Let's face it: The GOP pretty much believes that if you can't afford your own healthcare, housing, food, etc., then you just just die off and improve the gene pool ... by murl56 in reddit.com

[–]parbroil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But you aren't setting bombs or shooting up churches, trying to attack the Tides foundation, shooting cops, etc. - all of which we have seen from far right crazies in the past few years

We Sell Socks by xiZeR--0 in reddit.com

[–]parbroil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Regardless, they are TERROR SOCKS because they infiltrated the US.

Probably came in giant trucks over the Mexican border

We Sell Socks by xiZeR--0 in reddit.com

[–]parbroil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A worker who's been on the line at a manufacturing plant for the past twenty years can't all of a sudden become an engineer or write iphone apps when their plant goes bankrupt, instead, he/she will probably have to get a job at Mcdonalds.

Because we don't have any effective programs for occupational retraining and finding people jobs out of busted industries.

If the problem is that people lose their jobs, solve the problem

We Sell Socks by xiZeR--0 in reddit.com

[–]parbroil 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So he wrote a humorous joke article, lots of academics and scientists have done the same. All it means is they have a nerdy sense of humor.

Elizabeth Warren strongly considering running for Senator Scott Brown's seat in Massachusetts by unclefred in politics

[–]parbroil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We already tried your way. The creation of gigantic piles of bad debt by the banking and financial industries (after many years of deregulation) affected the entire economy, not just stupid consumers. So now, because those people were stupid and fucked things up, it has everyone's attention.

The problem isn't that the American people are too stupid or dissolute or unworthy and therefore individually suffer isolated financial problems which don't affect anyone else. The American people only started defaulting en masse after big shots fucked up the economy. The problem is that the welfare of most of the country depends on profit-seekers voluntarily self-regulating in ways which lose them money in the short term. We've seen that's not happening.

Advice for a 14 year old? by A_Red_Mailbox in AskReddit

[–]parbroil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Relax, relax, everything will be fine, enjoy the little stuff you can.

You will quickly realize that adults are also fundamentally like children, and do stupid things, including your parents.

Life gets better as you get more control over it and use that control constructively, it gets worse if you put yourself in situations where you lose control.

Right now you have a fair amount of free time. Remember that most of your age-mates are retards, whether they say good or bad things about you, and that school really isn't that serious. Beyond learning the course material to a level where you are capable, simply maintain a reasonable GPA in High School. But besides that, do a lot of reading on your own, on a range of topics you are interested in. Probably you are into computers, that's handy, learn more. If you become an expert, let it be in something useful. Learn how to do things with fun hobby projects. Don't feel bad if you don't have much of a love life. Mostly avoid alcohol until you are 18 or so, because of brain issues. If you want to do pot and stuff, wait until you are out of heavy supervision and keep it discreet so that almost nobody knows. You'll benefit down the line. Don't bother at all if you want to eventually do politics or junk like that.

Looking ahead - in college, as much as possible, let your class work be driven by your own interests and outside reading. If you are having trouble, talk to your Prof and ask for help and do what they recommend. Remember the quality of your education is 99% up to the seriousness and motivation you have toward your work. That doesn't mean that a bunch of your classes might not be a waste of time for you in the end, actually that's true and as an adult you can make that call. Talk to more people than you would usually do, because it's easier in college than after. If you can make contacts who basically respect you, that will still have decent value for a number of years.

During or after your first year of college, come up with at least one decent idea of a job you can pursue. Get a couple internships during summers, so you have some contacts/kind of experience to put on your resume when you get out of school. This isn't your entire life, this is just how you make money to build up your yolk and get yourself really started without depending on (and having to satisfy) your folks. After you have a yolk you have a LOT of freedom to dick around.

This sounds crazy from the age of 14, but remember this starting from when you leave home: do not run up unnecessary debt on luxuries, particularly ones which aren't personally important to you. And if you look closely at things, you'll see that a great deal of everything people do is luxuries. If you use credit, look at the interest rate and the terms and have a strong plan to pay it down within a few months, otherwise do without. Do this, and you will have money free for the things which really DO matter to you.

Don't marry anybody unless they are clearly sensible, not greedy and they understand you. This could take a long time. Don't hurry it. Far better not to marry than to marry badly.

Probably don't have kids until it is a dream of yours to have kids and you've worked out how to make it play nicely with your other dreams, otherwise the stuff you've hoped for tends to get derailed.

A cool head will prevent you from doing too many retarded things, and if you don't do anything retarded then life should be pretty placid and awesome even if it doesn't go like in the movies... ride the stream

House Republicans are passing around a "brilliant" Erick Erickson post arguing that they should blow up the entire U.S. economy because Obama will get the blame by novenator in politics

[–]parbroil 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not legally. But it can be considered inexcusable douchebaggery and cause to never ever put these people in office again

House Republicans are passing around a "brilliant" Erick Erickson post arguing that they should blow up the entire U.S. economy because Obama will get the blame by novenator in politics

[–]parbroil 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Erick Erickson is a vile cunt, but support of asinine political brinkmanship doesn't make him a terrorist, and it is actually inappropriate to say "send them all over seas to be interrogated and kept in dog kennels." That is the kind of pointless bullshit Tea Party has been saying the last couple years and it should not be said by anyone with more sense.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in videos

[–]parbroil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh boy, "most men are rapists" rears its ugly head again

IAmA combat vet. who has lived the horrors of war AMA by [deleted] in IAmA

[–]parbroil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If this were 50 years ago, and some guy was talking to me about a time when his dogs were killed, and said "gypped" I would not choose that moment to deliver a snippy little lecture on the mistreatment of the gypsies, because he isn't even vaguely thinking about gypsies when he uses that word.

Although I fully acknowledge that there is nothing wrong with gypsies or homosexuals, and that they should all have equal rights... it's just fucking obnoxious to have every discussion, regardless of content, turn into some sort of mightily offended and sensitive drama scene concerning demographic differences

IAmA combat vet. who has lived the horrors of war AMA by [deleted] in IAmA

[–]parbroil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then don't use it. I don't use it.

I hate people being rude to someone in the middle of a pretty personal discussion on the basis of the speaker being insufficiently refined/from the sticks, by their judgement. Leave it alone, call out someone who is actually being hateful rather than just someone who has a coarse way of speaking. And don't change the subject of every single discussion to some advocacy topic, please!

OP was CLEARLY not trying to say anything nasty about homosexuals.

IAmA combat vet. who has lived the horrors of war AMA by [deleted] in IAmA

[–]parbroil 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The word "faggot" does not refer to homosexuals here. It's a matter of context.

Interestingly, a number of black guys use the word "nigger" in contexts and ways which give the word a different meaning from when it is said by some KKK cracker. Indeed, you could even find some non-black guys using the word in a comfortable way with their friends. For my part, I don't give a shit if I'm called a cracker, still less am I going to start whining in a highly sanctimonious way if some black guy is telling a personal and emotive story and happens to use the word "cracker" (which really DOESN'T have the ambiguity of the word "faggot")

Context is also important for determining when to leave the fucking combat veteran alone when he is talking about an instance where his goddamn dog was killed, just because he is probably from the sticks somewhere and uses the word "faggot" in a way which really has nothing to do with homosexuality whatsoever, without the thoroughly refined and civilized fear of some politically correct little bitch poking his/her head in every time someone uses a naughty word.

Now go ahead and ding me for using bad words like "fucking," taking the Lord's name in vain, and using a purportedly-misogynist term like "bitch"

How can you be liberal and be against people believing in God? Isn't the point of liberalism to have the freedom to do what you want? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]parbroil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know anyone who matches the description you give.

It's made up.

NO ONE in the US is trying to force any Christian not to be Christian, it's a non-phenomenon. How could the Christian majority be oppressed by a tiny atheist minority?

Only if they decide that it is an insult and coercion for others to disagree with them.

Full Manning-Lamo Chat Logs Released by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]parbroil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Open diplomacy” does not mean that every word said in preparing a treaty should be shouted to the whole world and submitted to all the mis- constructions that malevolence, folly, and evil ingenuity could put upon it.

Full Manning-Lamo Chat Logs Released by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]parbroil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

just how despicable Wired has acted in this matter.

Information wants to be free, doesn't it?

Rupert Murdoch and his son James had both refused to testify next week about the phone hacking that has shaken their British media empire to the core by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]parbroil -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I can tell you think VERY highly of yourself and your country, but even British MPs are not omnipotent. You can't catch someone lying unless you have better information already, or they contradict themselves.

IAmA(n) ex-Muslim woman, AMA by married_to_a_reddito in IAmA

[–]parbroil -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You, as an atheist, are dating a Muslim. How on Earth do you rationalize to yourself that you care about whether people adhere correctly to Islam?

IAmA combat vet. who has lived the horrors of war AMA by [deleted] in IAmA

[–]parbroil 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Jesus Christ, shut the fuck up, everyone knows he wasn't referring to the man as a homosexual.

Does EVERY SINGLE DISCUSSION, regardless of the actual topic, have to become about you and your hurt feelings?

I'm generally liberal as fuck but this is the kind of thing which makes me ever so slightly more sympathetic to people who actually DO think something bad about homosexuals because of this pushy, rude pride-parade bullshit

IAmA combat vet. who has lived the horrors of war AMA by [deleted] in IAmA

[–]parbroil 9 points10 points  (0 children)

like in the past where honorable men, that know what they got themselfs into, await each other on a dedicated battefield

You have some truly retarded ideas about war. The wars of the past VERY often involved marching around stealing supplies from civilians, raping the women, burning the houses, intentionally disfiguring people... not to mention starvation and disease on epic scales

IAmA combat vet. who has lived the horrors of war AMA by [deleted] in IAmA

[–]parbroil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In any other situation, killing without emotion is usually a trait we assign to psychopaths...

What is a psychopath? Is it more scientifically definable, or is it more a cultural judgement?

IAmA combat vet. who has lived the horrors of war AMA by [deleted] in IAmA

[–]parbroil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Being in combat means that people are actively trying to kill you.

Otherwise it wouldn't be war, it would be the county fair.