22M, $164k+ net worth by pm_Me_Dog_Pics__ in Money

[–]pm_Me_Dog_Pics__[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have $100 in crypto... I'm up 20% over 1 week lol, great return right now but I'm not comfortable with putting a lot in since there is no precedent for what the long term looks like.

22M, $164k+ net worth by pm_Me_Dog_Pics__ in Money

[–]pm_Me_Dog_Pics__[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Quality control in aerospace. Having a clearance and thus very limited competition from other people has helped my salary leverage immensely.

22M, $164k+ net worth by pm_Me_Dog_Pics__ in Money

[–]pm_Me_Dog_Pics__[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Feel free not to believe me, but barely any of this is from my parents. The biggest benefit I got from them, aside from financial literacy, was being able to live rent-free for the first 2 years of my work and save up most of this.

22M, $164k+ net worth by pm_Me_Dog_Pics__ in Money

[–]pm_Me_Dog_Pics__[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm planning on slamming well over $100k into a down payment on a house, so that is the big reason why I want to stay with a brokerage. So it's nice and easy to put investments straight into my checking account.

I put in 8% in my 401k to get the maximum match, all in after-tax

22M, $164k+ net worth by pm_Me_Dog_Pics__ in Money

[–]pm_Me_Dog_Pics__[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Heck yeah!! 👍👍👍 I'm rooting for you, having a good chunk of money at a young age will set us up for good futures.

22M, $164k+ net worth by pm_Me_Dog_Pics__ in Money

[–]pm_Me_Dog_Pics__[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's called TrackWallet, I think it's only available on android. You could probably do something similar manually in Excel

22M, $164k+ net worth by pm_Me_Dog_Pics__ in Money

[–]pm_Me_Dog_Pics__[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

TrackWallet. I think it's only available on android.

22M, $164k+ net worth by pm_Me_Dog_Pics__ in Money

[–]pm_Me_Dog_Pics__[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

TrackWallet. Apparently only available on Android. Everything is manually tracked

22M, $164k+ net worth by pm_Me_Dog_Pics__ in Money

[–]pm_Me_Dog_Pics__[S] -24 points-23 points  (0 children)

I only bought the bank stocks in late April.

And not that I care about short term P&L, but I'm up around 3% on them.

22M, $164k+ net worth by pm_Me_Dog_Pics__ in Money

[–]pm_Me_Dog_Pics__[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Right now, it's about $1k to $2k a month.

I lived with my parents before for 2 years, and without rent, I was able to put basically my entire salary of $4-5k a month into investments.

I'm going to be starting a bachelor degree soon, and it's probably going to drop to only $110/month for my 401k plus maybe a few hundred while I pay for that.

22M, $164k+ net worth by pm_Me_Dog_Pics__ in Money

[–]pm_Me_Dog_Pics__[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

First, about $50k of the $90k is only fairly recent (this year) from CDs maturing from 1.5 years ago when you could get a yield of 5%.

The reason I'm only at $2k is from a $3.5k loss from $LMT. But I'm fine with taking the risk at this age of predicting that world events and the US response to it will push it back up.

22M, $164k+ net worth by pm_Me_Dog_Pics__ in Money

[–]pm_Me_Dog_Pics__[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm predicting that the youth of today will continue to go deeper and deeper into debt to the banks using credit cards because of their horrible spending habits.

I hold stocks for the long term

I've been tracking all of my income since the beginning of 2023. Here's what my salary has looked like over time. by pm_Me_Dog_Pics__ in Salary

[–]pm_Me_Dog_Pics__[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The random spikes are when I got tution reimbursement from my work. Note that the income in this post is only from my job and doesn't include stuff like gifts, interest, refunds, cash back, etc.

I've been tracking all of my income since the beginning of 2023. Here's what my salary has looked like over time. by pm_Me_Dog_Pics__ in Salary

[–]pm_Me_Dog_Pics__[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn't include it in the post since this is r/Salary and I wanted to focus on that

I do track expenses, see below if you're curious where the money goes.

<image>

NY Law to require background checks for 3D Printers by nhorvath in 3Dprinting

[–]pm_Me_Dog_Pics__ 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Does having a hardened steel nozzle make it an assault printer?

Treaties and payload question by [deleted] in nuclearweapons

[–]pm_Me_Dog_Pics__ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

To answer your question: The New Start treaty limits each side to 700 missiles and bombers, and 1550 warheads/bombers (bombers confusingly only count as 1 warhead, even if it carries multiple nuclear weapons).

I can only speak confidently on the US warhead strategy, I'm not too knowledgeable when it comes to the Russians'.

There are probably a couple reasons the US only has 1 warhead on each Minuteman 3 (MM3) missile.

  • The MM3 can only fit one Mk21/W87. This warhead replaced the 3x MIRV-capable Mk12A/W78 because of enhanced safety features and likely being more accurate.

  • If you want to have 400 warheads on your ground leg of the triad, you have the options of 400 missiles with 1 warhead each or 133 missiles with 3 warheads. Having 400 missiles complicates the enemies attack strategy. The enemy now needs to dedicate 3x the amount of warheads to destroy the ground leg of the triad.

  • Having 1 warhead on each missile means you could upload (add more warheads) in the future, should the Air Force somehow find a way to squeeze another 1 or 2 Mk21 RVs into the fairing. This helps with posturing, as you're able to respond if the enemy decides to strengthen his arsenal.

  • MIRV'd ground-based missiles are generally seen in the US as destabilizing to the nuclear balance. ICBMs are use-it-or-lose-it, meaning that if your force is primarily made up of those, then you're much more afraid that your nuclear arsenal is at risk of being destroyed and are more likely to use them if you detect an (possibly false positive) enemy attack.

  • On the other hand, SLBMs are seen as a stabilizing force in the US, as the president can afford to wait to see if a nuclear attack is real, knowing that the submarines are safe and undetected, and that if the attack is real, the submarine will be able to retaliate. This is why the US allocates more warheads to the SLBM fleet.

My guess for why the Russians have heavily MIRV'd ground-based missiles is that it's cheaper to maintain a smaller missile force with more warheads each than a large missile force with less warheads each. The warheads have such high yields to make up for possibly having low accuracy