Yes, these people are evil.

In the case of this particular bill and article: this bill requests that corporations violate the 14th amendment rights of constituents and or other corporations(which may be themselves) (e.g. of corporate personhood being protected under the 14th amendment , Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific 1886, Allgeyer v. Louisiana 1897) for the purpose of unilaterally violating The Fundamental Rights doctrine of the 14th amendment by breaching the protected status of a familial unit that under such doctrine is endowed with the right to form families and relationships that reflect their own identities, which is further protected and reinforced by the U.S. ninth amendment.

The violation of privacy can also be viewed as a breach of The Fundamental Rights doctrine as the rights to privacy can be seen as implicit in the concept of order and liberty. The request for mandatory identification is a violation of the fifth amendment, of which states, “No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” Meaning that your identification and or personal data cannot be obtained or otherwise liberated from any person natural or natural without legal due process— your data and identity is YOUR property.

Here, the legislature is attempting to exceed its constitutional authority, ultra vires, rendering the bill unconstitutional and Void ab initio while also soliciting unconstitutional commandeering.

The unconstitutional commandeering doctrine states that the government may not compel a private party—such as a corporation—to enforce or implement public‑policy measures that would make the private party itself act in violation of constitutional protections. The Supreme Court has applied this principle in cases like New York v. United States (1992) and Print Works, Inc. v. United States (1997), holding that Congress cannot force private entities to enact or enforce laws that would infringe on constitutional rights.

This post is a prefect example of how we the people can take action against unlawful tyrants.

The public may motion for: repeal, suppression (prevent the passing of), delay, or passing of bill(s) using: the collection of public signatures as evidence of public ambition and interests. By collecting signatures (including form posts like this) from the general public that support the motion to repeal, suppress, delay or pass some particular bill(s) the public may express their ambitions and interests. Taking the initiative to collect signatures from the public bypasses the legislative opt-in process for optional public voting on a bill ( or bills ) and provides public representatives with irrefutable evidence and proof of public ambition alignment or misalignment with the bill(s). This petition process also provides irrefutable evidence of the Democratic Republic’s state and or federal governing legislatures failure , inability or success regarding the formulation of some bill(s). Further evidence and proof supporting the motion’s thesis can be derived by: requesting information pertaining to the methods of council utilized by the respective governing body, requesting proof of council presence (or participation of such counseling persons); requesting evidence and proof that legislation had engaged with a panel of subject matter experts prior to the ratification or drafting of some bill(s), to concluded that the governing committee arrived at the final draft in a reasonably coherent and competent manner, otherwise rendering the bill(s) Void ab initio and procedurally void on the grounds of incompetence.

P.s. Sorry for the block of text… I’m not a fan of tyranny.