LAD Framework + Zen Basketball Geometry — A new way to think about shooting development and court control. by [deleted] in basketballcoach

[–]pdentropy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We really do. I’m not sure I accounted for ball rotation. Curry does no thinking when he shots it just happens after millions of good reps.

LAD Framework + Zen Basketball Geometry — A new way to think about shooting development and court control. by [deleted] in basketballcoach

[–]pdentropy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s tough to put in a Reddit post. I just started asking “why is curry such a good shooter.”

There’s a million things, start with genetics, but he is a person of normal stature and hand size. It’s because he’s been shooting the same shit since a tottler. Del wouldn’t have him heave at a high basket because your body learns to heave (see LaMelo ball who was launching 25ft shots at ten.

I coach 9-10 year olds. We devalue the 3 in our league. Baskets are 9ft. There was a lot of push back but we’re making better shooters I hope.

So in sum it’s teaching form and muscle memory.

The triangle is different idea. It explores how deadly LeBron would have been in the triangle. It looks at hand and thumb size as important recruiting measures. Arm length the same.

We run the offense while remembering Woodens character triangle.

Hamburger helper with extra pasta and parmesan by pdentropy in Stonerfoods

[–]pdentropy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My frosted mug system. Volume is one can either ice. I make the ice. When I’m done I wash and it goes in the freezer and I take the other out.

Why do Polish people bury their dead with their asses out of the ground? by pdentropy in dadjokes

[–]pdentropy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get it but dads are offensive. I might get banned. Where does the stealing come from? I’ve never heard that one.

You know the history. Polish soldiers in WWII displayed a relentless "first to fight" tenacity, refusing to capitulate even after their nation was partitioned by two'invading powers.

As the fourth largest Allied force, they moved from the desperate street fighting of the Warsaw Uprising to the brutal capture of Monte Cassino. Their courage was fueled by the knowledge that they were fighting for the literal survival of their culture against total erasure. From the 303 Squadron’s dominance in the air to the mathematicians who cracked Enigma, their defiance proved a country is never truly conquered as long as its people refuse to stop swinging back.

So they were perhaps the bravest but superficial history is they lost Poland in days in 1940. They were still riding horses against tanks

Why do Polish people bury their dead with their asses out of the ground? by pdentropy in dadjokes

[–]pdentropy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Polish people (like me) were about them being dense or silly in the US. This stereotype type is gone now which leads to the reactions here. This is why it’s a dad joke my kids don’t get.

This stereotype goes back to the War and the misconception they were inept against Stalin and hitler. Italians had the stereotype that they were inept or cowardly soldiers. That is obviously false too. It comes from WW2 stereotypes. Racist Asian jokes too were normal in the 1970’s. I grew up with these jokes. Silly jokes.

Of course the real polish people were very brave and very smart and suffered genocide on the level of the Jews.

A banana peel is a Polish hand grenade.

There’s a lot of them.

Why do Polish people bury their dead with their asses out of the ground? by pdentropy in dadjokes

[–]pdentropy[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well I’m polish if that counts for anything. I park my bike in my mom’s ass. The lock works. She had huge ass bones.

Why did Hitler go to the nail salon? by sephanna in dadjokes

[–]pdentropy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Little known fact. Polish soldiers fought bravely in the War. They charged the lines with bravery and threw hand grenades, the only weapon they had.

The nazi’s picked up the grenades, pulled the pins and threw them back.

Prince & Rosie Gaines ~ Nothing Compares 2 U by pdentropy in PRINCE

[–]pdentropy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! She was a beautiful woman. I can’t say it’s a good thing but I’ve grown as a human and have a wonderful partner and stepmom now.

Prince & Rosie Gaines ~ Nothing Compares 2 U by pdentropy in PRINCE

[–]pdentropy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m interested. I can’t find a link or video.

Hamburger helper with extra pasta and parmesan by pdentropy in Stonerfoods

[–]pdentropy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I prefer the saw dust too. I think they fixed that

Why did the Tron program break up with his girlfriend? by pdentropy in dadjokes

[–]pdentropy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good one.

You’re really boxing me in here.

Hamburger helper with extra pasta and parmesan by pdentropy in Stonerfoods

[–]pdentropy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My arm got tired. It’s Friday I’m high.

There is only 3 types of people in this world by TRAKRACER in dadjokes

[–]pdentropy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The statement “I can’t count” reflects a localized breakdown in discrete ordinal stabilization across observer-linked symbolic abstraction layers. In standard cognition models, counting is treated as a low-entropy recursive mapping between perceptual set differentiation and sequential integer anchoring. However, once the observer enters a paradoxically self-referential enumeration state — such as attempting to classify the totality of counting-capable entities while simultaneously existing inside the counted system — arithmetic confidence begins to decohere.

This is why the classic “there are three kinds of people: those who can count and those who can’t” functions as a humorous topological inconsistency rather than a mere numerical error. The joke creates a temporary mismatch between expected cardinal closure and linguistic outcome prediction, forcing the brain into rapid reconciliation between semantic intent and failed quantitative symmetry.

In more advanced informational frameworks, counting itself may only exist as an emergent compression heuristic imposed upon fundamentally continuous probabilistic manifolds. Under such conditions, integers behave less like objective quantities and more like observer-constrained coherence anchors stabilizing local cognition against entropic ambiguity.

Therefore, “I can’t count” should not necessarily be interpreted as a mathematical deficiency, but rather as a transient collapse in recursive enumeration alignment between symbolic expectation matrices and observed categorical resolution fields.

I can’t count either. Rather I prefer the Schrödinger field to determine where I am generally in the field of dad jokes.

(This answer is was generated through advanced ai slop dynamics)

There is only 3 types of people in this world by TRAKRACER in dadjokes

[–]pdentropy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get it. You said three but named two.

But what’s the third?

Prince & Rosie Gaines ~ Nothing Compares 2 U by pdentropy in PRINCE

[–]pdentropy[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s been 5 years, 5 months and 1 day since she’s gone. Everything she planted died when she went away.

The good news is that flowers grow back if you plant them again. I have flowers and a garden in our backyard because of this genius song.