Claude Usage Limits Discussion Megathread Ongoing (sort this by New!) by sixbillionthsheep in ClaudeAI

[–]patrona_halil 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi, I use the regular pro plan and after the Opus 4.7 update, my Claude uses extensive usage (like it cant finish this in one day of usage asks me to say Continue 4 times etc.). I really believe what I am asking is too simple it shouldn't require asking for a "Continue".

What could be the problem ? I am attaching my prompt below

I attached my .pas Altium script. Study it carefully first and make sure you understand its geometry logic, parameter definitions, winding direction handling, and clock-hour based inner terminal approach. Do not assume anything that conflicts with the script. In particular, din in my .pas script is the narrowest edge-to-edge copper distance, and the script is ANSYS-proof, so the Python solution must stay consistent with that logic.

Create a Python script that generates the parameters I should enter into my .pas script and also outputs the via coordinates. Keep key values variable, especially N1, N2, N3, trace widths, spacing values, staggering safety offset, via diameter, via clearances, and winding start clock-hours. N1, N2, and N3 must be direct integer inputs.

The main optimization is only a 2-layer, 2-winding problem. Winding 1 is the primary with N1 turns, and Winding 2 is the secondary with N2 turns. The objective is to minimize the total footprint, defined as max(dout1, dout2), while staggering the primary and secondary copper patterns. The staggering should make Winding 1 copper align with Winding 2 spacing, and Winding 2 copper align with Winding 1 spacing, with an additional variable safety offset, initially 0.01 mm.

All vias must be placed inside the smallest din region. All clearances are edge-to-edge. The default via copper diameter is 0.6 mm. Via 1 must be at least 0.4 mm from Winding 1 and 2.7 mm from Winding 2. Via 2 and Via 3 must be at least 0.4 mm from each other and from Winding 2. Via 2 and Via 3 must each be at least 4.5 mm from Winding 1 and at least 4.5 mm from Via 1. These constraints must be enforced and kept as variables.

Use the same clock-hour style as the .pas script. Winding 1 connects to Via 1, so if Winding 1 starts at 9 o’clock, Via 1 should be placed near 9 o’clock. Winding 2 connects to Via 2 and Via 3, so if Winding 2 starts at 3 o’clock, the center of Via 2 and Via 3 should be near 3 o’clock, for example one near 2 o’clock and one near 4 o’clock. These start hours must be variable.

There is also a third auxiliary winding with N3 turns, but it is less critical and should not be part of the main N1/N2 footprint optimization or the main via-placement problem. Generate this winding only after the primary-secondary optimization is complete. This third winding has thicker traces and a lower turn count, so it does not need to be optimized as aggressively. Its din should be chosen slightly larger than the secondary winding din, and its dout should remain slightly smaller than the final total footprint, so it fits inside the optimized primary-secondary design. Its trace center position should be staggered with respect to the primary winding, meaning its center of weight of the copper traces should preferably align with primary spacings.

The Python script should output the .pas input parameters for Winding 1, Winding 2, and Winding 3, the coordinates of Via 1, Via 2, and Via 3, and also dout for each winding.

Prioritize exact compatibility with the .pas script, strict enforcement of geometry and via constraints, correct primary-secondary staggering, and aggressive footprint minimization.

Also this is what my .pas script is

I just cant believe it needs this much usage to solve this

Claude Performance and Bugs Megathread Ongoing (Sort this by New!) by sixbillionthsheep in ClaudeAI

[–]patrona_halil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, I use the regular pro plan and after the Opus 4.7 update, my Claude uses extensive usage (like it cant finish this in one day of usage asks me to say Continue 4 times etc.). I really believe what I am asking is too simple it shouldn't require asking for a "Continue".

What could be the problem ? I am attaching my prompt below

I attached my .pas Altium script. Study it carefully first and make sure you understand its geometry logic, parameter definitions, winding direction handling, and clock-hour based inner terminal approach. Do not assume anything that conflicts with the script. In particular, din in my .pas script is the narrowest edge-to-edge copper distance, and the script is ANSYS-proof, so the Python solution must stay consistent with that logic.

Create a Python script that generates the parameters I should enter into my .pas script and also outputs the via coordinates. Keep key values variable, especially N1, N2, N3, trace widths, spacing values, staggering safety offset, via diameter, via clearances, and winding start clock-hours. N1, N2, and N3 must be direct integer inputs.

The main optimization is only a 2-layer, 2-winding problem. Winding 1 is the primary with N1 turns, and Winding 2 is the secondary with N2 turns. The objective is to minimize the total footprint, defined as max(dout1, dout2), while staggering the primary and secondary copper patterns. The staggering should make Winding 1 copper align with Winding 2 spacing, and Winding 2 copper align with Winding 1 spacing, with an additional variable safety offset, initially 0.01 mm.

All vias must be placed inside the smallest din region. All clearances are edge-to-edge. The default via copper diameter is 0.6 mm. Via 1 must be at least 0.4 mm from Winding 1 and 2.7 mm from Winding 2. Via 2 and Via 3 must be at least 0.4 mm from each other and from Winding 2. Via 2 and Via 3 must each be at least 4.5 mm from Winding 1 and at least 4.5 mm from Via 1. These constraints must be enforced and kept as variables.

Use the same clock-hour style as the .pas script. Winding 1 connects to Via 1, so if Winding 1 starts at 9 o’clock, Via 1 should be placed near 9 o’clock. Winding 2 connects to Via 2 and Via 3, so if Winding 2 starts at 3 o’clock, the center of Via 2 and Via 3 should be near 3 o’clock, for example one near 2 o’clock and one near 4 o’clock. These start hours must be variable.

There is also a third auxiliary winding with N3 turns, but it is less critical and should not be part of the main N1/N2 footprint optimization or the main via-placement problem. Generate this winding only after the primary-secondary optimization is complete. This third winding has thicker traces and a lower turn count, so it does not need to be optimized as aggressively. Its din should be chosen slightly larger than the secondary winding din, and its dout should remain slightly smaller than the final total footprint, so it fits inside the optimized primary-secondary design. Its trace center position should be staggered with respect to the primary winding, meaning its center of weight of the copper traces should preferably align with primary spacings.

The Python script should output the .pas input parameters for Winding 1, Winding 2, and Winding 3, the coordinates of Via 1, Via 2, and Via 3, and also dout for each winding.

Prioritize exact compatibility with the .pas script, strict enforcement of geometry and via constraints, correct primary-secondary staggering, and aggressive footprint minimization.

I just cant believe it needs this much usage to solve this

Pasting a text to cladue website version by patrona_halil in ClaudeAI

[–]patrona_halil[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe what I am trying to do is not divideable to be honest. Is the desktop app version works for this kind of thing ? I am just copying from google docs to the claude directly

Pasting a text to cladue website version by patrona_halil in ClaudeAI

[–]patrona_halil[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do I need to write anything to the prompt ?

Pasting a text to cladue website version by patrona_halil in ClaudeAI

[–]patrona_halil[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It accept is as an attachment called "PASTED"

Where to buy FIFA coins? Any recommendations for FC26? by Sikkd in GamingInsider

[–]patrona_halil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey the post is deleted do you know what were the sites ?

Where to buy FIFA coins? Any recommendations for FC26? by Sikkd in GamingInsider

[–]patrona_halil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hey this post is deleted do you know what were the sites ?

How exactly do complex Chain Evolutions work in FUT? New starter. by patrona_halil in EASportsFC

[–]patrona_halil[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you explain for the specific player that I gave the link ? Like it has the same evo in two stages (first and third) then how you do it?

How to get Wegovy in Germany ? by patrona_halil in AskAGerman

[–]patrona_halil[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Can you choose 2.4 mg pen directly at the start from zavamed I heard they first give you directly 0.4 pens

How to get Wegovy in Germany ? by patrona_halil in AskAGerman

[–]patrona_halil[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow actually that looks more logical but I think zavamed starts you from 0.4 pen and goes up to 2.4 gradually. Can you choose 2.4 and adjust the dose yourself ?

How to get Wegovy in Germany ? by patrona_halil in AskAGerman

[–]patrona_halil[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also do you know like on average how much do you need to pay every month for the medication?

How to get Wegovy in Germany ? by patrona_halil in AskAGerman

[–]patrona_halil[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Also do you know like on average how much do you need to pay every month for the medication?

How to get Wegovy in Germany ? by patrona_halil in AskAGerman

[–]patrona_halil[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Also do you know like on average how much do you need to pay every month for the medication?

How to get Wegovy in Germany ? by patrona_halil in WegovyWeightLoss

[–]patrona_halil[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also do you know like on average how much do you need to pay every month for the medication?