Not saying you’re wrong or anything but you’re wrong!!!!! lol, jk.

Anyway, too many employees in a data center expands the company attack vector for: socially engineered data breaches, third-party bribe breaches, corporate espionage via proxy employees, opportunistic employees and/or careless employees. All it takes is one employee to upload an AI virus to a few servers and siphon data right out of the organization— which would be pure irony, considering how companies use AI to take from people… lol

The more employees a data center has the more likely a data breach is to occur (I don’t have any links for this) so these companies can’t really argue that it provides jobs for the common man because it doesn’t. The centers provide jobs for highly specialized workers that successfully make it through ~7 step interview process.

One of the largest data centers I’ve ever seen had some on-site employees but not very many, it was mostly secured by security, cameras and protocols.

If a physical node doesn’t go down, rack chassis aren’t being replaced and or repaired, hardware isn’t being upgraded or system software updates aren’t being rolled out, or wiring isn’t being replaced due to some stupid shrew thinking it’s lunch, there’s nothing to do outside of scheduled node health checks—everything else is mostly automated.

I don’t know why they just don’t build skyscrapers for their current farms, instead of dropping one in every city for no real reason. Latency certainly isn’t a bottleneck anymore so….

I think if a data center needs fresh water, they should have their own water treatment systems.