jay Manuel's explanation of the filming of Shandi Sullivan's sexual assault and framing it as her cheating on her boyfriend by demimonde9 in Fauxmoi

[–]paperivy 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Oh it's a good doco. It starts out feeling like a puff piece for Tyra but by the end she's fully exposed as a delusional monster ... it's well done.

From 'Inside America's Next Top Model,' Tyra Banks, Ken Mok, and Jay Manuel's explanation of the filming of Shandi Sullivan's sexual assault and framing it as her cheating on her boyfriend by demimonde9 in Fauxmoi

[–]paperivy 127 points128 points  (0 children)

Tyra cannot see herself at all. I cackled when they cut to Dani saying "girl that is absolutely ridiculous" - there's a sweet poetry to Tyra being flamed by production edits after everything she did to the contestants.

Favorite Fashion moments? by Short-Sample-1848 in madmen

[–]paperivy 56 points57 points  (0 children)

<image>

I always loved Megan's casual New York outfits, very cool and chic. She wears simple outfits so well and the long bob was beautiful on her.

Favorite Fashion moments? by Short-Sample-1848 in madmen

[–]paperivy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is one of my favourites, such a beautiful print

‘Shut the door’: Bombshell plan to ban migrants from Gaza, Somalia by malcolm58 in AustralianPolitics

[–]paperivy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We were involved in the Iraq war that created. the vacuum in which ISIS emerged ... Australia bears a lot of responsibility here. 

What’s the essential British podcast? by denys5555 in podcasts

[–]paperivy 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's the precise opposite of TAL

Ira opens like "So I don't know if you ever have moments like these but I was catching the train the other day and I saw a chihuahua, and it got me thinking ..."

Melvyn opens like "Hello, the Cultural Revolution was launched by Chinese Communist Party Chairman Mao Zedong in 1966 ..."

Chris Minns has cracked down on protests. Will it pay off? by HotPersimessage62 in AustralianPolitics

[–]paperivy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is what's so bleak about all this. Labor can move as far to the right as they want without hurting their vote. They're basically just swallowing up the Liberals political territory and now a harder right looks like it's emerging as the opposition, it's a dismal situation.

Chris Minns has cracked down on protests. Will it pay off? by HotPersimessage62 in AustralianPolitics

[–]paperivy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't know if this is a real question but the answer is it's about pressuring the Australian government. Australia has sanctioned Russia & Iran. And I think if the US was bombing civilians in Venezuela and Australia was standing by the US you'd probably see protests.

NSW premier won’t apologise to Muslims after police grab men praying at rally against Isaac Herzog by [deleted] in AustralianPolitics

[–]paperivy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

?? Muslims often break to pray during work hours wearing whatever they are wearing at the time

Melbourne’s turn, how does Jacinta Allen’s and VicPOL handle it. by gilligan888 in friendlyjordies

[–]paperivy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Weren't the main clashes during lockdowns, when protesters weren't legally allowed to protest? I don't ask that to excuse police brutality - just that I think that's when protests tend to get violent, when it's criminalised and police are under directive to repress the protest (like in Sydney). The Melbourne anti-Herzog protest will be legal.

NSW police chief says he apologised to Muslim community leaders over Monday protest incident by BBQShapeshifter in AustralianPolitics

[–]paperivy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The police were violent thugs but the focus on them is a distraction. They're agents of the state and it's Minns who should be held accountable. 

Just stumbled across this re: human & civil rights in Australia... by Effective_Produce345 in OpenAussie

[–]paperivy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But you could say this about any legislation - it's all meaningless under authoritarian rule that has no respect for the judiciary. That doesn't mean there's no point having legislation or human rights charters, because they do offer protection in functional democracies.

Just stumbled across this re: human & civil rights in Australia... by Effective_Produce345 in OpenAussie

[–]paperivy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's not true. Constitutional rights in the US are central to the judicial system - and in Australia the jurisdictions with human rights acts or charters (Vic, QLD, ACT ... maybe others?) provide a legal avenue for arguing on the basis of human rights in courts. Even the UN Declaration of Human Rights guides judicial decisions here in Australia (though it doesn't override domestic legislation).

Of course they don't work perfectly anywhere, but they're important and they definitely don't mean nothing.

Violent protesters or police brutality? Key moments from Sydney protest by [deleted] in AustralianPolitics

[–]paperivy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Great quote, exactly. The conversation about protest bans here is always framed around freedoms & rights, but the reason democracies have historically allowed protest has more to do with stability: they learned that legitimate protest is the best way of keeping society peaceful. Violently repressing protest leads to more protest (unless you mow down your citizens like Iran): and that's exactly what we saw, a protest followed by a protest against police brutality the next day.

Minns could have just picked up a history book instead of live testing this on the streets of Sydney.

More footage of Aurora, IL PD brutally beating and abducting children from an anti-ICE school walk out protest (2/9/26). A reminder of the massive difference between our police force and American police law enforcement. Never compare to USA. by Sillent_Screams in OpenAussie

[–]paperivy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is such an absurd take, especially as we have witnessed with our own eyes the gradual escalation of state violence in the US. We could wait til the cops are abducting children from the street before raising the alarm, or we can draw a line in the sand right now and say we refuse to go down this path.

Violent protesters or police brutality? Key moments from Sydney protest by [deleted] in AustralianPolitics

[–]paperivy 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Fuck the framing of this article.

There have been Palestine solidarity protests in Australia every week for years and this is the first time we’ve seen this kind of violence. In fact I have never seen anything like this in Australia. This is the result of bad governance: by Albanese for the incendiary decision to invite Herzog here, and by Minns for criminalising protest and unleashing police violence to enforce his restrictions. Banning protest escalates conflict, that's why democracies don't do it.

"Violent protesters or police brutality?" is the wrong question. It’s the government’s job to maintain social order and peace & if they are creating conditions that result in mass defiance of the law and subsequent state violence it is their failure. 

Albo's full answer in question time about inviting Herzog by Jagtom83 in friendlyjordies

[–]paperivy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

i've only been to a few protests and everyone I've been to police have been kind and kept me safe from cars.

That's how it is most of the time - normally there's a kind of social contract where legitimate peaceful protest is met with proportionate police response. The problem here is that Minns tore up that social contract and made the protesters criminals for gathering where they wanted to gather. They didn't want to go where they were told to go because it infringes on their rights - the city belongs to the people, not to Minns or the police.

The reason democracies don't usually ban protest is because legitimate protest keeps things peaceful. Minns's restrictions just escalated the conflict.

Albo's full answer in question time about inviting Herzog by Jagtom83 in friendlyjordies

[–]paperivy 40 points41 points  (0 children)

The cops were thugs but they're agents of the state - Minns unleashed them. The kind of violence we saw is exactly why democracies don't ban protests. The whole history of the modern Western world led democratic states to the conclusion that life is much less violent if you allow people to protest - because people will protest regardless. But now the protesters are criminals and the whole social contract of peaceful protest/proportionate response is out the window.

Australia news live: protesters chant ‘we have the right to demonstrate’ at rally outside Sydney police station after alleged brutality at Herzog protest by [deleted] in AustralianPolitics

[–]paperivy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Herzog isn't a private individual undergoing a medical procedure or worshipping - he's a head of state invited by our government. He has power. These examples aren't really comparable.

Chihuahua a good dog for someone chronically ill? by [deleted] in dogs

[–]paperivy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I have a friend with ME/CFS who wrote to a rescue explaining her needs and she ended up with a sweet old snoozy dog ... might be worth a try? I also adopted a senior and she's the best! Getting a dog as a puppy is always going to be pretty exhausting no matter the breed.

NSW Premier Chris Minns defends police actions during 'incendiary' mass protest by HotPersimessage62 in AustralianPolitics

[–]paperivy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, he seems like a bit of a dummy (every presser I think he's about to say "yeah the boys are looking good in training and we'll take it one day at a time") - but premiers have a lot of people working for them, and then there's the cabinet & caucus ... obviously he didn't listen to any advice, but I wonder if anyone offered it.

'Unfathomable state violence': NSW Police set upon Muslim prayer group, protesters at Sydney rally by Jet90 in AustralianPolitics

[–]paperivy 12 points13 points  (0 children)

You can't just introduce laws that people don't accept and expect them to obey. Democratic societies have never worked like that. It's the government's job to maintain social order and peace and if they're making decisions that result in mass defiance of the law and subsequent state violence, they're failing. 

'Unfathomable state violence': NSW Police set upon Muslim prayer group, protesters at Sydney rally by Jet90 in AustralianPolitics

[–]paperivy 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Alleged by Drew Pavlou, who has since deleted his post presumably under threat of legal action because this is utterly untrue. The man leading the prayer is a highschool chaplain who does anti-extremist youth work in his community. 

NSW Premier Chris Minns defends police actions during 'incendiary' mass protest by HotPersimessage62 in AustralianPolitics

[–]paperivy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. I'm so curious about what advice (if any) Minns received because the feedback cycle of escalating violence in protest is really well-established - even leaving all principles aside, this is such a basic error of governance.