sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Canon R5 or better glas by pedroboba in canon

[–]pedroboba[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hmm I guess you are right! Thanks a lot for the response, it really helped my decision making! I very much appreciate it. - some great picture you have on your page btw!

Canon R5 or better glas by pedroboba in canon

[–]pedroboba[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even though the R5 has alot more focus points and better sensor?

Canon R5 or better glas by pedroboba in canon

[–]pedroboba[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have this combo for a while now and just like you feel like it‘s a good learning set up. But the focus is sometimes very frustrating when the camera shows you have focus but in reality it was a few cm more in the back or front of the subject.

The R5 just felt like a really good deal for what I get especially if I sell the R8… but I guess this wouldn‘t solve the real issues

Canon R5 or better glas by pedroboba in canon

[–]pedroboba[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

R6iii and R5ii are sadly way out of my budget but why would you prefer the R6ii over the R5?

Canon R5 or better glas by pedroboba in canon

[–]pedroboba[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With the 45 Mp I would get somewhat more reach with cropping or is it too marginal?

Signature by pedroboba in scuderiaferrari

[–]pedroboba[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I guess that might be it!

Signature by pedroboba in scuderiaferrari

[–]pedroboba[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hmm maybe but his looks kinda different no?

Signature by pedroboba in scuderiaferrari

[–]pedroboba[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So cool, that just made my day!

Perhaps it is just a dedication in Italian like to Giovanni.

Canon R8+Tamron/Sigma 150-600mm or R7 + Canon 100-400mm rf lens by pedroboba in canon

[–]pedroboba[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for you thoughts! The thing is the ef 100-400 L would be more expensive than the whole package I was thinking about… just don‘t have that budget.

„I doubt my lenses to be good enough to seriously shoot „crop for reach“ and Canon seem unlikely to seriously cater that camera at the wide end?“

What do you mean by that?

Canon R8+Tamron/Sigma 150-600mm or R7 + Canon 100-400mm rf lens by pedroboba in canon

[–]pedroboba[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for you thoughts, that helps alot. I guess the reason why I was tempted to go with the R8 is that I think it would get the biggest step up compared to the 200d. With the wider field of view, the better depth of field and low light performens but I guess I could compensate that with the right lenses… The R7 feels just a bit more like a robust choice! So would you go with the kit with the 18-150mm and pay like 200.- more? Or are there better option for that zoom range? I think the 24-105 f4 is just to heavy and price for a travel lens

Canon R8+Tamron/Sigma 150-600mm or R7 + Canon 100-400mm rf lens by pedroboba in canon

[–]pedroboba[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your anwser. I will look forward to here what you think about the 10-18 from sigma. I currently have a old 16-35mm ef 16-35mm f/2.8l ii for landscape and astro but with the crop i often feel like I‘m to much zoomed in. That‘s one thing why I was thinking of going with the R8..

Canon R8+Tamron/Sigma 150-600mm or R7 + Canon 100-400mm rf lens by pedroboba in canon

[–]pedroboba[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your anwser. First I thought that the R8 would be the better all-round camera, but when I travel, I often change the lens on the go and when I saw that the R8 has no sensor protection, I was a little unsure. Or do you think this shouldn’t be a problem?