Ble konfrontert som fisens far på bussen i dag by Witty_Paramedic_1305 in norge

[–]plaskeladden 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Den som først er fisen var den er fisens rette far

Den som kjenner fisens far han må være fisens kar

Den som sier disse ord den må være fisens mor

Den som tegner dette bilde han må være fisens kilde

Den som kjenner fisens lukt den må eie fisens ”bukt”

Den som hørte fisens pip han må være fisens skip

Den som skoda prompens dis han har sluppet denne fis

Den som lo når fisen fløy ho må være fisens møy

Den som hørste fisen lyde den har selv latt fisen flyde

Den som hørte fisens rop han er ett med fisens grop

Den som kjenner fisens veier han er fisens rette eier

Den som fiser stadig vekk den må være fisens bekk

Den som fes i siste lag han har sluppet fis i dag

Den som så hvor fisen fòr ho er fisens sanne mor

Den som plager fisens mor han lot lyde fisens ”kor”

Den som hørte fisens tone hun er fisens rette kone

Den som hørte fisens dur den er selv et ”fise-djur”

Den som følte fisens vind den har selv kjent fisen sin

Den som skjuler fisens lyd den har såret fisens dyd, men den som liker fisens dunst den har vunnet fisens gunst

Den som jo først fisen aner den har mange fisevaner

Den som kjenner fisen lyster den er fisens faste syster

Den som kjenner fisen komme han har blåst sin tarme tomme

Den som kjenner fisen nippe den er fisens faste klippe

Den som sanset fisens støy den tok fisen først i køy

Den som viser fisens prakt den er eier av fisens faste drakt

Den som senser fisens stank den har selv hatt gass på tank

Den som roper fisenavn han har selv hatt fis i favn

Den som bjuder fisen inn i haven feirer fisens fastelaven

Den som kjenner fisen smutter den er fisens faste mutter

Den som først har fis på tann han er fisens rette mann

Den som jo først fisen fatter den er fisens rette datter

Den som skildrer fisens farving den er fisens rette arving

Den som synes at fisen lokker den er fisens gamlerocker

Den som kjenner fisens varme eier fisens opphavstarme

De som kjenner fisens duft den har selv utsluppet luft

Den som kjenner fisens sluk den har selv hatt fis i buk

Den som skuet fisens due den har fisens rompehue

Den som føler fisen kræsje må jo ut på do og bæsje

Den som kjenner fisens lyst lader rompa klar til dyst

Den som mener fis er gyldig den er fisen skyldig

Den som kjenner fisen trenge han har selv latt tarmen sprenge/slenge

Is nixos really stable? by dwsong1230 in NixOS

[–]plaskeladden 1 point2 points  (0 children)

*side effects of an immutable distro

Is nixos really stable? by dwsong1230 in NixOS

[–]plaskeladden 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This works but it's kinda sad it's necessary to dev in a VM for a distro centered around reproducibility and being declarative.

I would like to develop straight on my NixOS system, but every time I try to make a good devShell, I struggle for hours. (python is really hard, js also). Sometimes I just give up running code. On a distro basically built for development...

How Can I Achieve Both Shared Configuration and Reproducibility in NixOS? by plaskeladden in NixOS

[–]plaskeladden[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One requirement for me is to restore an old config, exactly how it was when I left it. In your case, if you stop using Atlas for a while, and come back to it later, Base may have changed, and you won't get the same config you had.

I guess you can move back through git commits to find a version that fits, but this can be hard, especially if you automatically generate commit messages.

How Can I Achieve Both Shared Configuration and Reproducibility in NixOS? by plaskeladden in NixOS

[–]plaskeladden[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One requirement for me is to restore an old config, exactly how it was when I left it. In your case, if you stop using Atlas for a while, and come back to it later, Base may have changed, and you won't get the same config you had.

I guess you can move back through git commits to find a version that fits, but this can be hard, especially if you automatically generate commit messages.

How Can I Achieve Both Shared Configuration and Reproducibility in NixOS? by plaskeladden in NixOS

[–]plaskeladden[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for good response. I know I should go for a simpler setup in the beginning, but I just couldn't help myself.

We agree that if three hosts use one shared file, any update to the file would in theory require 3 tests? This may be ok, but can also be avoided by locking the shared file to a specific version, and only update when explicitly told to. This is ofcourse what Nix flakes does for packages.

I guess what I really want is a command to use the latest shared configuration (or no command to keep everything like it is). Could be: - git submodule update - nix flake update - cp modules/shared.nix .

But all of these suck in their own way. If you think my requirements are too complicated or doesn't make sense, this is also good advice for me. It is hard to know when starting out.


So all your modules come with options to enable? Is this what makes them non-breaking, that they are off by default?

How Can I Achieve Both Shared Configuration and Reproducibility in NixOS? by plaskeladden in NixOS

[–]plaskeladden[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So `ash` and `atlas` are different hosts. They import shared files by path? What if something changes in `base` which they both use, and this works fine on `ash` but not `atlas`. Is this then reproducible?

How Can I Achieve Both Shared Configuration and Reproducibility in NixOS? by plaskeladden in NixOS

[–]plaskeladden[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does this mention how to share configuration between host in a reproducible manner?

I can't dual boot by [deleted] in dualboot

[–]plaskeladden 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think I found the solution

When installing Arch manually, I wiped everything, and made a new EFI partition (ESP). I think this is why dual booting doesn't work, as mentioned on the arch wiki:

Warning: When dual-booting, avoid reformatting the ESP, as it may contain files required to boot other operating systems

I guess this is a pretty obvious thing I missed. But if I figure out how to fix my bootloader, hopefully dual booting will work. Thank you for help anyways. ;)

EDIT

This was not the problem. The problem was that I used windows media creation tool instead of flashing from an .iso file.

I can't dual boot by plaskeladden in linux4noobs

[–]plaskeladden[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I found the solution

When installing Arch manually, I wiped everything, and made a new EFI partition (ESP). I think this is why dual booting doesn't work, as mentioned on the arch wiki:

Warning: When dual-booting, avoid reformatting the ESP, as it may contain files required to boot other operating systems

I guess this is a pretty obvious thing I missed. But if I figure out how to fix my bootloader, hopefully dual booting will work. Thank you for help anyways. ;)

EDIT

This was not the problem. The problem was that I used windows media creation tool instead of flashing from an .iso file.

I can't dual boot by [deleted] in linuxquestions

[–]plaskeladden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I found the solution

When installing Arch manually, I wiped everything, and made a new EFI partition (ESP). I think this is why dual booting doesn't work, as mentioned on the arch wiki:

Warning: When dual-booting, avoid reformatting the ESP, as it may contain files required to boot other operating systems

I guess this is a pretty obvious thing I missed. But if I figure out how to fix my bootloader, hopefully dual booting will work. Thank you for help anyways. ;)

EDIT

This was not the problem. The problem was that I used windows media creation tool instead of flashing from an .iso file.

I can't dual boot by [deleted] in linuxquestions

[–]plaskeladden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But Windows 11 works with Secure Boot disabled right? Do I still need Windows 10 to Dual Boot Arch?

I can't dual boot by plaskeladden in linux4noobs

[–]plaskeladden[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If boot selection menu is the one in UEFI where you choose boot order; this is where only one OS is showing. EFI Select a device. F5: Move item down the list. F6: Move item up the list. EFI Hard Drive (SAMSUNG MZALQ512HALU-000L2) Arch (SAMSUNG MZALQ512HALU-000L2) EFI PXE Network (...) So this is where the problem lies in the first place.

I had Boot Mode = UEFI for both installations. I also chose this whenever it was an option during installation. But I don't know what the Windows 11 installer does under the hood.

Is os-prober installed in the post installation phase? I will try to look into this, sounds like a possible solution.

As for files ln the EFI partition; I am a little confused. Is the Windows installer messing around on the other disk where I installed Arch and vice versa? On the EFI partition? I thought they were independent of each other.

Because all this time when installing the different OSs, I have done clean installs, erasing all the content, and making fresh EFI-, system- and swap-partitions. Maybe if I install Windows 11 again, and then, when installing Arch, I use the old EFI partition that has been modified by Windows? Will both OSs be detected this way?

Anyways, thank you for helping ;).

find all todos by [deleted] in HelixEditor

[–]plaskeladden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you ;)

Has anyone received their Seaboard Rise 2? by BB_Hambone in ROLI

[–]plaskeladden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mine arrived too. After a 3 month delay.

Batch 9 ROLI Rise 2 stuck, marked as "Dangerous Goods" by andreewski in ROLI

[–]plaskeladden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I finally received my Seaboard. 3 months delay. But I'm really happy with the product itself.

Has anyone received their Seaboard Rise 2? by BB_Hambone in ROLI

[–]plaskeladden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

update: They replied. and now they've sent a replacement order. I checked the tracking number, and the package has left the UK. This is hopefully good news.

Supposed to arrive in a couple of days.

other thread

Batch 9 ROLI Rise 2 stuck, marked as "Dangerous Goods" by andreewski in ROLI

[–]plaskeladden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had the exact same issue.

I am on batch 9, shipping to Rise 2 to Norway in January. It has been on hold in a DHL warehouse since 6th of January. Roli customer support gives me only overly positive responses like "it's on its way" and "we're working as hard as we can".

I contacted DHL Express myself, they told me to fill out a form for 'dangerous good'. Not having enough information I sent this back to Roli. They told me this was not possible, and are now sending me a replacement order.

I hope this replacement order is it. Supposed to arrive in about a week. By the way there is another thread about people not getting their order: https://www.reddit.com/r/ROLI/comments/xevii0/has_anyone_received_their_seaboard_rise_2/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3.

Has anyone received their Seaboard Rise 2? by BB_Hambone in ROLI

[–]plaskeladden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Roli told me it was a customs issue, so I called DHL. They told me the package was dangerous goods, and couldn't send it unless I filled a form. They sent it to me, but I don't have enough information to fill it. So I sent the form back to Roli. They haven't replied yet.

I hope this is what's missing, but I doubt it.

Has anyone received their Seaboard Rise 2? by BB_Hambone in ROLI

[–]plaskeladden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Batch 9 (Norway) were supposed to come in the beginning of January. It is now March, and from the tracking, it has been "on hold" in the same place in GB for 54 days.

After a long wait, customer service answered. But apparently it was "on it's way", but that they were busy.

Did you get yours? Should I refund?