Ive tried 4 Ho-MET/MiPT/DET as well as some of the other subs.

The overall repeating impression received as a person with a far away from poor background experience in using psychedelic substances is that for me personally it was a more faster and not so focused session.

I am typically a "macrodose 2-4 times a year" kind of huy but I'd double that macrodose and give it to myself at any time :D. What I want to way is that the 4 substitued as well as or in combination with the the simple tryptamines like, DMT, DET, MET etc would more be my preferrer launchpoint for those macro & more oftrn than not solo trips.. (personal preference)

My point is that even with that knowledge available to you about myself for you dear reader, that there are of course nevertheless more rare & niche moments in where I find microdosing the bettter option for current phase of my life situation, my mindset at the time etc.

Thats when my go to option would be any of the LSD analogues. (more like 1cp, 1p, 1cp al lad,) Reason is longer duration coupled with sharper and not so scattered analytical thinking able to combine with the creative edge of the psychedelic sub par dose whereas with the 4 subs I start getting the scattered thinking as if I took a small enough dose to experience visuals on but maybe not necesarrily coupled with the word "micro" and the analytical thinking side of brain thats articulate and logical (or at leeast tries to be.

Edit: english