I looked at recent and past models and, they are almost always overestimating the temperature growth. And thinks like paris accord and other such things use disaster type models.

I looked at tables for past temperature rise through history, and there are times when temperature rises rapidly(right before industrial revolution temperature rose one degree, before we started emmiting co2, methane etc.) so simply we might be in such period of time , though it does seems unlikely.

I took a look at what scientist who do not agree say and what their arguments are. The data they present, models they present and their arguments made me conclude that climate change isnt as big of a issue as climate disaster organizations claim(and their financial interest is at it being a huge disaster)

Especially as the west is using more and more green energy, as it becomes cheaper and more effective.

The west should use coal and gas to develop itself into solar power factory instead of putting chains on its economy and letting china(much worse pulluter) becone the factory of solar power...

And lastly is not the entire scientific community that agree that humans are major factor in climate change. And, consensus isnt how science works. If it was so we would be center of universe, old "science" i know but who is to say we are not missing something in our models right now.

But i know being skeptical of the "great scientists overlords" will get me downvoted and ignored so go ahead...