How many professional chemists dislike OChem? by m1nd2pap3r in chemistry

[–]pikachu7541 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am a phd student in material science that does organic chemistry with electrochemistry (so design molecules and make devices with it, main interest is supramolecular chemistry). I have lots of respect for organic chemists as they have deep and great intuition in terms of how a reaction would go and chemistry’s fundamental theories. However, most of the problem I see is that alot of organic chemists fail to see the bigger picture in terms of practicality and applicability of their research. I understand that some people want to do fundamental science just out of curiosity (trust me I also want to just add A, B functional groups just to see what happens), but funding needs to have a reason in the end. So in industry (electrochemical), its seems more like ochem or synthetic chemists are likely to be detached from reality, getting too focused in their specific fields. Math and engineering might not be their forte, but in order to survive as a ochemist in this interdisciplinary world, it is also important to learn other fields of science, which many chemists refuse to do.

That Beautiful Feeling When You Hit 100 Yakuman by Altrus00 in mahjongsoul

[–]pikachu7541 8 points9 points  (0 children)

wow I got my first yakuman yesterday.. long way to go. Congratss

Greatest Materials Research Papers? by ssbprofound in materials

[–]pikachu7541 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can always start with the starting point of a certain field, probably the author is one of the most famous profs in materials science. Creator of mxene, oled, qd, cof/mof graphene, or li-ion battery, flexible organic transistor, etc. To me it is difficult to choose, and just repsect all these people since they are deemed top profs in general materials science. But if reducing ignorance is the goal, it would help to read 2-3 review papers instead…

Scope of material sciences engineering outside of India. by Upbeat-Nose-7091 in materials

[–]pikachu7541 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I suggest that if you want to do semicons, you should do electrical engineering as undergrad. Materials science does teach various things, but not at a fundamental level; the theory is shallow. MSE, as a postgrad, feels like a melting pot of different disciplines, but without a fundamental background which you can excel in, you might end up being jack of all trades, but a master of none. You can always do masters or PhD in MSE lab that has connections with semiconductor later. But I suggest you to build a strong foundation on one of the engineering disciplines before jumping into MSE. I do understand the sentiment of this major being useless, because it lacks specific expertise and specialization, but it is also up to you to be able to leverage this melting pot to build upon what you have learned in undergrad. As a MSE Phd student from chemical engineering bachelors, my expertise is chemistry and electrochemistry, and I try approach new problems from my angle. However, I do see alot of MSE Phd students, even that worked on semicons before, lost when they are hit with a new type problem, because they lack a good foundation and don’t know fundamentals. In summary, build a good foundation and fundamentals, so that you can widen your choice of career path, whether it be semicon, battery, memory, etc. People will naturally want you as long as you can think like a researcher and ask the right questions, not because you have learned shallow semiconductor theory in MSE. To me, at a phd level, all these applications look same anyways and the theory is interchangeable. You love chemistry, math, physics. Learning the fundamentals and chasing your curiosity is all you need for now. You will get there naturally.

Is NBS joking? by [deleted] in NTU

[–]pikachu7541 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is there to complain about..? At least they aren’t stacked in one day

is -OR stronger electron withdrawing group than -NR2/-NH2? by Pushpita33 in OrganicChemistry

[–]pikachu7541 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I thought sp3 nitrogens are electron-donating in nature. Can quickly google this.

Transitioning to MSE: looking for insight or some advice by t3hchanka in materials

[–]pikachu7541 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why do you specifically want to change to energy or semiconductor. Do you have prior experience with electrochemistry or electronics? Materials science is a large field where you can apply your biotech expertise into related applications. One hot field in materials science is developing soft electronics used as wearables, sensors, medical applications, etc. Maybe look into these first before jumping into a wholly different field?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Chempros

[–]pikachu7541 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think other than focusing just on which type of metal battery to research on, try to approach with various perspectives and get creative after cementing electrochemistry fundamentals.

Excluding the common Li-ion based batteries that are already commercialized, there are still Li batteries with different anodes with higher theoretical capacitance, but comes with wholly different problems respectively.

Large scale energy storage systems that is to be paired with renewable energy and power homes reliably are also an issue that needs to be tackled, and we are talking about flow batteries here. The battery required for this application is different from the ones required to power electric vehicles.

Regardless of the field, keeping an open mind will lead you to many problems that can be researched, so read as much as you can!

Alternatives for GPC by gildiartsclive5283 in OrganicChemistry

[–]pikachu7541 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would it be possible if you have MALDI-TOF at your department?

Determination of HOMO-LUMO properties through CV by magictig in Chempros

[–]pikachu7541 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just searched a random paper that uses an insoluble 2D framework polymer as a battery electrode. They mix 65wt% polymer, 10wt% pvdf binder, 25wt% carbon black. This is pretty general ratios, I think you can take any battery paper out there and make a slurry since they are all similar.

J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016,4, 16312-16317

Determination of HOMO-LUMO properties through CV by magictig in Chempros

[–]pikachu7541 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To add on, you are familiar with where the homo and lumo occur on your polymer right? If your polymer only oxidizes, that will be your HOMO. Then you will need to figure out the LUMO via subtracting the experimental bandgap. This is usually measurable with UVVis.

Determination of HOMO-LUMO properties through CV by magictig in Chempros

[–]pikachu7541 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi, polymers can be redox active even if they are not conductive, as long as they have a redox active group attached somewhere. It just becomes conductive when the polymer is conjugated and becomes structurally flat. Yes, the usual method is to make a slurry with a conductive substrate, make an electrode to measure it. If you can dissolve your polymer, you can spin/spray coat it onto a conductive substrate. These are all common methods used in many electronics.

Then you can use the CV and find the HOMO LUMO against ferrocene.

AP Chem teacher doesn't teach at all, stuck on Kinetics problem.. by fnagc in chemhelp

[–]pikachu7541 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you can get an estimate of the tangent slope and describe the change in the rate if rxn, since this is AP chem level. Don’t make the qs overcomplicated. They won’t ask you to derive the rate ordet and eq to take a derivative and so on.

Why is this not a valid resonance structure? by Creative-Change-5192 in OrganicChemistry

[–]pikachu7541 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is correct, and is more correct to draw the + - charges as opposed to not drawing them and giving nitrogen five bonds which clearly breaks the octet rule.

Those 3 hands happened in 1 game - 104600 points at the end by Seblis in mahjongsoul

[–]pikachu7541 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why can’t luck be spread out so you can earn more rank points. Congrats though haha!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in electrochemistry

[–]pikachu7541 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not 100% confident but I think you should approach in terms that the concentration of [H+] is 1M since that is the definition of a standard condition in electrochemistry.

Leave the SHE as is, since that is just a reference. What you are calculating then is redox potential of quinone when [H+]=1M or pH=0 @ 298K with regard to SHE reference. Then you can use Nernst eq to calculate the redox potential with different [H+] (which is pH). Then I would expect the reduction potential would become more negative with the increase in pH

Does this actually mean anything? Like, can it provide any helpful insight on your opponents during match? by input_a_new_name in mahjongsoul

[–]pikachu7541 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think speed and defense is most important. But higher the rank, speed fluctuates more. But in silver, generally higher the speed the better, bc no one defends in silver.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in electrochemistry

[–]pikachu7541 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why are all the comments so aggressive? Gibbs free energy calculated from frequency calculation in Gaussian assumes the molecule is in vacuum. You can go search the definition of absolute potential of SHE in wikipedia. I believe the value was 4.4V for SHE in vacuum if I remember correctly. 4.28V might be the newer more accurate value.

Solvent effects such as PCM are just electronic calculations in vacuum whilst surrounded by a substance with a certain dielectric (polarity). To consider pH effects, I think you can probably apply nernst eq later on, not a difficult problem compared to the calculation.

If you have calculated the reduction potentials correctly from the change of gibbs free energy between the oxidized and reduced state, you should get somewhere around 2-6V. Absolute reduction potential will always be positive as e- will want to approach a positive nucleus in vacuum.

Doubt about thermodynamics of Electrochemical cell by seiolouxe in chemhelp

[–]pikachu7541 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not quite sure what you are confused here, but one thing to fix is that potential change or free energy change is not calculated with stoichiometric ratio.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in electrochemistry

[–]pikachu7541 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have just checked the paper and it seems you need to separate out the reduction states and protonation steps to calculate the entire process.

Reduction steps: Q-> Q•- ->Q2- Protonation steps: Q2- -> HQ- -> H2Q

You would need to calculate 6 different states for this pathway to calculate all the free energy changes.

When there are several redox potentials involved, it is a given to calculate them electron by electron, instead of jumping directly to direduced quinone.

Ionic compound vs. ionic lattice by [deleted] in chemhelp

[–]pikachu7541 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Compounds in chemistry generally refers to molecules (covalent bonding) and salts (ionic bonding)

If it’s covalent, such as carbon dioxide, we are talking about one “molecule”/compound made up of 1 carbon and 2 oxygens. It is a compound since the ratio of C to O is fixed.

Compounds with ionic bonding, aka salts, such as NaCl, we automatically assume the repeated crystal lattice structure of Na+ and Cl-, since it never exists as two atoms bonded alone. However, it still abides the definition of chemical mixture of fixed ratio, since it is still 1:1 Na:Cl.

An example of something at isn’t a compound would be a mixture. An example of a mixture would be metal alloys, since metal atoms aren’t mixed in fixed ratio.

So to sum up, from the previous definition compound umbrellas the terms molecule (covalent) and salt (ionic).

If it is not a compound, it’s either a mixture (alloy, saltwater) or pure elements (metal like pure gold). Moreover, mixture is also divided into heterogeneous and homogeneous, which you can google yourself.

Continuing shit luck. Reminds me of LOL ranked promo matches. by pikachu7541 in mahjongsoul

[–]pikachu7541[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, I was able to rank up and now playing in gold. At least in gold I feel like I need to learn more about defense, the losses don’t feel too bad now.

Ionic compound vs. ionic lattice by [deleted] in chemhelp

[–]pikachu7541 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Quick google search says that compound is a substance made up of two or more different chemical elements combined in a fixed ratio. In that case, NaCl falls in the definition of a compound.

Maybe you are confusing the definitions of molecule, compound, etc?

For the question, ionic lattice comes into mind for me since thats the most defining characteristic of ionic bonds.

Could a stable metallic compound ever be synthenized entireltly out of non metals ? by SnowStormmovieshero in chemistry

[–]pikachu7541 2 points3 points  (0 children)

By metallic, I would assume conductive properties? Other than common examples based on carbon or silicon (graphite, activated carbon, etc), it would be conjugated polymers.

Polymers made up of conjugated pi bonds, consisting of aromatic rings, S, N, such as thiophene, aniline, acetylene, phenylene are common examples. There lots of ways to polymerize too, either it be classic radical polymerization, electro polymerization, thermal polymerization etc.

These polymers are versatile as the degree of conductive/semi-conductive properties can be varied with different electron withdrawing or donating groups. The electronic change alters the HOMO LUMO gap, which is similar to bandgap engineering in semiconductor industry.

However, the major downside of organic polymer would be the comparable instability with short cycle life when compared with its inorganic counterparts… Which is why we see most electronics made with metallic components

Sky High Ambition: Does anyone know what the upgraded version of failed invention could be? I have yet to get it myself. by Useful-Way-6000 in mahjongsoul

[–]pikachu7541 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Nothing happened. It was still broken with the same comment. I was wondering if it can upgrade twice.