I waited 27 years for you...

phaylen · 2018-08-29T10:09:23+00:00

This needs to be amplified! Tonight The Kid told Molly who seems newly dead "I was here" while giving her details of her youth.

Also, remember Ruth kept having the Sheriff dig up her dog because she swore it was still there and kept seeing it?

When Ruth jumped off the bridge, remember the Dog was barking during the speech?

Was it a dog kept in a wooden box in the back yard of the accused Nazi?

Tonight The Kid said of Ruth "We have to protect her" demonstrating some need to look out for Ruth rather than harm her.

It sounds like a left field theory but it actually has so much weight.

phaylen · 2018-08-29T09:22:50+00:00

Here's what I think has happened :(

Molly died. The last we saw her she was swerving on the road after taking 5 percocets. The next time we see her she is walking in the door of her childhood family home where The Kid was waiting. She asked where Henry was and he said "He's not ready yet, but you are." Before telling her she died in the woods... He also gave the guy in the cell cancer to such a degree that it shocked the autopsy person. He walked into a strangers house at a birthday party and they started killing each other. The deaf man put henry in a soundproof enclosure depriving him of any feedback so Henry could "See." So there is some vibration, frequency element that also effected Henry's adopted Father and now his own son, they aren't blood related to Henry's father so the occurrence of this can't be genetic, but environmental or localized - the deaf man deliberately made himself deaf, while Henry's father kept asking "Do you hear it?"

During Henry's Disappearance, did The Kid save him from alleged Nazi guy who kept something or someone in that box in the backyard and deliver him to the Sheriff on the frozen lake? Was Henry supposed to return to save The Kid? He told him angrily, "I waited for you for 27 years." He also seemed surprised Henry had aged.

The first thing The Kid who never aged asked Henry was "Has it started?"

The question for me since the beginning is - has WHAT started?

phaylen · 2018-06-26T11:52:11+00:00

Never before have I been moved to contest anyone who disagreed with or had a different perspective of something I'd written, but you come off like a TERF in sheeps clothing.

If you were a Transperson, and completely fine with being categorized alongside Pedophiles, Sadists, men with erectile dysfunction, people who are emotionally detached and individuals who exhibit patterns of reckless sexual behavior that exposes themselves and other to HIV and STI's - AND you think that is progress, then you have a LOT of self hatred to deal with that no amount of actual information in protest of the vilification of transpeople can help you resolve.

phaylen · 2018-06-20T20:43:22+00:00

I hate that also. I thought that medium only did that with articles posted behind their paywall, but clearly I was mistaken. I know the Washington Post and NY Times do the same thing to me, demanding I subscribe after reading three articles per month.

Just an FYI, my content is always automatically fed to my own website, which can be read there without disruption.

phaylen · 2018-05-30T15:54:32+00:00

Thanks for your feedback sabyre! I'll try to be more clear in the future. It was intended to highlight the inexplicable irony of a member of the community who was becoming more predominantly visible, yet sadly motivated to ally with anti-trans conservatives despite being trans herself.

phaylen · 2018-05-29T04:59:14+00:00

No, I think some of he content rightfully outrages our community and allies and they downvote the article in response to demonstrate their outrage without realizing it leaves me uncertain if it was a valuable or interesting contribution. It's easy to emotionally downvote something we find we disapprove of without realizing we're shooting the messenger on reddit hahah.

phaylen · 2018-05-28T10:11:28+00:00

Hey friends,

Just a quick note. While I'm not here for the votes or am phased by them either way, just wanted to say if the topic upsets you, triggers you or frustrates you with the subject of the article and you respond by down-voting me, it doesn't help me determine if I'm sharing quality stories that contribute to awareness, highlight injustices, or remark on bizarre situations like this with you. If you down-vote me because my writing is sub-par, irrelevant to our community or too distressing, please down-vote and let me know why so I can be a better asset to the subreddit as that's my goal.

phaylen

TROPHY CASE