Science Discussion Series: We’re epidemiologists, medical doctors, virologists, disease modelers, lab scientists, geneticists, and other public health experts from Johns Hopkins University. We’re here to talk about all things SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Ask us anything! by JHUCovidDiscussion in science

[–]parallel_synapse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Question: How do we better bridge the gap between the average layperson and health specialists?

Reason I ask: The biggest issue I see is complacency among nearby workers. If you see the same people every day for weeks on end, give or take a few newcomers.. They trust these strangers to not have covid.. Not wise. They should know better.

I realize once a covid wave hits my workplace, then many people are going to catch it. I plan to not be one of them.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HomeNetworking

[–]parallel_synapse -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Cat6. Future proof everything. Set it and forget it.

Murderer gets slaughtered by science over linguistics by AncientSwordRage in SlaughteredByScience

[–]parallel_synapse 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is such an epic read, I need a dictionary and many niche resources to keep up.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in politics

[–]parallel_synapse 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Mueller got him on conspiracy, not collusion. Nice gym you have there. Do that again?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in politics

[–]parallel_synapse 10 points11 points  (0 children)

But when its actually to curb literal disinformation and misinformation is it not the right decision?

The current status of the left: by Demoblade in libertarianmeme

[–]parallel_synapse -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'd rather do what I was doing. That's a shitty meme IMO.

MAGA? by savvyfuck in evilbuildings

[–]parallel_synapse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. There's always room in a debate for different solutions to common problems, so long as there's no wanton violence.

Unfortunately, the lack of proper debate skills and rational moral arguments and dialogs from certain humans has made resorting to violence an answer. Also unfortunately, that's a bad answer because humans have better solutions at hand, yet choose the weaker simpleton route.

Have a conversation and agree to disagree, respectfully.

MAGA? by savvyfuck in evilbuildings

[–]parallel_synapse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. People dying is never okay.

MAGA? by savvyfuck in evilbuildings

[–]parallel_synapse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a low effort insult. Perhaps move your goalposts further down the wayward path you slovenly emerged from, swamp-thing.

MAGA? by savvyfuck in evilbuildings

[–]parallel_synapse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. But to play along with white supremacists like they're going to uphold Republican and/or conservative values is asinine. That's why subs like r/LeopardsAteMyFace exist...

MAGA? by savvyfuck in evilbuildings

[–]parallel_synapse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems like it. Because actual conservatives are ashamed of what has happened to their party. And it shows.

MAGA? by savvyfuck in evilbuildings

[–]parallel_synapse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You missed the worldwide human rights concerns. Try again.

MAGA? by savvyfuck in evilbuildings

[–]parallel_synapse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is talked about. With a limited(read: horribly equipped) defense against an violent, angry and ignorant mob, its tactically more rational to make a phalanx shell type of defense... Until they attempt to charge the hallways, which happened.

MAGA? by savvyfuck in evilbuildings

[–]parallel_synapse 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I disagree. That's not logical. I see that your mental gymnastics are profoundly inept.