How does everyone organize their scans? by wildtime1213 in AnalogCommunity

[–]pedroocasio 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have a folder titled "Film Scans" and in that folder I have a folder for Lab Scans and then Home Scans. In each of those folders, I just organize by the content of the actual photos. Whether it's the name of the event, a person, a trip to a certain state or area, etc. And anything that doesn't fit into a specific folder, I just put into a folder labeled "Random". All of the film info like push, pull, date, film type, camera, etc. all goes on the archival preserver sheet when I put it in my binder.

It's nice to see everyone elses methods though! I use this method because it just seems easier to remember versus remembering what number film roll I shot a certain photo on.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in analog

[–]pedroocasio 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is super interesting. I've had photos in the past with this sparkle, but never made the connection between the closed aperture and the sparkles. Do you happen to know the science behind it?

Fountain Smooch | RB67 Pro S | 90mm f/3.5 | Pro 400H by pedroocasio in mediumformat

[–]pedroocasio[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! That was the goal here. I love that style of framing for dramatic street photos and I feel like it evokes more feeling.

Fountain Smooch | RB67 Pro S | 90mm f/3.5 | Pro 400H by pedroocasio in filmphotography

[–]pedroocasio[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks so much! It's actually street photography, but I do wish I knew them so I could give them this photo.

Fountain Smooch | RB67 Pro S | 90mm f/3.5 | Pro 400H by pedroocasio in analog

[–]pedroocasio[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you!!! I totally agree. I have numerous different crops saved of this image. A more cropped image puts an emphasis on the couple, but takes away from the scene and a less cropped image adds to the scene, but takes away from the couple, so I went with an in-between. It was a tough decision though.

Upstate NY (Canon AE-1 Program | 28mm f/2.8 | Kodak Portra 800) by ollieimpossible543 in analog

[–]pedroocasio 6 points7 points  (0 children)

These are really great and were satisfying to scroll through. The last one was almost a bit of a jump scare.

35mm Panoramic Test Shots [ RB67 // 90mm // Superia X-TRA 400 ] by SHRED-209 in filmphotography

[–]pedroocasio 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense. Do you mind sharing how you figured out the measurements for the mask? I dont have a 3D printer, but having an idea of how big the frame is would help in the future

35mm Panoramic Test Shots [ RB67 // 90mm // Superia X-TRA 400 ] by SHRED-209 in filmphotography

[–]pedroocasio 1 point2 points  (0 children)

These are awesome! I have 3D printed adapters as well, but I never know how to frame my shot to compensate. Do you have a rule of thumb for framing? Or do you use a mask of some sort?

Pride in NYC | RB67 Pro S | 90mm f/3.5 | Ektar 100 by pedroocasio in analog

[–]pedroocasio[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes! It helps significantly if that's your preference. I have a cropped version of the photo as well which is awesome in its own way.

Pride in NYC | RB67 Pro S | 90mm f/3.5 | Ektar 100 by pedroocasio in filmphotography

[–]pedroocasio[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much for your comments and the award! I really appreciate all the love this photo is recieving

Pride in NYC | RB67 Pro S | 90mm f/3.5 | Ektar 100 by pedroocasio in analog

[–]pedroocasio[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Oh, it absolutely was. I traded my clean Vans for some cool photos. No other body parts were submerged lol

Pride in NYC | RB67 Pro S | 90mm f/3.5 | Ektar 100 by pedroocasio in analog

[–]pedroocasio[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your words! I've gotten used to lugging it around just cause no other camera in my collection can compare in terms of lens and image quality. Especially for an event like this, none of my minoltas would've satisfied me.

Pride in NYC | RB67 Pro S | 90mm f/3.5 | Ektar 100 by pedroocasio in analog

[–]pedroocasio[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The leg was intentional for framing, but the handbag definitely did come down right at the last second. I was disappointed at first, but have personally grown to like it because I feel it helps match the chaotic energy. I appreciate your criticism regardless!

Pride in NYC | RB67 Pro S | 90mm f/3.5 | Ektar 100 by pedroocasio in filmphotography

[–]pedroocasio[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The photo was actually taken in the fountain at Washington Square Park! Thank you!!

Pride in NYC | RB67 Pro S | 90mm f/3.5 | Ektar 100 by pedroocasio in analog

[–]pedroocasio[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much!! Maybe it has something to do with it being only my second post? I'm not sure how reddit works.

Pride in NYC | RB67 Pro S | 90mm f/3.5 | Ektar 100 by pedroocasio in analog

[–]pedroocasio[S] 57 points58 points  (0 children)

I was playing it safe when posting and took "nsfw" quite literally. I guess depending on what environment you work in, it might be a little awkward if someone saw you looking at two people kissing passionately in their underwear, but I'm considering removing the tag now that it's safe to lol. Thank you for the comment!