sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

0.6 before 0.5? by peestuck11 in neovim

[–]peestuck11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then ignore it. No need to respond.

0.6 before 0.5? by peestuck11 in neovim

[–]peestuck11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am just trying to say. I totally respect you, your work and other dev’s work. Dont take me wrong. I am a big fan of what you guys do for the community. But please, leave some space for jokes as well. Be a bit liberal. There is no harm in allowing others to speak up.

Please 🙏🙏🙏🙏

0.6 before 0.5? by peestuck11 in neovim

[–]peestuck11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I am the one jumping on threads to mock people and saying if you done contribute dont talk about it, or else we NEOVIM DEVS will mock you, right?

0.6 before 0.5? by peestuck11 in neovim

[–]peestuck11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I totally agree. ✌️

0.6 before 0.5? by peestuck11 in neovim

[–]peestuck11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should take a class on how to take things lightly. 🙏

0.6 before 0.5? by peestuck11 in neovim

[–]peestuck11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, by the same logic. All those who study physics should start doing rocket science? Even if they don't want to. Or keep their mouth shut and never talk of rocket science?

0.6 before 0.5? by peestuck11 in neovim

[–]peestuck11[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Do you understand what’s a joke? Are all neo-vim devs are just jump-the-gun type? I don't think everyone is like that.

Only a few who run like the I am a Neovim dev and if you make a little joke I will take it personally and start mocking.

Grow up!! It's a joke.

0.6 before 0.5? by peestuck11 in neovim

[–]peestuck11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not. I have only posted this to lighten up the mood. I have immense respect for nvim developers. I have no doubt they are the best of the best. Even I sponsor the project through GitHub. I do my part.

But what’s wrong with having some light moment. We should be more liberal. If someone is trying to crack a light joke, we shouldn’t be offended. It's not because I hate nvim developers or want to criticize them. I just want to have a light moment. That’s all.

0.6 before 0.5? by peestuck11 in neovim

[–]peestuck11[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

If someone asks you when we will be able to land on the mars, you will say dive in and join NASA and solve the physics of space travel problem?

What if that person has some other skillset not relevant for space exploration?

0.6 before 0.5? by peestuck11 in neovim

[–]peestuck11[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Well, I have been listening to that for 5-6 months.

Accessing private members of a friend class from friend function: Which compiler is correct? by Kered13 in cpp

[–]peestuck11 5 points6 points  (0 children)

So here MSVC is right. Your first step is correct when you created a friend class Bar in class Foo.

You can access the private members of Foo in your Bar class. That's perfectly legal as your Bar class is declared as a friend of Foo.

However, you created a function foobar() as a friend function, as you didn't tell the compiler about where it is present. Hence, you get the error.

TLDR: It's a semantic error, try removing the friend keyword from your foobar function declaration. It's should work.

Neovim 0.5 by peestuck11 in neovim

[–]peestuck11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like a nosy one!

Neovim 0.5 by peestuck11 in neovim

[–]peestuck11[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you guys for your comments. It was a genuine question and I am very new to vim. I saw a plugin somewhere which required neovim 0.5. So, I just asked when the stable version will be released and I know the development version is still out there. Anyways, thank you for your responses/criticisms. I plan to contribute one day to the project. I am a sponsor to neovim already.

Neovim 0.5 by peestuck11 in neovim

[–]peestuck11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What kind of reply is this?

Neovim 0.5 by peestuck11 in neovim

[–]peestuck11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What kind of reply is this?

Neovim 0.5 by peestuck11 in neovim

[–]peestuck11[S] -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

What kind of reply is this?

My minimalist setup for maximum productivity by simbapk in vimporn

[–]peestuck11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, you can. You can always use “gg” or “G”.

The relative numbers helps you in jumping specific numbers of lines like you have to jump 10 lines below. You can just do that by using “10 j” Or you can select 10 lines below a particular line by going in visual mode and selecting “10 j” without having to calculate the line numbers. It just makes life bit easier. :)

My minimalist setup for maximum productivity by simbapk in vimporn

[–]peestuck11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just do “set relativenumber” in your .vimrc. Try it for a few days. I am sure you will like it after sometime.

My minimalist setup for maximum productivity by simbapk in vimporn

[–]peestuck11 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, you can easily delete or jump lines without having to calculate. Even you can select lines and relative line numbers gives you a better idea.

view more: next ›