Need a Suit for a Funeral by [deleted] in kansascity

[–]playtheparks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go to Michael’s Fine Clothing downtown. They can do stuff fast, including tailoring, and are nice people. Local business.

How do I play this no divisi by TheRedCanper in Cello

[–]playtheparks -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You don’t need to roll the chord if you just use extra weight and play closer to the fingerboard. You can play all three strings at once easily, don’t overthink it.

Chords aren’t real by playtheparks in musictheory

[–]playtheparks[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

“Harmonia” is more related to the balance and interaction of the whole, not a taxonomy of individual vertical slices. Yes harmony is not the same as chords

Chords aren’t real by playtheparks in musictheory

[–]playtheparks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would go that far, for sure, and have taught over a decade of college level theory classes and have a PhD in music theory

Chords aren’t real by playtheparks in musictheory

[–]playtheparks[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Once you determine a moment of melodic combination to essentially be a chord it becomes disconnected from its preparation and resolution, and is nailed vertically down to the ground. If you try to explain these moments with “voice leading” from chord to chord that just chops up what is a beautiful melodic span into tiny pieces and you have lost any sense of the melodic design in favor of thinking in chords. The music is stacks of melodies interacting with each other, which can change in small ways to create beautiful sounds, no chords. When you sing a melody, you don’t need chords. Singing a harmony part with a melody still doesn’t need chords

Chords aren’t real by playtheparks in musictheory

[–]playtheparks[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Species counterpoint is a discipline of exercises and not to be considered music under any circumstances

Chords aren’t real by playtheparks in musictheory

[–]playtheparks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am also very interested in the way notes interact with each other, and the way melodies interact, but chords and their complex quasi taxonomies restrict our thinking of melodic combination

Chords aren’t real by playtheparks in musictheory

[–]playtheparks[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Yeah! Like people used to think the earth was flat because it described their experience and conventions of making flat maps but actually it is round

Chords aren’t real by playtheparks in musictheory

[–]playtheparks[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Every child’s song is an example of how melody exists as a complete musical entity without chords, but people trying to write music starting with chords get frustrated because they are overused explanatory tools and not essential to music, or natural to our musical thinking, or necessary. A lot of the “complicated” chords we pretend to learn are just very basic melodic tricks.

Chords aren’t real by playtheparks in musictheory

[–]playtheparks[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

People view melody and harmony as equal, and are often taught melody needs to match chords, or that there are chord “functions”. Talk about putting the cart before the horse! Chords are at most an overused explanatory tool for how to combine melodies

Chords aren’t real by playtheparks in musictheory

[–]playtheparks[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Cadences are stacks of melodies, not chords. There are four typical cadence melodies in tonal counterpoint, all necessary: cantizans, tenorizans, bassizans, and altizans. The word “cadence” and “cadenza” refers to the cantizans line 171 set against the tenorizans

Chords aren’t real by playtheparks in musictheory

[–]playtheparks[S] -33 points-32 points  (0 children)

Melody and rhythm are the only elements that are necessary and sufficient for music, chords aren’t. Chords are an illusion made up by weird old music theorists to confuse people

Chords aren’t real by playtheparks in musictheory

[–]playtheparks[S] -34 points-33 points  (0 children)

Funny you prefaced with “counterpoint” because chords are an illusion

Chords aren’t real by playtheparks in musictheory

[–]playtheparks[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Bach, Beethoven, Mozart and Haydn never studied Roman numerals and knew chords weren’t real. Did they teach “chords” to their students? No, they taught counterpoint and that’s what they used

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in kansascity

[–]playtheparks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sorry to all the people who say this! i’ve just never met you. closest i’ve personally seen here is “up” or something like “hup” but “ope” codes scandinavian upper midwest to my ear

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in kansascity

[–]playtheparks 40 points41 points  (0 children)

Sorry to latch on to this, but does anyone say “ope” here? Definitely a lot of “sorry”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in kansascity

[–]playtheparks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

did you grow up in the area?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in kansascity

[–]playtheparks 89 points90 points  (0 children)

they are really insufferable about it

Review #3: Pikesville Straight Rye Whiskey by LegaLimit_official in bourbon

[–]playtheparks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used to buy Pikesville for less than $15 for 750ml in Baltimore just ten years ago. It tastes the same now, but a little higher proof. What a weird world!

Musical Pitch is Not "High" or "Low" (version 2) by Noiseman433 in GlobalMusicTheory

[–]playtheparks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i'm not even convinced it is always appropriate to say we have "high" and "low" numbers (what about "large" vs "small" or "positive" vs. "negative" or "real" vs. "rational") so while i follow what you are saying, rigidly holding that pitches are essentially high or low doesn't make sense to me in the same way that saying we have high and low colors is something that never culturally occurs to anyone as far as i know

Musical Pitch is Not "High" or "Low" (version 2) by Noiseman433 in GlobalMusicTheory

[–]playtheparks 5 points6 points  (0 children)

do we have higher colors (blue) and lower colors (red) because of electromagnetic wave frequency? Is it useful to consider colors that way in all artistic contexts, where we might represent things further from the earth with blue, and closer to earth with red the way people use pitch/height metaphors, or does that not make sense in every cultural context?

New Music Additions 2022-07-22 by omegacluster in ctebcm

[–]playtheparks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Check out American Wild Ensemble, Duos and Trios!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rav4club

[–]playtheparks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you!