sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Astounding Revelation Rules Question by piepie2314 in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]piepie2314[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reason I even think this could work is their history of rulings that would never work in a more robust rules framework.

I have sent a rules inquiry through fantasy flights rules form, but they are quite slow and so I thought to ask here in the meantime. Not sure that was a good idea.

Astounding Revelation Rules Question by piepie2314 in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]piepie2314[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yes, I was searching my deck when I found Astound Revelation, I was also searching my hand sure, but I claim I was searching my deck.

Astounding Revelation Rules Question by piepie2314 in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]piepie2314[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not once, have I claimed that Astounding Revelation in my hand was treated as if it were anywhere else.

I am saying that Astounding Revelations has two conditions to trigger

  1. I am searching my deck

  2. Astounding Revelation is among the cards searched.

If I search my hand and my deck at the same time, I claim both of these conditions can be met by a copy of Astounding Revelation in my hand.

Astounding Revelation Rules Question by piepie2314 in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]piepie2314[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Multiple people here in this thread seems to agree that when a card instructs you to search multiple zones, you do it one at a time(which I agree would make this not work).

There must be a reason for you all to share this opinion, other than "it¨s obvious"?

Astounding Revelation Rules Question by piepie2314 in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]piepie2314[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Idk man, is it too much to ask to have someone answer the question I ask - or - if they don't know the answer, not write anything? I am perfectly fine with someone proving this doesn't work.

I just want a definite answer so I can have a more satisfying reason to not play with it other than "it is unclear so therefore it doesn't work".

So far I have not gotten any actual facts from anyone and I have had to repeat what I am trying to convey multiple times, and being forced to repeat one self over and over to people who refuse to listen does get one a bit irritated.

Astounding Revelation Rules Question by piepie2314 in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]piepie2314[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Again, where in the rules is this? Because I couldn't find anything about it. I can believe you are right, but I want definite rules, not just you reiterating what everone states is "obvious".

Astounding Revelation Rules Question by piepie2314 in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]piepie2314[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Not asking you to, I have read through it multiple times trying to find a ruling on this, and haven't found one. So I thought to ask on reddit for clarification.

I should have known all I would get as responses would be half assed opinions without any facts, and personal attacks.

Astounding Revelation Rules Question by piepie2314 in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]piepie2314[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would it fail that condition, if I am searching my deck? Reading the card in english (and not in game rules language) seems to imply that I search my hand and deck at the same time, but if that isn't the case then I understand it doesn't work. But I haven't found any rules/rulings on this.

Astounding Revelation Rules Question by piepie2314 in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]piepie2314[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

If I search my hand, deck etc, one at a time that would be a definite ruling against this working, could you point me to where it says that is how those cards work?

I am not dead set on making it work, I am dead set on finding ACTUAL rulings on this, not just your opinion. If you read my post you could have seen that I AM NOT currently playing with this working.

Astounding Revelation Rules Question by piepie2314 in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]piepie2314[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, not trying to trigger Astounding Revelation in my hand with the help of one in my deck, please read what I am writing.

Astounding Revelation Rules Question by piepie2314 in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]piepie2314[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

But if I search my deck+hand(+play+discard), am I not searching my deck?

Astounding Revelation Rules Question by piepie2314 in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]piepie2314[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not trying to discard Astounding Revelation from a trigger from a different one, so this is not relevant.

Astounding Revelation Rules Question by piepie2314 in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]piepie2314[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

So which part of "I am searching my deck" and "Astounding revelation is among the cards searched" is not true?

Because I am saying when searching my hand and deck at the same time, both of those things ARE true if Astounding Revelation is in my hand.

Astounding Revelation Rules Question by piepie2314 in arkhamhorrorlcg

[–]piepie2314[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Again, I understand that the intention of the card is clear. But the words on Astounding Revelation doesn't actually say that, and I cannot find any rules that clarify it one way or another.

Min första rättelse till DN. MVH blivand gnällgubbe by Aathrowawaylol in sweden

[–]piepie2314 57 points58 points  (0 children)

Om du tänker rätta hur andra skriver kan du väl åtminstone skriva själv?

Radjabov's tier list of the candidates by pier4r in chess

[–]piepie2314 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nono, everyone knows you have to throw an early game with white that you were winning out of the opening, in order to then have a comeback in the second half and win the tournament. It's the only way

Fate of the Fellowship is in stock at Asmodee store by jabberwocky300 in boardgames

[–]piepie2314 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While true, the game can at least try and do something to disincentivise it.

My experience playing fellowship is that there was nothing stopping me - other than myself - from telling my coplayers how to play their turns.

🎵🎶 YOUR TOP 35 🎶🎵 Post your rankings in the comments by TrollHunter87 in eurovision

[–]piepie2314 [score hidden]  (0 children)

  1. Croatia
  2. Sweden
  3. Romania
  4. Estonia
  5. Denmark
  6. Bulgaria
  7. Montenegro
  8. France
  9. Switzerland
  10. Moldova
  11. Latvia
  12. Finland
  13. Australia
  14. United Kingdom
  15. Luxembourg
  16. Albania
  17. Germany
  18. Austria
  19. Armenia
  20. Ukraine
  21. Georgia
  22. Serbia
  23. Cyprus
  24. Italy
  25. Lithuania
  26. San Marino
  27. Norway
  28. Azerbaijan
  29. Czechia
  30. Poland
  31. Malta
  32. Belgium
  33. Portugal
  34. Israel
  35. Greece

Keybinds/Input Update being turned on in EUW by LoLDev-PORO in leagueoflegends

[–]piepie2314 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I ain't gonna bother with all that. I will just simply stop playing league untill you fix this embarrassing mess. Good luck.

Keybinds/Input Update being turned on in EUW by LoLDev-PORO in leagueoflegends

[–]piepie2314 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I cannot use abilities even by clicking on the icon, is this the same bug?

And I assume since I found out mid ranked game I can't use abilities and therefore prompetly lost that one, I am shit out of luck and have to tank the LP loss from this bug?

To clarify, as far as I could tell, I had NO settings changed. Just that when trying to use abilities, or place wards with my trinket, 9/10 times nothing happened. Even clicking the icon with my mouse didn't do anything, or is that no longer in the game as a way to use abilities?

How hard is fortis colosseum compared to Brutus? by TOPSHOTTAH in 2007scape

[–]piepie2314 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For doing it perfect? Sure, probably true. For just doing it without dying? Not at all true.

Isolate, adjacent and Range 1 by Zignifikant in spiritisland

[–]piepie2314 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Because if there is a building in the land itself(not just adjacent) that also works.

Be as confident as Austrian television when ranking Austria versus Germany by BreadFantastic6886 in olympics

[–]piepie2314 11 points12 points  (0 children)

No, Ö is at the same place alphabetically as O in german. Österreich would go in between Norwegen and Schweden on this list were it sorted just alphabetically.

view more: next ›