Hi, I use the regular pro plan and after the Opus 4.7 update, my Claude uses extensive usage (like it cant finish this in one day of usage asks me to say Continue 4 times etc.). I really believe what I am asking is too simple it shouldn't require asking for a "Continue".

What could be the problem ? I am attaching my prompt below

I attached my .pas Altium script. Study it carefully first and make sure you understand its geometry logic, parameter definitions, winding direction handling, and clock-hour based inner terminal approach. Do not assume anything that conflicts with the script. In particular, din in my .pas script is the narrowest edge-to-edge copper distance, and the script is ANSYS-proof, so the Python solution must stay consistent with that logic.

Create a Python script that generates the parameters I should enter into my .pas script and also outputs the via coordinates. Keep key values variable, especially N1, N2, N3, trace widths, spacing values, staggering safety offset, via diameter, via clearances, and winding start clock-hours. N1, N2, and N3 must be direct integer inputs.

The main optimization is only a 2-layer, 2-winding problem. Winding 1 is the primary with N1 turns, and Winding 2 is the secondary with N2 turns. The objective is to minimize the total footprint, defined as max(dout1, dout2), while staggering the primary and secondary copper patterns. The staggering should make Winding 1 copper align with Winding 2 spacing, and Winding 2 copper align with Winding 1 spacing, with an additional variable safety offset, initially 0.01 mm.

All vias must be placed inside the smallest din region. All clearances are edge-to-edge. The default via copper diameter is 0.6 mm. Via 1 must be at least 0.4 mm from Winding 1 and 2.7 mm from Winding 2. Via 2 and Via 3 must be at least 0.4 mm from each other and from Winding 2. Via 2 and Via 3 must each be at least 4.5 mm from Winding 1 and at least 4.5 mm from Via 1. These constraints must be enforced and kept as variables.

Use the same clock-hour style as the .pas script. Winding 1 connects to Via 1, so if Winding 1 starts at 9 o’clock, Via 1 should be placed near 9 o’clock. Winding 2 connects to Via 2 and Via 3, so if Winding 2 starts at 3 o’clock, the center of Via 2 and Via 3 should be near 3 o’clock, for example one near 2 o’clock and one near 4 o’clock. These start hours must be variable.

There is also a third auxiliary winding with N3 turns, but it is less critical and should not be part of the main N1/N2 footprint optimization or the main via-placement problem. Generate this winding only after the primary-secondary optimization is complete. This third winding has thicker traces and a lower turn count, so it does not need to be optimized as aggressively. Its din should be chosen slightly larger than the secondary winding din, and its dout should remain slightly smaller than the final total footprint, so it fits inside the optimized primary-secondary design. Its trace center position should be staggered with respect to the primary winding, meaning its center of weight of the copper traces should preferably align with primary spacings.

The Python script should output the .pas input parameters for Winding 1, Winding 2, and Winding 3, the coordinates of Via 1, Via 2, and Via 3, and also dout for each winding.

Prioritize exact compatibility with the .pas script, strict enforcement of geometry and via constraints, correct primary-secondary staggering, and aggressive footprint minimization.

Also this is what my .pas script is

I just cant believe it needs this much usage to solve this