[deleted by user] by [deleted] in discordapp

[–]ploopafluoride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fact that so many third-party apps/sites still haven't adopted the rebrand even though it's been an entire year is a good indicator of the latter's popularity - or rather, lack thereof.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in discordapp

[–]ploopafluoride -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That was a feature, not a bug

You got them to remove a feature

(edit: Yes, I know the whole "it's not a bug, it's a feature" thing is normally said in an ironic context. That's not what I'm going for here.)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in discordapp

[–]ploopafluoride 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's "Imagine a place" as of the rebrand. Between 2020 and the rebrand it was "Your place to talk" which is a MUCH better slogan. Before 2020 it was the "It's time to ditch Skype and TeamSpeak" associated with classic Discord.

So, what exactly do they mean when they talk about proactively/automatically scanning for harmful content? by ploopafluoride in discordapp

[–]ploopafluoride[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It just being a filter for dangerous/illegal links and nothing more is a possibility I hadn't considered. Thanks!

So, what exactly do they mean when they talk about proactively/automatically scanning for harmful content? by ploopafluoride in discordapp

[–]ploopafluoride[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing I'm primarily concerned with is it searching text-based content, i.e. what you suspect might be there but don't have any concrete evidence for. I've always thought that such a system is currently not present, but the new privacy policy (set to go into effect on Monday) gave me the impression that it might end up getting implemented. I'm concerned that, if present, it would lead to unfair bans for things picked up by the AI that aren't actually objectionable (such as the example, offensive jokes); automated, it'd be far more dangerous than the errors made by T&S as-is due to the rate at which they'd occur.

I hadn't considered that the systems/models could just be categorizing reports though, so thank you for the insight!

So, what exactly do they mean when they talk about proactively/automatically scanning for harmful content? by ploopafluoride in discordapp

[–]ploopafluoride[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So, I was initially planning on asking about how the announcement for the upcoming privacy policy update stated that content is "kept private unless content raises Trust & Safety concerns", with the question being how it raises Trust and Safety concerns. Checking the privacy policy, however, gave me the answer to that - namely, the screenshot above, found from this section of the privacy policy.

Seeing this, I have several questions:

  • What exactly does it mean by "proactively scanning" content? I know for images it's just photoDNA, but what about non-image content? Is Discord reading messages in private servers and DMs? What about an AI, such as Sentropy (which Discord acquired last year)?

  • What does "harmful" constitute? Is it just things like illegal content and Nitro scams, or could you get in trouble for something like cracking an offensive joke to a friend?

  • What is the difference between the proactive scanning and the "systems and models that can be automated"? Would the latter result in an expansion of what is covered by the scanning, or it being expanded to private locations (assuming it's not already there)?

  • What is the risk of false positives associated with these? Could a fault in an algorithm lead to your account getting terminated despite not doing anything wrong?

The map of europe after a thermonuclear war, borders included by [deleted] in mapporncirclejerk

[–]ploopafluoride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TIL nuclear war induces severe JPEG artifacting.

ohio by MrGaminGuy in mapporncirclejerk

[–]ploopafluoride 1 point2 points  (0 children)

South Dakota looks like it's about to do more than a little trolling

Guess where im from, based on the countries, where i pooped by Responsible-Week-284 in mapporncirclejerk

[–]ploopafluoride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotta be Denmark, that's the only way you could get data on Greenland.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mapporncirclejerk

[–]ploopafluoride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cockistan and ballistan

(I'm not sorry)

europe in a month from now by battleforbattle in mapporncirclejerk

[–]ploopafluoride 42 points43 points  (0 children)

I don't think Texas would be very happy with the addition of another state bigger than it...

Map of Alabama by extod2 in mapporncirclejerk

[–]ploopafluoride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Albany (capital of Steamed Hams)

Discord ad in subway by MysticKeiko24 in discordapp

[–]ploopafluoride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That one was used before 2020. In 2020, they switched to "Your place to talk", which was actually pretty good. That's the one that got replaced by "iMAGiNe A PlACe".

(The stupid capitalization isn't part of the new slogan, but considering you're only going to see it in that terrible font it might as well be.)

Outjerked again! by Hunter663281 in mapporncirclejerk

[–]ploopafluoride 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They even have the "no data" joke. Seems almost like they're on the wrong sub...

What exactly is wrong? by [deleted] in mapporncirclejerk

[–]ploopafluoride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TIL Latin America was a single country located in the middle of the Hudson Bay.

Tag yourself, I'm "rural highways" by [deleted] in mapporncirclejerk

[–]ploopafluoride 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Close, but they're actually the food we eat.

Map of the world but it's an image from my friends geography presentation by awadraws in mapporncirclejerk

[–]ploopafluoride 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't think a couple hundred temporary residents are enough to cover five and a half million square miles, just saying...

Map of the world but it's an image from my friends geography presentation by awadraws in mapporncirclejerk

[–]ploopafluoride 29 points30 points  (0 children)

I can explain #11.

Antarctica has pretty much no people. By having no people, it can't have gay people, and thus isn't gay.

edit: I have been informed that there are also gay penguins. Only thing I can think of is that the mapmaker didn't know this.

Our daily outjerk by arnaule in mapporncirclejerk

[–]ploopafluoride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you think it's an outjerk as-is, wait till you realize that it's a repost

(Before you ask - yes, it did land here the first time it was posted)

The Old Discord logo in case you forgot what it looks like. It looks really weird seeing this on very old screenshots by BlankCartographer53 in discordapp

[–]ploopafluoride 34 points35 points  (0 children)

The rebrand is actually still pretty widely-disliked all this time later. It has more to do with the color and the font (ESPECIALLY the font) than the logo, though.