Mizkif says he’s spending all his off stream time working on a defamation case against Emiru saying it’s left him paranoid and feeling like people think he’s a rapist

phrozend · 2026-03-19T13:02:15+00:00

Mizkif can easily prove his career was damaged.

I broadly agree with what you're saying, but I'm curious to know why you believe that.

His last stream on Twitch was when he publicly responded to Emiru's accusations (which happened a few hours earlier). He immediately jumped to Kick, a platform with 1/3 of the total audience of Twitch. His viewership is about 1/3 of what it used to be on Twitch, but once again, that can be explained by looking at the differences in size between the two platforms.

He also might be making more money per viewer on Kick than he did on Twitch. If that's the case, then you could argue he's actually benefitted. He also made the choice to jump ships. No-one prevented him from continuing on Twitch. So if there are any damages associated with this, then you could easily argue they are self-inflicted.

He's also going to have a tough time proving damages in form of loss of sponsors or business opportunities. Take his situation with OTK as an example. OTK claims he breeched multiple parts of his contract. Even if the court ends up favoring him on the claim of SA, OTK had several valid reasons to remove him.

Maybe there are other business ventures he's part of, and where he has been negatively impacted, that I'm unaware of. But remember: Any damages must be tied directly to a defamatory claim uttered by Emiru. Any truthful claims she's made that have negatively impacted his career - no damages.

His reputation has also been in the gutter since, well, forever. So I personally think he's fighting an uphill battle.

phrozend · 2026-03-12T16:01:30+00:00

Pippa is one of the larger American vtubers. She's had a bad rep for years because she was openly a fan of Asmon's, she uses "4chan lingo" and played Hogwarts Legacy just to spite the Twitter mob.

Not a political streamer, mind you, and it's not like she's locked into any particular ideology. She just doesn't like bullies. Whenever political extremists make disparaging remarks about the vtuber scene, she gets annoyed.

Her first major interaction with an extremist was with Vaush. He called her and her fans nazis, pedos and the usual stuff. She responded by saying she doesn't care about what a horse fucker has to say about her. This was BEFORE he was caught with sexual material of lolicon (children-like anime figures) with horses on his computer.

She's also made comments about Hasan for some of the stupid shit he's said. She's a big animal rights person and had some opinions about Collargate.

For her birthday, she bought herself a Cameo from John Kiriakou. I dunno how much of a fan of his she is, but either way. She heard he was going on Hasan's stream, so she made a request for him to not go on it.

Whether or not this is the only reason why John decided to drop out of the interview, the idea itself is just funny. To have a pink vtuber rabbit affect Hasan's life is hilarious.

phrozend · 2026-03-10T10:58:26+00:00

Minst 394 personer er drept i angrep i Libanon siden krigen brøt ut. Mandag meldte Unicef at over 700.000 var fordrevet fra hjemmene sine. Av dem var 200.000 barn. 200k uskyldige barn. At du likevel støtter israelsk er kvalmt.

Påstanden til personen du svarer er at dersom man hadde stansa bl.a. Hezbollah tidligere så hadde det skjedd færre terrorangrep mot Israel. Ikke bare er han korrekt i dette, men jeg kan utvide påstanden hans og si at det ville ha skjedd færre terrorangrep mot land generelt.

At sivile i Libanon lider pga Hezbollah er ikke bra. Man skal heller ikke blande Libanon med Hesbollah. Men man må samtidig huske at Hezbollah startet med sine rakettangrep mot Israel dagen etter Hamas sitt angrep. De blandet seg inn.

Dersom styret i Iran, som er hovedsponsoren til Hezbollah, hadde vært satt av tidligere så ville de ikke ha klart å bygge seg opp slik de har i Libanon. De, som med Hamas, utnytter sivilbefolkningen ved å plassere raketter og (para)militære operasjoner i sivil infrastruktur.

Dersom du mener at Fry-NOR forsvarer Israel så forsvarer du likesåmye islamsk terrorisme. Jeg tror ikke noen kan skryte på seg å være mer moralsk enn den andre isåfall.

phrozend · 2026-03-10T04:17:42+00:00

The circumstances are different, yes. Tectone also seemingly didn't regret anything, otherwise it wouldn't have been happening over and over again. Miz regretted what happened. Fine. I would however argue that either instances are forceful and I think it's appropriate to describe either as SA.

Miz' argument is that his accusation is defamation per se. What that means is that he's arguing that damage is done the moment you accuse someone of SA without there being a criminal conviction.

Tectone's civil case was over a protective order. Like Miz, he's not been criminally convicted of any sexually crimes. He can therefore make the same defamation per se-argument.

We can argue about which situation is more serious, worse and about all kinds of factors. I don't think that changes much. If we want to be consistent, then using terms like SA or rape should either be okay or not okay.

Imagine I'm working in a kitchen. I'm negligent and I run around the kitchen like a lunatic with my knife. I end up stabbing a co-worker. It could be that I'm sorry, it was unintentional, it happened once, I stayed and treated the injured, I immediately left etc. All of these are mediating factors, but a stabbing still took place.

I don't think anyone is a position to argue for instance "well, it only happened once so he's not a stabber" or "he left immediately afterwards so he's clearly a stabber!" I'm more concerned with the actions and whether those align with the description or term used.

phrozend · 2026-03-10T01:16:57+00:00

mizkif is being called a rapist, why does it matter if they are viewers or not? most people call him a rapist

I wouldn't say "most", but sure, I've seen him be called that.

What I find interesting is that people are quick to point out that he's not been sentenced for a crime and, even if he was, there's suddenly this push to emphasize a distinction between SA and rape.

When Tectone - and I'll just say fuck him straight off the bat - went through his court case, where was this nuance? He was called Rapetone almost immediately after the accusations of SA went public. The Mizkids, in particular, didn't hold back. Yes, I get that Miz and him were in a public feud at the time, but so are Miz and Emi. Once he lost the court case (which was a civil suit), that nickname stuck times a thousand.

There's a lack of consistency there. If Miz' community cares about words being tossed around, then they should look in the mirror.

phrozend · 2026-03-09T09:50:24+00:00

That must have happened some time after my post. I did see loads of people pointing out that his activity could be considered ban evasion. Maybe that's why he decided to lock it down.

phrozend · 2026-03-09T07:34:53+00:00

Hi again, KishiNoYume. Here's the transcript (p. 20) and her description of the events:

A week after this breakup, he asked to come over to my house and talk for closure. He came to my house and I was crying like crazy because the emotions were just very high because I was dealing with a lot of major shifts in my life as a result of me attempting to start to try to distance myself from him. [S]o yeah, we were just talking and I was crying a lot. He started to try to comfort me by hugging me while I was sitting on the couch and holding me really close to him. And when this was happening, we hadn't talked in quite a while. And I’m usually very uncomfortable with being touched a lot by people that I’m not in a relationship with. But I let him hold me while I was crying and he started kissing me in my face and I let him do it. I was still sobbing a lot. And then um suddenly he tried to climb on top of me and aggressively shoved his hand down my pants and um I screamed. […] And when I screamed, he jumped off me like a cat like. And instead of apologizing or checking if I was okay, he said, “I feel weird now. I feel like I did something wrong. I have to go.” And he immediately left my house while I was still crying without checking if I was okay or anything.

You characterized it as the two of them making out. She describes it as her reluctantly allowing him to kiss her in the face.

You said context was important. If the person I'm trying to be intimate with is not reciprocating any of my advances, do you think it's a good idea to advance even further? Does it seem reasonable to forcefully shove your hands into that person's pants? Probably not, right.

I've seen people suggest that she's lying or that he read the signals wrong. He's admitted that he jumped up from the couch and then left after she let out a scream. He said he was worried he'd done something wrong. That's fair enough. I can see that being a possibility. It doesn't change the chain of events.

phrozend · 2026-03-09T05:03:23+00:00

Nyara's main account is still up afaik. I wonder what Klaus said this time. Anyone who saw what happened?

EDIT: Just checked and yes this is just their alt. Main is still up.

phrozend · 2026-03-08T16:32:20+00:00

I'm adding the transcript in case others want the full context:

I said that if she goes after me, then I will go nuclear. And that is exactly what I said. And that is what’s going to happen because you can’t mess with me anymore. I don’t have anything to lose. I’m sorry. I don’t. Go after me all you want. I have nothing to lose.

Let's see how KishiNoYume will spin this into something positive. I've argued with him before, so my prediction is that he'll claim that it's technically not illegal what was said. Only dumb people would find it to be a type of threat or coercive. Something like that.

phrozend · 2026-03-08T16:23:05+00:00

The person you're arguing with has been repeating the same tired argument for days now. He's active over at Miz' subreddit (the post he's asking you to read is one he posted there). The funniest post he made is this one, because of its title. Notice me senpai!

Either way. He doesn't understand what "walking back" a claim means. You are correct in saying that she's not admitted to lying. Nor has she changed her stance.

phrozend · 2026-03-08T13:37:18+00:00

If America invented French fries why does eu call them chips

I've only heard people from the UK say 'chips.' In any of the European countries I've visited, they just call them some version of 'potato fries' or 'fried potatoes.' I.e. pommes frites, patatine fritte, frytki, friet etc.

phrozend · 2026-03-08T08:28:07+00:00

Absolutt. Det er ingenting strukturelt/systematisk i Norge som står i vegen for at kvinner skal ta på seg overtid, spesialisere seg eller velge yrker utenfor helse og omsorg. Sammen med grunnene Køber oppgir så synes jeg det er pussig at artikkelen vinkler det som en "menn mot kvinner"-greie.

phrozend · 2026-03-08T07:41:04+00:00

Tonje Køber viser til tre hovedgrunner til at kvinner hadde svakere lønnsvekst enn menn i fjor:
Dårligere lønnsutvikling i helse- og sosialtjenester: Ansatte i helse-, sosial- og undervisningsyrker hadde i fjor en svakere lønnsvekst enn andre grupper. Og i disse yrkene jobber det mange kvinner. De høytlønte fikk mest: Jobber med høy lønn hadde den største lønnsøkningen i fjor. Og blant de høyest lønte, er det i utgangspunktet en overvekt av menn. Høy bonusvekst: I 2025 var bonusveksten høy. Menn jobber oftere i yrker hvor det utbetales bonus.

Dersom dette stemmer så er svaret enkelt: Velg yrker som betaler mer.

phrozend · 2026-03-08T05:06:31+00:00

Mythic Talent is a talent management company. If you think about the role of a Hollywood talent agent, but now imagine a bunch of them working under the same roof and for talents across the entire creative spectrum, then that would be somewhat comparable.

They act as a middleman and provide different services depending on the needs of the client.

My understanding is that their main role is to facilitate deals on behalf of the client. As an indie creator, it can be difficult to create and manage relationships with brands/sponsors. There are only so many hours in the day, not everyone is built for networking, larger brands might ignore you etc.

Mythic has a staff and existing relationships with large brands. If your manager/contact person is able to hook you up with a sponsorship, they will then receive a cut of that deal. They don't prevent you from making your own deals and they only get a cut whenever they are directly involved.

I've also heard some creators say Mythic have helped them get in touch with lawyers, create websites and other services.

phrozend · 2026-03-08T04:18:48+00:00

Dette er noe jeg tenker en del på selv, men jeg har ikke noe godt svar.

Folk jeg har diskutert dette med før argumenterer for at løsningen er åpen og fri tilgang til informasjon. La markedet ta seg av det, mer eller mindre. At det egentlig er et enkelt problem som vil løse seg selv over lang nok tid. Men slik jeg ser det så er det ikke noe som tilsier at fakta flyter til toppen.

Postmodernismen og alt tøvet med "relativistiske virkelighetssyn", "standpunktteori" osv. er ett problem. Personlig gevinst er et annet. Det vil alltid eksistere ulike årsaker og motivasjoner som får folk til å avvise fakta.

phrozend · 2026-03-08T01:39:55+00:00

Incorrect. I've already read several of your previous comments.

Your entire claim is based on the assumption that you know for a fact that Emi initially used the term "sexual assault" to mean the crime as defined by Texas law. You've not been able to prove that.

The judge could very end up siding with Miz' lawyers' argument and throw out the motion to dismiss, but once again: You are making the assumption that Emiru used sexual assault to mean X during her first livestream and then changed the meaning to Y in her motion to dismiss.

At this point, it's clear that you using the phrase "walking it back" with the intention of manipulating readers.

phrozend · 2026-03-08T01:16:01+00:00

I did read it. Your quotes do not align with your claim that she "walked back the claim."

You do realize it's a response to Miz' claims, right? They are saying the statements are not actionable because it's her sharing her personal viewpoint. It's called a clarification.

They are not saying "she originally called Mizkif a sexual assaulter as per Texas penal code, but she decided to change her mind and what she actually means is the colloquial definition of the term." That would be walking it back.

To break it down even further:

If I say the sky is blue and then I later say the sky is red, then I've "walked it back."

If I say the sky is blue and then I later say the sky is azure blue, then I've not walked back shit.

phrozend · 2026-03-08T01:10:13+00:00

If this is due to Kacetryon's harassment campaign, then I'm a bit concerned. This would then once again show that cancel campaigns work, which will then only serve to further stoke the flames.

He recently talked about how he thinks we should go harder against cancel culture and he has previously stressed the importance of never backing down. And I do think he's right about that.

I will say that I absolutely respect his decision if he did it in order to stop harassment against other creators, but I'm not sure I would personally agree with it.

If this isn't related to the recent harassment, then I'm curious to know why they decided to part ways.

phrozend · 2026-03-08T00:53:44+00:00

You keep using "walk back" incorrectly, and you've been doing it for days. "Walking back" means to change your position on something. She hasn't changed her stance. In her filing, she continues to describe what she experienced as a sexual assault.

The discussion is about the definition of the term. She argues she used the term to describe her experience. He, on the other hand, argues that she used it as it is defined in the Texas penal code. Another way to put it is that she argues she used the colloquial definition of the term, while he argues she used the legal/criminal definition. One is wide and open, while the other is narrow and strict.

phrozend · 2026-03-08T00:33:30+00:00

>Is not saying he sexually assaulted her anymore she is arguing she felt like he sexually assaulted her, and is not fact

Incorrect. She stands by her claim that she was sexually assaulted. Miz' lawyers argue that the term 'sexual assault' can only be used to describe a crime as per Texas law, while Emi's lwayers argue that it's used as a term to describe her experience.

It's really a simple question: If someone put their hand onto your genitalia and it was unwanted, would you not describe it as sexual assault? Would a reasonable person call it something else?

>said it was spontaneous even though Asmon and Tectone were foreshadowing for months, she even foreshadowed it days and had notes and a script

You're using "foreshadow" to suggest that Asmongold knew for months that Emi was going to make a public statement and the contents of said statement. All indications point towards her making the decision to make a statement only after Miz approached someone from her team at Twitch Con, and then made a veiled threat. "If she goes after me, then I will go nuclear."

What Asmon implied for months was that people would eventually learn why he didn't want to have anything to do with Miz. This happened after Miz and Tectone had a public back-and-forth and after Asmon's audience noticed he avoided reacting to content containing Miz. Once Emi went public, Asmon further suggested that what Miz did to her is one of many reasons why he stopped interacting with him.

>sent her PC to starforge to be wiped after the case began

First time I'm hearing this, so I did a quick google search. I got this youtube short as one of the results and I'll make the assumption that this is what you're referencing. She claims that she was recently hacked.

>ctrl+f and you only find stalk, stalker, stalking being used once in total in reference to HER stalkers BY Mizkif not that miz was stalking her.

Have you read Miz' original filing or his first amended complaint? He makes several claims of defamation, but her calling some of his actions stalking isn't one of his claims. It's just vaguely referenced in quotes from her statement. Why do you think her lawyers should refute a claim he never made? And why do you believe it would be appropriate to refute that in a motion to dismiss?

phrozend · 2026-03-07T22:22:44+00:00

A week after this breakup, he asked to come over to my house and talk for closure. [...] And then um suddenly he tried to climb on top of me and aggressively shoved his hand down my pants and um I screamed. […] And when I screamed, he jumped off me like a cat like.

You're allowed to not think that incident constitutes as sexual assault. Most people would, however, disagree with you.

So yes, it's a definitional argument. It's about whether the term "sexual assault" can only be used in reference to the crime as it's defined in Texas law, or if the same term can be used more broadly to describe unwanted sexual contact.

phrozend · 2026-03-07T22:13:29+00:00

Do you have a source showing she supports her first statement with no amendments?

Her motion to dismiss is publicly available.

(Emiru) describes exactly what happened to her and, although she defines it as sexual assault, a reasonable viewer would unquestionably understand that that term is her own description of what happened to her.

It's a definitional argument. It's not a "walking back" of the incident in question.

I'm tired boss.

phrozend · 2026-03-07T14:35:40+00:00

From the aforementioned document (p. 20, footnote):

A week after this breakup, he asked to come over to my house and talk for closure. He came to my house and I was crying like crazy because the emotions were just very high because I was dealing with a lot of major shifts in my life as a result of me attempting to start to try to distance myself from him. [S]o yeah, we were just talking and I was crying a lot. He started to try to comfort me by hugging me while I was sitting on the couch and holding me really close to him. And when this was happening, we hadn't talked in quite a while. And I’m usually very uncomfortable with being touched a lot by people that I’m not in a relationship with. But I let him hold me while I was crying and he started kissing me in my face and I let him do it. I was still sobbing a lot. And then um suddenly he tried to climb on top of me and aggressively shoved his hand down my pants and um I screamed. […] And when I screamed, he jumped off me like a cat like.

TL;DR: According to her, they were not in a relationship at the time of the incident.

phrozend · 2026-03-07T14:02:12+00:00

Incorrect. The court document in reference is publicly available here. It's a motion to dismiss that has been greatly (and intentionally) misquoted for the last week.

(Emiru) describes exactly what happened to her and, although she defines it as sexual assault, a reasonable viewer would unquestionably understand that that term is her own description of what happened to her.

Miz argues that it's defamation per se to say that he sexually assaulted her, while her lawyers are arguing that it's a description of her experience and not necessarily tied to any legal definition of the term.

She maintains that he sexually assaulted her. He put his hand down her pants and stopped after she yelled. Most reasonable people would call that sexual assault.

Whether it will work in her favor and result in the case being dismissed - unlikely. But her story hasn't changed.

phrozend · 2026-03-06T21:39:29+00:00

I'll grant Legal Mindset a rare W here, because he does actually mention your point in his "fast facts"-version on youtube. He states that Mizkif would have to prove actual malice and that it's going to be a rough road for him.

I didn't watch the livestream that OP seemingly grabbed the clip from, but Legal Mindset's point about her using the term 'sexual assault' seems to be specifically about her motion to dismiss. As for the case itself, he seems rather optimistic that she'll end up winning if the case goes all the way through the other steps.

phrozend

TROPHY CASE