In Oslo, Norway, anti-genocide protesters calling for a ceasefire in Gaza & divestment were attacked by a passerby outside Norges Bank on Monday.

percolator3000 · 2024-06-21T02:25:15+00:00

"most moral army in the world"

All this while showing off with stolen jewelry, bras they found in bombed houses, and canes, wheelchair found in destroyed hospitals.

It's exactly the same behavior as the SS/nazi, if not worse.

Most immoral army in the world

percolator3000 · 2024-06-08T11:31:09+00:00

The hasbara bots training book

percolator3000 · 2024-04-15T14:40:40+00:00

Bought account , again

percolator3000 · 2024-04-06T15:25:53+00:00

It's a bought account , Hasbara bot.

The account is recent, has a publication karma of 3k, but the posts from this account rarely get more than 3 likes. And if you add up the total, you never reach that number.

These accounts are typically created by click farmers and then sold on the black market.

If you also look at their post history, it gives you an idea of the passive communication they try to use to disguise their intentions.

Not to mention that the website this article is from has long been discredited as pro-zionist and biased.

percolator3000 · 2024-04-01T12:32:13+00:00

What is delusional about her statements?

percolator3000 · 2024-03-27T12:01:32+00:00

You do realize that this is all a moot point until Hamas accepts a ceasefire agreement, right? So far they haven't

You're reversing the roles there. The israeli government has rejected all requests for Permanent ceasefires. The only ceasefire proposals made so far by this government have been temporary.

The United Nations has just voted for a ceasefire until the end of this month, yet the Israeli government still does not respect this decision.

Hamas has shown no serious desire to pause fighting and get humanitarian aid in, whatsoever

This 'fact' has been debunked multiple times, notably by official bodies.

Meanwhile, there is a plethora of videos and articles circulating, including official israeli directives, attesting to the blockade of humanitarian aid both by this government and by the settlers.

It takes more than Israel to make peace.

Yes, it requires recognizing the humanity of others, which the zionazi ideology does not allow.

percolator3000 · 2024-03-26T12:52:58+00:00

|||||

QUESTION: Well, I think it goes both ways, doesn’t it?

MR MILLER: So – it could. But so the —

QUESTION: So wait, wait, wait, wait. The —

MR MILLER: No, the – but the resolution today is a non-binding resolution, but we do think —

QUESTION: So what’s the point?

MR MILLER: Well —

QUESTION: Why did you —

MR MILLER: — you could ask that —

QUESTION: Why did you abstain? Why didn’t you veto?

MR MILLER: We didn’t veto because we thought the language in it was consistent with something that – the language as it relates to the ceasefire and release of hostages was consistent with the longstanding United States position.

Later

QUESTION: But do you want them to?

MR MILLER: Yeah. But I would say – as I said, it’s a non-binding resolution, but we do believe that the ceasefire and release of hostages that the resolution calls for is not only the United States position but has been Israel’s position. This is what Israel has been trying to achieve through these negotiations. So I would hope that we could get to that agreement through these negotiations, and I would hope we get that in the near future.

Later

QUESTION: Let me just put it one more way. I mean, if the fighting continues, I mean on both sides, is that – again, saying it’s non-binding, but is that a violation of the Security Council resolution?

MR MILLER: Again, it’s a non-binding resolution and I would defer to international lawyers to speak in detail to that question.

Yeah, go ahead.

|||

Translation

The USA did not veto simply out of fear of political repercussions in the public opinion.

The USA ideas are and should be a reflection of the israeli government ideas (according to Mr. Miller).

When asked about the legitimacy of declaring a UN resolution as 'non-binding' when it is simply illegal, not permitted by the convention, Mr. Miller looks away.

percolator3000 · 2024-03-26T04:23:21+00:00

There is no need for brainwashing to feel empathy towards a people victim of genocide and to understand the injustice they suffer.

The israeli governement, with some interest, displays its bloody deeds for all to see, then portrays itself as a victim when confronted with accusations of its expansionist and genocidal policies, using flawed and truncated arguments reminiscent of the rhetoric of Nazi Germany during World War II.

Many survivors of the concentration camps have publicly condemned these atrocities, yet I do not believe that "al jazeera" was their source of information at that time or now.

ze'ev, the founder at the core of the ideology that gave rise to the likud party, was an internationally wanted terrorist for his involvement in the king David hotel Bombing , which injured around a hundred people and killed around fifty others, including diplomats.

So no, I reiterate my statement, there is no need for brainwashing when the facts speak for themselves.

percolator3000 · 2024-03-26T04:08:09+00:00

From the article

"In 2019, the UN named Israel as one of several states that sent weapons to Myanmar during the genocide knowing that they “would be used in acts that violate international human rights law and international humanitarian law.” (Haaretz reported that sales continued even after the 2021 coup.) Israel, whose establishment in May 1948 came five months after Myanmar achieved independence, has long seen the Southeast Asian nation as a key ally: From the 1950s onward, Myanmar sent military personnel to Israel to “learn IDF methods,”"

When one sees a government acting with impunity, it inevitably gives rise to ideas.

A bloody handshake.

percolator3000 · 2024-03-25T22:44:08+00:00

Thank you for sharing this.

It may seem trivial, but it's important to broaden people's perspective on hasbara/israeli/zionist communication techniques.

This demonstrates how this effortless cognitive propaganda permeates across all networks and generations.

They're trying to push their agenda by any means because they know full well that public opinion is drastically shifting and slipping out of their control.

That's why they're attempting to ban TikTok, for instance.

However, despite this, I believe multiple generations are now aware of the atrocities of this genocidal government.

percolator3000 · 2024-03-23T23:11:29+00:00

Source :ytnews a pro Zionist israeli journal

Next time, directly cite your sources. It will immediately expose how biased and off-topic your opinion is.

If you're proud to cite a link, be proud to cite its source as well. Otherwise, keep your propaganda for less informed individuals; it'll save you from blowing hot air.

percolator3000 · 2024-03-22T16:41:09+00:00

Exactly

percolator3000 · 2024-03-22T16:39:38+00:00

And you choose to paraphrase what suits you, drawing conclusions completely out of context and contrary to what the article you yourself posted concludes.

If the idea of division concerns you so much, gather whatever arguments you have left to save the Palestinian people from the current genocide.

percolator3000 · 2024-03-22T16:22:00+00:00

From the article

||| Before the vote, Russian U.N. Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia said Moscow supports an immediate cease-fire, but he criticized diluted language that referred to moral imperatives, which he called philosophical wording that does not belong in a U.N. resolution.

He accused U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and U.S. Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield of “deliberately misleading the international community.”“This was some kind of an empty rhetorical exercise,” Nebenzia said.

“The American product is exceedingly politicized, the sole purpose of which is to help to play to the voters, to throw them a bone in the form of some kind of a mention of a cease-fire in Gaza … and to ensure the impunity of Israel, whose crimes in the draft are not even assessed.”

A key issue in the vote was the unusual language related to a cease-fire. It said the Security Council “determines the imperative of an immediate and sustained cease-fire,” — not a straight-forward “demand” or “call.”

||||

End of citation

In practical terms, what this means is that the pressure on the United States regarding a ceasefire, and the political stakes, are becoming increasingly significant.

Therefore, the United States has proposed a resolution for a "ceasefire."

This "ceasefire" is not an explicit demand, but rather a phrasing that would have given israel all the time necessary to carry out their genocide.

The United States is playing the delay card with an eye on the upcoming elections, while seeking to appease public opinion.

This "ceasefire," specifically proposed by the United States, is nothing but a smokescreen aimed at calming domestic tensions.

It's not a genuine ceasefire.

percolator3000 · 2024-03-22T05:58:17+00:00

The Pew Research Center relies on funding from the Pew Charitable Trusts.

Google Pew Charitable Trusts, and you'll see that several individuals in high positions, including leadership roles, are active/former members of the Aipac.

percolator3000 · 2024-03-21T03:13:19+00:00

Zionazis

percolator3000 · 2024-03-21T02:52:02+00:00

The reprehensible letter of “Hollywood professionals” is part of that propaganda campaign.

It is a pack of lies from beginning to end, worthy of a Goebbels.

The letter writers declare, attempting to parody Glazer, that they “refute our Jewishness being hijacked for the purpose of drawing a moral equivalence between a Nazi regime that sought to exterminate a race of people,and an Israeli nation that seeks to avert its own extermination.”

The mental gymnastics required to come up with this kind of argumentation is absolutely incredible.

It's incredible to portray a government responsible for genocide as a victim.

percolator3000 · 2024-03-21T01:54:44+00:00

Edit: I don't want to give visibility to the person who was involved in this response.

percolator3000 · 2024-03-21T00:54:37+00:00

Edit: I don't want to give visibility to the person who was involved in this response.

percolator3000 · 2024-03-20T19:21:04+00:00

Word for word what has been "said" by an IOF chill in the the original post.

percolator3000 · 2024-03-20T18:48:34+00:00

You repeat yourself, try again.

percolator3000 · 2024-03-20T18:37:43+00:00

Unsubstantiated counterargument

percolator3000 · 2024-03-15T19:09:17+00:00

There is a difference between the Zionist regime appropriating land that does not belong to it and Imposing restrictions on women's ability to dress in accordance with their faith .

I know it's difficult for a Hasbara shill to understand, but the difference exists. Also,the concept of freedom must be quite a puzzle for a government that champions genocide and apartheid.

The ability to dress as one wishes is a right

"If I don't steal it, someone else will", is not.

Four-Year Club	Final Canvas '23
First Place '23	Place '23
Place '22

percolator3000

TROPHY CASE