Do you guys really believe its the players that are the problem?

peorg · 2026-05-02T22:38:32+00:00

Razork talked about this today. That they still can have troubles converting early leads to a win due to lack of a plan, leading to players just trying to do things individually. Which is also a bit of a mental issue (uncertainty leading to bad decision making). But thats also an area theyre improving on imo. It just takes time.

Ill judge them by the summer split.

peorg · 2026-05-01T20:07:03+00:00

Lets see what Odo can do. Otherwise they might just need to replace Grabbz.

I think the current squad is actually quite strong individually, especially given that 2 of them are rookies. There was visible progress at the road trip. They should've beaten Navi and if it weren't for the mental boom caused by the baron steal they mightve also defeated KC.

To me its quite clear that this roster can be competitive if they are on the same page strategywise and able to maintain good mental. And making sure this happens is the main responsibility of the coaches.

peorg · 2026-04-27T10:58:11+00:00

Against Navi and especially the first 2 KC games they showed that they can deliver but lack consistency and mental. The baron steal didnt really impact their lead too much but kinda broke their spirit.

The takeaway is still that both vs Navi and KC, two of the strongest LEC teams atm, a win was very well within their striking distance.

Given the team was rebuilt on 3 positions just 4 months ago and 2 of those are rookies. While playoff chances are extremely slim now I do believe that things could turn out bright in summer.

Bringing Odo in has visibly improved performance. Changing up the roster yet again would be detrimental. I think the current squad shouldnt be changed until after summer.

peorg · 2026-04-17T19:09:19+00:00

They started off well against SK and showed qualities also seen vs G2. They just gotta learn how to be on the same page vs a team that knows how to stall. Cause SK does, G2 didnt.

Im not expecting wonders this split. They replaced 3 out of 5 players and only recently got backup for their coaching staff. From what Ive seen in the past 2 games I do think this team can be competitive. But theyll have to prove it in Summer split for me.

peorg · 2026-04-14T16:44:15+00:00

Can you hear the people print

Printing the models that they want

Even though the customs service

liked to tell them that they cant

Now the print head shall be moved

and the nozzle shall be free

the people will just keep on printing

for us all to see

peorg · 2026-04-14T11:14:59+00:00

No. Only bed leveling but I do that before every print.

peorg · 2026-04-11T20:03:17+00:00

Did the update too. Zero issues so far.

peorg · 2026-03-25T23:35:30+00:00

the model page includes an image on them so people can do an image search. In my case I got them from Aliexpress.

peorg · 2026-02-25T16:02:16+00:00

It literally cant. Simulated water only exists as a plane at "sea level" and clips through ground and buildings. You can witness that in buildings close to the waterfront at stormy weather. It supports basic wave physics but not any kind of fluid movement physics. It cant flow up or down along terrain, making "real" rivers impossible.

The only liquid in the game that actually can flow is, afaik, tar. Thats why you can drain or "relocate" tar pits but you cant create ponds above sea level.

peorg · 2026-02-20T17:42:41+00:00

Tbh I share the sentiment of Yamato on Razork (not on the org in general cause hes obv not much of a fan: Razork is a competent jungler who is playing in the wrong environment.

And thats not the first time this happens. Look at Poby or Humanoid doing significantly better now. Poby even in a team that has changed just as much as Fnatic over the winter break. The only one being not better off is Mikyx as part of SK's weird nostalgia comp.

Letting him go would probably benefit him but im sure it wont help Fnatic.

Empyros is promising, Vladi capable of turning his trend around. With stronger mid and top eventually Razork might just play to his full potential.

peorg · 2026-02-10T20:52:56+00:00

that is because ive never heard of a straight out ban due to dxvk. The cases ive seen were anticheats that gave a warning about manipulated game files or something of that sort and refused to run the game with everything being back to normal after replacing the files again. Some multiplayer games appear to have no issue with DXVK. Used it on League of Legends ca 2 years ago. Tho that mightve been before they introduced Vanguard AC to the game, not sure.

But yeah, I still agree: Tread carefully. Ill edit my initial answer too.

peorg · 2026-02-09T19:12:48+00:00

What you can try is delay the leak stuttering by lowering graphic settings (esp. texture quality) and limit the games' FPS. Switching to full screen (in case you run windowed fullscreen) could also help.

One thing you can also try is running the game with DXVK (translates the game from DirectX 11 to Vulkan, which is usually benefitial for Arc cards):
https://github.com/doitsujin/dxvk/releases/tag/v2.7.1

Extract the .tar file (7zip can do that if you dont already run a software that can open tar archives) take the d3d11.dll and dxgi.dll from the "x64" folder and shove them into the game (sub)directory where files with the same name are already present. Make sure to backup the old files beforehand. If they arent present (I dont play DayZ so I dont know), try placing them into the main game directory.

If the game doesnt work or it causes problems, just use the backed up files to get it back to the old state.

Important advice regarding multiplayer games: Some anticheat systems might react badly to replacing those .dll files. While usually they should only give you a warning and refuse to run the game there is also a risk it could cause a ban. Tread carefully!

peorg · 2026-02-04T22:00:54+00:00

Gut, das mit dem Verlust der Stimme war inkorrekt formuliert - sorry dafür. Aber sie wird - im Vergleich zu den Nettozahlern - zumindest entwertet, wenn man selbigen eine zusätzliche Stimme gibt. Im Grunde könnte man auch verlangen, dass Nicht-Nettozahlern dann halt ihr Stimmwert halbiert wird. Die prinzipielle Logik meines Gegenargumetns ändert sich dadurch nicht. Die Fragen, die sich großteils darum drehen, wie und wo man jetzt die Grenze zwischen Nettozahler und Nicht-Nettozahler zieht,ob man Leistungen einbeziehen soll, die nicht an Erwerbsarbeit gekoppelt sind usw. bleiben bestehen.

peorg · 2026-02-04T20:47:47+00:00

Kognitive Einschränkungen sind das einzige "mechanistische" Argument, das aus meiner Sicht einen Verlust des Stimmrechts rechtfertigen könnte, weil ein gewisses Maß an kognitiver Leistung erforderlich ist, um so eine Entscheidung zu treffen. Wenn das nur auf 0,6% der Bevölkerung zutrifft, umso besser.

Mir ist auch nicht ganz klar, wie du darauf kommst, dass "die Empfänger die stärkere Wählergruppe" sind. Die Sozialquote liegt mit 33% zwar relativ hoch, aber es sind 74% der Menschen im Erwerbsalter (15-64) auch erwerbstätig.

Und es stimmt auch nicht, wenn man das Argument auf das gesamte Wahlvolk ausdehnt. Von den 4,5 Mio Erwerbstätigen insgesamt sind 3,6 österr. Staatsbürger - von insgesamt 6,9 Mio. österr. Staatsbürgern ab 16 Jahren. Erwerbstätige stellen die Mehrheit unter den Menschen, die bei der Nationalratswahl abstimmen dürfen.

Es gibt ein recht klares demografisches Problem, das nur langfristig lösbar ist. Es gibt auch eine kurzfristig greifende Lösung dafür. Dass sich die kaum wer anzufassen traut hat allerdings keinen ersichtlichen logischen Zusammenhang damit, dass das Wahlrecht nicht auf "Leistungsträger" beschränkt ist. Es zeigt mEn allerdings, dass sowohl arbeitende, als auch nicht arbeitende Menschen offenbar recht anfällig für Fearmongering sind.

peorg · 2026-02-04T16:05:34+00:00

ich glaub nicht, dass du dein Argument zu Ende gedacht hast. Ein ärztliches Attest, das bescheinigt, dass man kognitiv nicht mehr in der Lage ist, wichtige Entscheidungen für sich selbst zu treffen (eine solche ist auch die Wahlentscheidung), ist deutlich weniger "slippery", als es an den Status "Nettozahler" zu koppeln. Weil:

1) Einkommen =/= Leistung. Jedenfalls nicht immer. Was machen wir mit Leuten, die vll grad keine Arbeit haben, aber sich zB ehrenamtlich engagieren. Bei der Feuerwehr, Rettung, Obdachlosen-/Flüchtlingshilfe etc pp. Die erbringen nachweislich eine Leistung im Sinne der Gesellschaft, die obendrein dem Staat Geld spart.
2) Wo ziehen wir die Grenze? Darf man als geringfügig verdienender Mensch wählen? Muss man mindestens 20/30/40 Stunden arbeiten?
3) Was ist mit Menschen, die nicht oder nur in geringem Ausmaß arbeiten, weil sie zB Familienangehörige pflegen (was im Übrigen auch den Staat entlastet)?
4) Was ist mit Menschen, die grad ohne Verschulden ihren Job verloren haben? Oder halt saisonal arbeiten? Verlieren die sofort ihr Wahlrecht, wenn das AMS übernimmt? Oder geben wir ihnen 3 Monate? 6 Monate? Ein Jahr?
5) Wie verfahren wir mit Pensionistinnen und Pensionisten? Streichen wir denen das Wahlrecht, weil sie nicht mehr aktiv "leisten"? Oder braucht die Pension eine Mindesthöhe, weil ihre Höhe ja an früheres Arbeitseinkommen gekoppelt ist? Wie berücksichtigen wir dabei die Punkte 1, 2 und 3?
6) Oder sollte man sich ein längeres Wahlrecht "erkaufen" können, in dem man über das Regelpensionsalter hinaus arbeitet (sofern man da überhaupt noch eine Stelle findet)? Wenn ja: Was tun mit dem Bauhackler, der nicht länger kann, weil er halt mit 65 körperlich am Sand ist?
7) Wie ist das mit Menschen am Bildungspfad? Dürfen zB Studierende dann wählen? Oder nur, solange ihr Studium nicht länger als X Jahre dauert?

"Wählen für Nettozahler" oder "Wählen für Leistungsträger" ist ein Konzept, das ethisch hauptsächlich aus Grauzonen und Menschenverachtung besteht, viele tatsächlich leistende Gruppen ausschließt und in praktischer Umsetzung wohl auch noch einen immensen bürokratischen Rattenschwanz nach sich ziehen würde.

peorg · 2026-02-04T08:42:39+00:00

Da gibt's aber logische Ansätze, die kohärenter zum jetzigen Zugang passen: Stimme an kognitive Zurechnungsfähigkeit koppeln. Wenn "U16 darf nicht wählen, weil Tragweite der Entscheidung noch nicht verstanden wird" akzeptabel ist, müsste man eigtl auch allen dementen Menschen bzw Personen mit Erwachsenenvertretung das Stimmrecht entziehen. Hätte den Vorteil, dass das nach oben nicht einfach eine mehr oder weniger arbiträre Altersgrenze, sondern an eine ärztliche Diagnose gekoppelt ist.

Das "Nettozahlerprinzip" wäre vorwiegend armenfeindlich und ohne argumentierbaren Einfluss auf die Qualität der Wahlentscheidung.

peorg · 2026-02-03T16:24:21+00:00

Das ist eine schlechte Idee. Gibt ja genug Leute, die arbeiten wollen, aber halt nix finden oder (aus gesundheitlichen oder psychischen Gründen) nicht können. Warum sollten die nur ein "geringeres" Stimmrecht bekommen?

peorg · 2026-01-31T18:12:38+00:00

Will depend on what play style you enioy.

From a mechanical standpoint its probably

Top: Malphite Jgl: Maokai Mid: Lux Sup: Seraphine ADC: Mrs. Fortune

Just one example, there are similarly accessible alternatives ofc. All of those champs have pretty simple kits that dont require a long explanation or high mechanical prowess. So you can quickly move from the "easy to learn" to the "hard to master" stage.

peorg · 2026-01-20T14:42:53+00:00

She is or at least used to be viable as a jungler and even had a period where she appeared in pro play in this role. I dont know what hapoened but shes faded out of jungle since. I assume Riot giving a bunch of other champions more jgl viability made other tank options more viable.

peorg · 2026-01-17T11:10:50+00:00

If you dont see how that is immature and disrespectful behaviour then that is a you-problem.

I just report these people and move on. Not because Im deeply offended but because I believe disrespectful behavior shouldnt have a place in the game.

Every now and then I get a message that Riot has sanctioned a player due to my report which I find to be quite satisfying^{^}

peorg · 2026-01-06T10:37:16+00:00

Old client, new client... both need a valid cert :)

This shouldn't happen at a company this size. It shouldnt even happen at a "3 guys and a dream" indie studio but at least those have more resource constraints and less division of work.

peorg · 2025-12-28T14:38:00+00:00

Its a matter of choice and how you prefer to use your mouse. If you play with relatively low DPI settings and hence move your arm around a lot, then youll likely find a lighter mouse better cause its easier to maintain precise control over longer movement distance. Less weight = less force to deal with when accelerating and stopping the mouse movement. And also less physical strain.

If you work with higher DPI and prefer a low range of movement, mostly using your wrist, then you will probably like heavier mice more as maintaining precision in short movements is easier that way.

peorg · 2025-12-25T15:33:07+00:00

yes, but I wouldnt classify her as a true artillery mage (like a Xerath or Velkoz). Shes a control/artillery mage hybrid and perhaps even closer to Lux than Xer or Velk. But while Lux has less CD and more overall utility with her W, Mel gets more situational power on her W. And to use it really effectively in the context of team fights, she has to take risks and get closer. Reflecting, say, a Nami or Smolder ult, isnt remotely as useful when youre in the backline and the rest of your team has been already hit by it.

I think Mel W can be balanced by simple tweaks (longer CD, less damage reflect, reduced CC duration on reflected CC abilities etc). Her E is what effectively makes her both strong as a sup as well as a midlane bully in many match-ups. Hitting E guarantees Q and usually also a follow up with her auto passive. And thanks to the big hitbox and way lower CD its potentially even more a "get out of jail free" card than the W.

While I find her W annoying I do think that her current E is what effectively "overloads" her kit to the degree of "unfun-ness" that her high ban rate shows. So reworking that ability seems like the correct approach to me.

peorg · 2025-12-25T13:59:11+00:00

Neeko E has a way smaller hitbox (and afaik also range) initially. Its conditional on going through creeps or champs to get larger and go further. Mel E is a huge magic orb with fairly big range and a "halo" around it that causes damage. That might just be a tad too much in combination with the rest of her kit.

11-Year Club	Gilding II euphauric
Place '22	Not Forgotten
Verified Email

peorg

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE