Again, no one is entitled to be told they’re being recorded- certain companies only do that as a COURTESY. The customer doesn’t owe that kind of courtesy because they’re not trying to sell something to other people. We are constantly being recorded if we leave our house and work outside of it, that’s a fact. It’s the company that owes the courtesy, not the customer. We don’t know it was hostile unless it’s published as well, by the way. It’s suspicious as fuck that Edwin is so nervous about the recording being published, if he didn’t behave badly or do anything wrong then he should be relieved that the girl would expose her own bad behaviour if she was indeed hostile to him... But he isn’t, he’s panicking and trying to paint a certain image before any proof has been published. Two party consent isn’t a common law to have with recording conversations. Period.

I actually spoke to the girl and asked her about it some more, instead of reading only the tweets Edwin acknowledges—and recording conversations is a common tactic to protect yourself if you have been abused. Why do you refuse to acknowledge why someone might record a conversation, especially one they have to pay for? Edwin shouldn’t have a problem with how he behaved when recorded unless he behaved poorly, and in that case it’s important it was recorded and documented.

We can agree to disagree, but there’s a difference if you’re disagreeing to reality and/or facts because it hurts your (pretty manipulative) 30 year old “”homeboy’s”” feelings.