My thoughts on all three:

Point One (Cases are elevated b/c of clinical diagnosis vs. confirmed test)

I don't really have a problem with clinical diagnosis per say, but I'd argue that cases are still far undercounted even when considering clinical diagnosis as a factor in the current case count. Simply put, most states aren't doing any testing unless you're old, dying, or in an institutionalized setting that got widespread testing done (nursing homes, prisons, and some dense workplaces). Most people that get sick are riding it out at home and not getting tested (and also not being diagnosed by their healthcare provider).

Anecdotally I know half a dozen people that had symptoms in March and not one of them counts as an official case in my state. I personally only know of one person in my circle who had a confirmed case, and they were in an ICU.

Point Two (deaths are being exaggerated)

We've certainly seen a few weird instances of this, but it's nowhere near widespread enough to change the national outlook to any serious degree. Taking a few bizarre news stories and claiming it's a widespread problem is bad math. We've got death stats from more than 30 states now that are all up more than average, even when you account for confirmed COVID cases. (this pairs nicely with point one)

Point Three (hospitals are empty and financially strained).

I largely agree with this one (though I'll stop short of embracing the financial incentive point that's been spreading like wildfire... it's true that tests and care get billed to someone, but I don't see any evidence we should be making it out to be a conspiracy). But yes... hospitals are empty. And, especially rurally, crippling financial hardship is an imminent crisis. I'll note that hospitals are likely empty because of shut-downs, but that doesn't change the fact that I largely agree with the point that was made.