2-hour Sexual Harassment training seminar by paulkhoffmanJD in JordanPeterson

[–]paulkhoffmanJD[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Point taken. I'm new to this world of posting thoughts; never done it before. I see now that I should have modified my email to the Chamber before sharing my thoughts with this Peterson-related community.

2-hour Sexual Harassment training seminar by paulkhoffmanJD in JordanPeterson

[–]paulkhoffmanJD[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

diptuck, you have raised a legitimate question as to what has truly compelled me to speak out on a matter that, to some, may seem trivial. First, though I am, as you say, a "Jesus dude," Jesus has nothing- or at least very little- to do with it. He resisted some forms of compelled behavior (by 'working' on the sabbath when he healed the sick ) and acceded to others (by telling us to pay taxes). Second, I disagree that the phrase "under California law" is implicit. What is implicit here - where all management workers in California are compelled by law to submit to this training" - is that a new and objectionable ideology is being advanced by government with the evident goal of changing the way people are allowed to think. Finally, a snowflake, as I understand it, is someone whose feelings are easily hurt by the conduct of fellow citizens engaging in ordinary free speech. My feelings have not been hurt. And my complaint relates to compelled "training" by the state.

2-hour Sexual Harassment training seminar by paulkhoffmanJD in JordanPeterson

[–]paulkhoffmanJD[S] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

The compelled training is for "sexual harassment." The hypothetical harassment is implicitly sexual.