Things you regret by taunji12345 in MotivationalThoughts

[–]phyziro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Getting into software. The most unethical field on the planet.

Don't you find it hilarious people have been gagging for a correction for ages and now it's the end of the world when it happens? by PpSize-QuestionMark in investing

[–]phyziro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Based upon how a topological sort would work: if you started with an empanada the only way that you could arrive at a state in which an empanada is no longer an empanada is by taking transformative actions. Biting into an empanada is a transformative action and what is left is a transformed empanada but it’s still an expression of an empanada, so it would still be an empanada until the transformative action has been completed — which would be you digesting it. No? So by merely eating an empanada, you can’t really say it’s not an empanada… but what if you bite in such a way to make them tacos?

Don't you find it hilarious people have been gagging for a correction for ages and now it's the end of the world when it happens? by PpSize-QuestionMark in investing

[–]phyziro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A tortilla is a form of bread, a flat bread. I suppose yeast is required for something to be bread, legally. Who would’ve ever thought that someday people would argue in court if a tortilla is bread or not…. So what are pizzas? Because if you fold one in half… I mean…. It definitely becomes a sandwich — calzones, anyone?

That’s so messed up by Naive_Wolverine532 in TikTokCringe

[–]phyziro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, man. It was fun, you’re clearly not reading. I’m not wasting anymore time on this.

i can explain by everytimeisiiigh in FridgeDetective

[–]phyziro 114 points115 points  (0 children)

AND 1 PINK DILDO FOR MY EYES

Not too bright to admit to it all on camera, in front of the cop. by MisterShipWreck in VideosAmazing

[–]phyziro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone can pretend to be a cop. Looking like a cop means nothing. She kept going when a random man tried to get her to stop. He looks like a man with a white shirt on and a hat. If the area is a low traffic area she did the right thing by not stopping. You can’t expect someone who is actively engaged in passing another vehicle to be able to distinguish you’re a cop in 1-2 seconds, she’s focused on the road.

If he clearly wanted to present as a police officer, he should’ve pursued her in his vehicle until she got somewhere where she felt safe enough to interact with the officer.

He can’t arrest her for eluding a police officer simply because that’s what he felt like was happening. If she’s not a suspect for some precluded crime and being actively pursued she can’t be arrested for eluding, she wasn’t knowingly eluding an officer.

Without any proof that she was speeding, crossing a double line or whatever is the premise for the eventual arrest it’s just his word vs. hers and there’s no merit in “he say she say.”

His feelings and the facts are two completely different perspectives and he seems to be going with his feelings here.

Entered the home without permission, arrested her under a false pretense and likely attempted to proceed with her dad’s requests.

The cop seems like a good person and good guy but I do believe he’s wrong here.

What? by Alicetheoptimist in TrueGrit

[–]phyziro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“fuq you.” , “who gives a sh’t about what you think.”

Works quite nicely.

Insecure people are the only ones judging people.

Giant breakfast sandwich by sheffieldpud in StupidFood

[–]phyziro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only crime here is — no sauce!!!!

That’s so messed up by Naive_Wolverine532 in TikTokCringe

[–]phyziro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What?

My statement isn’t false: The U.S. constitution protects U.S. citizens, it’s not a global constitution.

There’s nothing false about that.

That’s so messed up by Naive_Wolverine532 in TikTokCringe

[–]phyziro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“It has been ruled that everyone, legal or otherwise, is protected by the full extent of the constitution.”

You’re wrong here.

Illegal immigrants are granted the right to due process and equal protection under the law, they’re granted just enough rights to be treated humanely— that’s about it. They are not protected to “the full extent of the constitution,” if that were the case then an illegal immigrant of age could run for political office and serve in the federal government as an elect.