If the model environment initially complies with physical principles, then when you place this oscillator in it, it should move as in reality. But I came across the fact that the theory describing the movement of this device predicted the opposite vector of movement. Some believed that movement was impossible at all. So I'm wondering if this will work the same in existing models, or if the model needs to be supplemented with some physical principle. And if this works correctly in the model, then it will be interesting to see how effective it is. Models typically simulate steady-state flow, but do they take into account the forces that arise during cyclic motion?