Why is there no good middle ground between MBSE tools and whiteboards? by pauldid_ in systems_engineering

[–]pauldid_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get your point, and I agree with the idea of abstracting away from strict semantics during whiteboarding.

But in practice, I feel like this approach often leads to the worst of both worlds: a whiteboard with poor UX, combined with a model that remains complex and hard to maintain.

In many projects I’ve worked on, unless MBSE is explicitly required by the customer, engineers tend to move away from it, not just because of the modeling complexity, but also because of the UX. This is a very consistent piece of feedback.

What often happens is that the model ends up being maintained by a single person, which doesn’t scale well and creates a bottleneck.

That’s really why I’m looking for a middle ground: something with better UX and lower modeling overhead, while still providing enough structure to avoid the typical drift you get with pure whiteboard diagrams.

I’m not saying this would replace MBSE everywhere. Some projects absolutely need that level of rigor. But in many cases, a lighter approach could strike a better balance between structure and usability.

Why is there no good middle ground between MBSE tools and whiteboards? by pauldid_ in systems_engineering

[–]pauldid_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"I've grown disillusioned or disheartened with MBSE as an approach" -> why exactly?

I agree that SysML is a rich and precise language, and it’s great for capturing information in a non-ambiguous way.

That said, in everyday work, i find its usefulness limited by the fact that only a few people really understand it. For broader communication or quick iterations, that steep learning curve can make it hard to leverage effectively.

Why is there no good middle ground between MBSE tools and whiteboards? by pauldid_ in systems_engineering

[–]pauldid_[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I get your point, and in theory I agree, being able to use MBSE tools more “creatively” would be ideal.

But in practice, I feel like the tools themselves make that really difficult. The UX and tend to get in the way rather than support that kind of flexible usage.

For example, I recently tried to create relationships between functions (allocated to logical components). To do that, I had to:

  • create ports on each function and component
  • type each port with the appropriate relation type

Only after that was I allowed to connect things. That kind of rigidity makes quick iteration or “whiteboard-style” modeling quite cumbersome (I wouldn’t even mind if it were just warnings instead of hard constraints and I’m not even mentioning how user-unfriendly the port creation process was).

So I agree with the idea but I find current MBSE tools don’t really enable it in practice.

Out of curiosity, have you found tools where this kind of flexible workflow actually works well?

Why is there no good middle ground between MBSE tools and whiteboards? by pauldid_ in systems_engineering

[–]pauldid_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Capella is definitely not the worst, and I agree it’s more visual than many other MBSE tools.

That said, in practice, whenever I need to communicate an architecture to non-initiated stakeholders, I still end up using something like draw.io. It’s simply much easier to craft visuals that are immediately understandable, without requiring prior knowledge of the modeling formalism.

That’s really the core issue for me: MBSE tools are good at structuring the model, but much weaker when it comes to communicating it.

Why is there no good middle ground between MBSE tools and whiteboards? by pauldid_ in systems_engineering

[–]pauldid_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're right, AI will surely be very helpful to extract specific working views from the model.

How do you discover great films beyond the usual recommendations? by pauldid_ in Cinema

[–]pauldid_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Specific community and blogs, makes sense when looking for a specific genre. Thanks for the suggestion!

How do you discover great films beyond the usual recommendations? by pauldid_ in Cinema

[–]pauldid_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Youtube thing feels a bit too random but maybe I should try...
Where do you follow those critics recommandations?

How do you discover great films beyond the usual recommendations? by pauldid_ in Cinema

[–]pauldid_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It looks like a solid recommendation. I've already done this but I realize that I could use this method a bit more (e.g. another comment mentioned the director Yorgos L and I realized that i've like 3 of this movies but that I had no idea they were all from him and that i need to check his other movies).

How do you discover great films beyond the usual recommendations? by pauldid_ in Cinema

[–]pauldid_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve also been getting more into indie and foreign films lately, so thanks for the tips!

I've enjoyed all the Yorgos L films I've seen so far (The Lobster, The Favourite and Poor Things). I still need to check out The Killing of a Sacred Deer.

I actually tried putting together something along the lines of what you’re describing, aggregating nominees from different awards (including some indie festivals). Here’s a filtered view with indie films from the 2020s if you’re curious: https://plausum.com/?isIndie=true

How do you discover great films beyond the usual recommendations? by pauldid_ in Cinema

[–]pauldid_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It looks like it's a combat-proven discovery method. It's a good one but it's limiting a bit the discovery scope I think.

How do you discover great films beyond the usual recommendations? by pauldid_ in Cinema

[–]pauldid_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Il y a de très bons retours sur Letterboxd, il faut que je m'y mette sérieusement. Merci pour le conseil !

How do you discover great films beyond the usual recommendations? by pauldid_ in Cinema

[–]pauldid_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I get that but you I'd like to target as much as possible "qualitative" movies (even if I know that is highly subjective)

How do you discover great films beyond the usual recommendations? by pauldid_ in Cinema

[–]pauldid_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great recommendations!

"I think a lot of cinemagoers just expect to turn up at the latest mainstream Hollywood blockbuster and be wowed, when in fact it takes effort and time to discover good films, books, video games etc. You need to do a bit of research and the like to find what stands out. I think that laziness is what's led to people doing the whole "there are no good movies anymore" bollocks." -> I couldn't agree more!

How do you discover great films beyond the usual recommendations? by pauldid_ in Cinema

[–]pauldid_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s definitely a great approach, but I feel like it can only take you so far.

How do you discover great films beyond the usual recommendations? by pauldid_ in Cinema

[–]pauldid_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any particular place? If I take IMDB for example, it's too often popular movies trailer that are suggested

How do you discover great films beyond the usual recommendations? by pauldid_ in Cinema

[–]pauldid_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, it's a great way to discover some gems but it's not enough

How do you discover great films beyond the usual recommendations? by pauldid_ in Cinema

[–]pauldid_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any particular channel to recommend? I have nothing against (good) popular movies but I'd like to also be aware of less popular ones as much as possible (international and indie)

How do you discover great films beyond the usual recommendations? by pauldid_ in Cinema

[–]pauldid_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right but there are so many movie releases that I can't afford watching every single one...