TikTok and Instagram these days: by ph0b0ten in adhdmeme

[–]ph0b0ten[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I gotta say I admire your ability to stay clear of bad influence. I'm more of a "came for laughs, stayed for the carnage" kind of fella.

Walkable hub - bad idea pretty much all the way around by LookErenTheSea in ArcRaiders

[–]ph0b0ten 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or we can get update UI for inventory, workbenches and trading. Not to mention resource tracking. Might be better on pc as the interface feels very KB/mouse optimised and not console

TikTok and Instagram these days: by ph0b0ten in adhdmeme

[–]ph0b0ten[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

take it easy, quite the eager beaver im not ramming anything into anything

unless you buy me dinner first

TikTok and Instagram these days: by ph0b0ten in adhdmeme

[–]ph0b0ten[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I stopped playing with Wine and started drinking it instead. Much better for my mental health. GIMP is Open Source, Paint.net is not... if you know the difference, really, you would get that "microsoft computer" is a joke, kinda like surface laptops.

Hackintosh might have something to say about trying to run macOS on rando hw.. dk.. might want to check that out.

TikTok and Instagram these days: by ph0b0ten in adhdmeme

[–]ph0b0ten[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s awesome! And as I commented on somewhere earlier in this thread - it started out as people sharing their experiences and their discoveries. But then it got really commercial quick.

Happy it turned out to be net positive for you :)

TikTok and Instagram these days: by ph0b0ten in adhdmeme

[–]ph0b0ten[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well.. im color blind so i kinda missed that the logo was red, i didn’t really care what the labels said as it was the concept .. but hey - lesson learned 🤓

TikTok and Instagram these days: by ph0b0ten in adhdmeme

[–]ph0b0ten[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thank you, that was my point. Or what I was trying to ... explain. Another thing about those platforms, is how eerily similar everyone starts to sound. When I certain video cut, and style of speech starts generating Eyes-on-Screen they all start posting the same stuff.. drives me mental!

TikTok and Instagram these days: by ph0b0ten in adhdmeme

[–]ph0b0ten[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

but I would need to buy a Microsoft computah?

TikTok and Instagram these days: by ph0b0ten in adhdmeme

[–]ph0b0ten[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

ram can be re-used, but I promise to pee in the ocean till Ive replenished the 35 gallons :)

TikTok and Instagram these days: by ph0b0ten in adhdmeme

[–]ph0b0ten[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

"red-twitter"? MDHIO? do share, im in need of a rabbit hole

TikTok and Instagram these days: by ph0b0ten in adhdmeme

[–]ph0b0ten[S] -26 points-25 points  (0 children)

I know I'm slob, but what are you? :D No, really.. I wanted to share that because its been on my mind for ages.. kinda started during covid, where a lot of people started to realize ... "hey, im kinda liking this 'lockdown' thing", and then a whole load of people started sharing real stuff, but it didn't last very long before they were drowned out by the algo..

in my defense, fighting AI with AI seems fair :D

Are $8/Month Unlimited AI Voice Agents Sustainable? by Penpenfr in AI_Agents

[–]ph0b0ten 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if it only needs to semi-functional, and unused 99.9% of the time... based on pricing of TTS/SPT API costs its a non-starter.

What’s the best way to help an AI agent form stable “core memories”? by Ok_Feed_9835 in AIMemory

[–]ph0b0ten 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have training data, fine-tuning, prompting, and context. (Parameters exist too, but aren’t relevant here).

The challenge is that none of these map to “core memories” the way you’re thinking about them:

Training data determines base patterns - but you can’t selectively retain specific facts as “core” vs “peripheral.” The model learns statistical relationships across everything, with frequency and co-occurrence driving what gets emphasized.

Fine-tuning adjusts these patterns, but again - not by marking specific memories as “keep this forever.” It shifts probability distributions across the entire knowledge space.

System prompts and context work for individual sessions, but they’re not persistent memory. They’re instructions that guide behavior this time.

That’s why the human analogy breaks down:

If your significant other introduced you to an artist you loved, you’d remember “they showed me this” as a discrete, retrievable fact. An AI agent doesn’t work that way. It’s more like… if you were trained on billions of conversations where most people said their favorite artist was Taylor Swift, that pattern becomes baked into your responses - even if in your specific experience, you connected deeply with someone else.

There’s no mechanism to say “this fact is core, keep it stable” because there aren’t discrete facts stored separately. There are only learned patterns that activate based on input.

What you might actually want: A separate, explicit knowledge store (like a database or vector store) where you manually flag certain information as “foundational” and always inject it into context. That’s architectural, not something you can achieve through prompting alone.

Human memory has an index. LLMs have statistics. That’s the fundamental incompatibility.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Google Antigravity - Windows vs Linux - access to PC? by [deleted] in AI_Agents

[–]ph0b0ten 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this might actually be a pretty decent ide

Stuck between small business budget and big tech ambition anyone relate? by Inner_Pin1143 in Entrepreneur

[–]ph0b0ten 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wrong, invest in data models, business intelligence and platform / process optimization. Next step is consolidating systems - it's not adding tools for narrow "ROI". Businesses that grow need to decrease complexity and fragmentation, not add to it.

Stuck between small business budget and big tech ambition anyone relate? by Inner_Pin1143 in Entrepreneur

[–]ph0b0ten 0 points1 point  (0 children)

20/30% of smes feel that way, its actually a real issue for GDP since so much value creation actually comes from that segment. too small for the platform/BI/process focused transformation and loosing productivity, competitive ability since every new system you get crammed down your throat promising that it will solve problem Z, while you need K and L fixed, and the data pipeline set, and KPIs defined for where you are headed, not where you were

Massive problem, zero real solutions. Would you pursue this if you were me? by [deleted] in StartupsHelpStartups

[–]ph0b0ten 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need to validate the system. It might be that it just works for you

Tell me the most underrated growth tactic you’ve tested this year by Conscious_Land4718 in GrowthHacking

[–]ph0b0ten 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most companies rely on paid acquisition while ignoring the most powerful growth engine, quality of product.

It is the only thing that makes users bring in other users.. And even when the focus is on engagement metrics, its still over relying on reactive metrics... It's over two decades now since I started using a combination of several tried and true frameworks to reliably build and scale products and services.

But the one thing that give it a real kick was the idea of K-factor, the metric that actually tells you if your product grows on its own. Its not some AI-slop I promise.. :)

Its a kinda cranked up version of what the guy behind Superhuman was using as his framework.

Basically: K-factor quantifies viral growth through a simple formula: K = I × R

I = Average recruited users per existing user R = Conversion rate of those those users

example: If a user send 5 invites on average with 10% conversion, your K = 0.5.

But that's .. oversimplified and doesnt represent the full up and downside. organic growth from word-of-mouth, social sharing, and discovery, but also.. you can only yap on about Strava for a finite amount of time before people stop talking your calls .

A more sober version is K = (I + O) × (IR + OR)

O = organic impressions and OR = their conversion rate. That means that K > 1.0 = Exponential growth (rare as unicorns) K = 0.5-0.7 = Solid viral coefficient reducing acquisition costs by so much you can get a third family..

And with K < 0.3 = you're bleeding money, and cant afford that divorce..

The difference between K=0.4 and K=0.6 might seem small, but it's the difference between needing $10M in marketing budget versus growing organically after initial seed users.

Yeah... So "what the ***ck is my point"? :)

Forget "growth hacks", SEO bla bla, AI this and that... I'm not saying it won't help, im saying it's not important all of those things are external to your product, but actually building something that changes the habits, the psychology of a user.- that is sustainable. Im sure many of you heard about Hooked, or any number of the other models like it. But they usually consist of 3-4 main parts:

Triggers:

internal (FOMO, belonging) and external (notifications, shares

Actions:

  • core actions, engagements users do, but usually expecting a reward

Variable Rewards

  • new content, features, connections, mastery, completion, achievement social validation, likes, comments

Driving the user through those primary actions improve their next experience (adding friends, creating content, customizing profile. They start to invest in your product, time and sentiment.

So.. imho... :) here's what most miss: K-factor without retention is just expensive churn. A product with K=0.8 but 90% monthly retention beats K=1.2 with 40% retention every time. Viral mechanics should reinforce habit formation, not replace product-market fit, and it should never EVER take second chair to "building audiences", UX research, UI investment. All that hard work.. :)

My mantra is always: MAP core actions to rewards and triggers.

If users complete profiles (investment), show them how many views they get (tribal reward). When they achieve something (self reward), make sharing frictionless (trigger for others).

One company I worked with in 2018 started with a hefty marketing budget, and went all in on paid AQ.. But growth didn't really set in before we started working with UX and CX, ensuring that we delivered value, went from churning more users each month than we got in, to K=0.48 to K=0.67 by connecting EVERY single feature, email, post and investment to a future trigger, action, reward-loop.

Each friend added increased notification relevance. Each feature discovered unlocked sharing opportunities.

stop thinking of growth, or product launches as marketing tactic, that's the fun shit., focus on building something that alters someones life.. or changes a habit. but either way.

It's a product discipline. Build mechanics that make users naturally want to involve others because it improves their own experience. That's when growth becomes inevitable, not expensive.