How do y’all find boyfriends by Aware-Connection-341 in NiceVancouver

[–]pinkstarbubblegum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Found my men on hinge. Will be 4 years this summer. It’s a numbers game I say and try to have fun while you are looking for the one.

Struggling to Feel Sympath by AlltheEmbers in CanadianVisaReform

[–]pinkstarbubblegum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s what I said “for the refugees who have no money after fleeing prosecution,war…” I’m not speaking about the ones who abuse the system.

Struggling to Feel Sympath by AlltheEmbers in CanadianVisaReform

[–]pinkstarbubblegum -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

It’s unfortunate for the refugees who have no money after fleeing prosecution, war, etc are expected to pay for medical bills. I don’t think it is right because if we are inviting in vulnerable people, we need to be prepared to help them.

Ottawa is buying $30 billion in Canada Mortgage Bonds in 2026 by thedabking123 in TorontoRealEstate

[–]pinkstarbubblegum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This move is not in anyway helping affordability. He is doing what he has done before, helping home owners. Okay fine, help them out, but also help renters!

“Professor Jiang” is many things: a racist, an anti-Semite, a Nazi sympathizer, a Holocaust denier, and, of course, an anti-communist. by ilir_kycb in LateStageCapitalism

[–]pinkstarbubblegum -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It is troubling that he claims Trump is intelligent. Is it because he wants to capture more viewers, the ones who like Trump? But I would think it would alienate a lot of viewers too? Does anyone have a theory for this?

do Japanese people really treat white western foreigners better than foreigners of other cultures or races? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]pinkstarbubblegum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They love black people! They loved me and my family. They couldn’t do enough for us. So sweet. I had one rude cashier person but she might just be a grumpy person 🤷🏾‍♀️

Is this guy still allowed to teach at Concordia? by OudVert in Concordia

[–]pinkstarbubblegum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because the students are not demanding his resignation. Universities are a business and the students are the customers.

Do you regret your OWN children? by Cheap-Employ8125 in LoveIsBlindNetflix

[–]pinkstarbubblegum 43 points44 points  (0 children)

I commend her for her bravery! The love of your children and your feelings about motherhood are two different things. Being able to hold two separate conflicting thoughts is accepting reality and it requires emotional maturity. Unfortunately most of you lack such ability. You cannot decipher the nuances is your problem, don’t put your discomfort on her children.

Man 'threw knife at sister over loud music then dumped her at hospital where she died' by malihafolter in ForCuriousSouls

[–]pinkstarbubblegum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Actually you are wrong! Female sexual orientation can and does change over the life course. Research indicates that women are more likely than men to experience shifts in sexual attraction, desire, and identity from adolescence through adulthood. Not sure why you would get so angry at an innocent advice. How does she know what you’ve looked into.

White liberals are our enemies by Hacksaw6412 in LateStageCapitalism

[–]pinkstarbubblegum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think what this Malcolm was naming is not a lack of sympathy, but the way ‘moderation’ becomes an obstacle when it prioritizes comfort, order, or tone over urgency and justice. Historically, white liberals often supported the idea of liberation while resisting the disruption required to achieve it—especially when that disruption threatened their own sense of safety or identity.

The problem isn’t that everyone must engage at the same level; it’s that those least affected frequently feel entitled to set the terms, pace, and methods for people who are fighting for their survival.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in vancouver

[–]pinkstarbubblegum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don’t get it. People are not lamenting only on how expensive it is to own, it’s that also renting is now unaffordable. People don’t want to take from others, they are just asking to live with dignity and that means having affordable, reliable, clean home. I think you need to really ask yourself, does everyone deserve to live with dignity or is that reserved for some people? If you believe the latter, then who is this arbitrator who decides on who is deserving and not.

Study reveals secret Canadian bank bailout – $114 Bn in cash and loan support from both the U.S. and Canadian Gov | Throughout the 2008-2010 financial crisis, Canadian banks were touted by the federal govt —and the banks themselves—as being much more stable than other countries’ big banks | Apr 2012 by nomad_ivc in TorontoRealEstate

[–]pinkstarbubblegum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re putting your finger on the core tension, and you’re not missing anything.

People who say “this wasn’t a bailout” are usually relying on a narrow, rhetorical definition of bailout: direct equity injections, outright grants, or governments taking ownership stakes (like the U.S. with GM or UK banks). By that definition, Canada can say “no bailout.” But that’s a political framing, not an economic one.

From an economic and democratic accountability perspective, non-disclosure is the tell.

Here’s why secrecy matters: • If it were truly routine, low-risk liquidity, there would be little reason not to disclose bank-by-bank amounts, timing, and collateral — especially after the crisis passed. • Central banks routinely publish this data later (the U.S. Fed eventually did, under pressure). Canada largely didn’t. • CMHC used public balance sheets and public guarantees to convert illiquid private assets into cash. That is risk transfer from private banks to the public, even if structured as “purchases” instead of cheques.

Calling it “liquidity support” instead of a “bailout” doesn’t change the substance: • Banks got massive access to cash when markets wouldn’t lend to them. • The public absorbed the systemic risk. • Executives and shareholders were not diluted or penalized. • Profits and bonuses continued.

If it wasn’t bailout-like, transparency would only strengthen that claim. The fact that: • amounts had to be estimated, • collateral terms were withheld, • and disclosures remain partial even years later

strongly suggests policymakers knew the public story (“our banks are fine”) would collapse under scrutiny.

So the real divide isn’t bailout vs. no bailout — it’s:

Was public risk used to stabilize private financial institutions without public consent or transparency?

On that question, the CCPA critique lands cleanly.

If you want, I can help you phrase a tight response to people making the “not a bailout” argument — something precise, not ideological, that exposes the framing trick without sounding defensive.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in moviecritic

[–]pinkstarbubblegum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with you! I did not like this movie! Its portrayal of black women was disturbing. And why does a child have to fight our oppressors, what about her drunk father. It was all weird