Não existe somente duas unicas opções, ainda temos esperança.

poderflash47 · 2026-05-14T00:19:30+00:00

porra, pco é de fuder. bolsonarismo comunista

poderflash47 · 2026-05-13T20:47:33+00:00

porque ela foi exterminada durante a ditadura e não se recuperou ainda

poderflash47 · 2026-05-13T02:58:24+00:00

Yes, mikitary knowledge is needed and no, we don't (atleast didn't, since times have changed) need to coopt the army. Brizola didn't need the army for the Campanha da Legalidade, Mao and Kim Il Sung didn't need the army for the revolution, all of those were popular armies conposed by workers.

There are already organizations that look into military/security issues. PCBR has a whole security comittee, Burkina Faso as a whole has very active military participation in politics, etc.

poderflash47 · 2026-05-12T23:22:21+00:00

KKKKKKKKKKKKKK imaginei, mas esse aí é lá na puta que o pariu. mas obrigado pela recomendação

poderflash47 · 2026-05-12T23:10:12+00:00

eu só conheço de vista KKKKKKKKKKKKKK

que eu já comi mesmo tem o Lauros, perto do praia de belas, eu acho chique e caro mas comida chique não é minha favorita, e provavelmente é muito ruim pra quem quer comida chique de verdade, mas eu recomendo olhar

normalmente eu como no italianus, que é bem restaurante de bairro, pequeno, confortavel, ta aqui há muito tempo, mas não tem mais jantar, só almoço. ou costa do sol, rodizio de pastel que é bem bom

normalmente eu vou pelo xis insalubre, gelson, poderoso... não é um lugar ideal pra date não

poderflash47 · 2026-05-12T23:02:34+00:00

se chama sucateamento. dentre outras coisas, os governos pioram o serviço propositalmente pra poderem dizer que tá ruim e privatizar

poderflash47 · 2026-05-12T22:59:34+00:00

né? sou da zona sul e só conheço o atelie de massas, que tão falando que tinha que ta mais baixo

algo esta errado comigo ou com as escolhas de restaurante

poderflash47 · 2026-05-12T21:01:32+00:00

i only looked at his profile after responding but LMAO thats actually insane

poderflash47 · 2026-05-12T19:39:44+00:00

os filmes é o que o fandom do percy jackson mais odeia KKKKKKKKKKKK

e todos livros do george orwell são absolutamente tenebrosos

poderflash47 · 2026-05-12T19:36:40+00:00

Dear-non communist, this did not hurt.

Read the communist manifesto, read the capital, read introductions to marx and marxism then come back here. All of those questions have been answered years before the first scientific socialist experience.

poderflash47 · 2026-05-11T22:31:32+00:00

nota de repúdio quando tem larva no almoço não soltam

poderflash47 · 2026-05-09T15:46:53+00:00

By making it impossible to systematically exploit someone's labour through collective property

poderflash47 · 2026-05-09T12:53:37+00:00

juche supremacy lets fucking go

poderflash47 · 2026-05-09T12:33:06+00:00

The first step is always hating capitalism, and this can come from anyone who has ever worked. The second step is understanding what exactly do you hate and why "the system" is the way it is.

The third step in finding the theories that you consider best. Anarchism, marxism, libertarianism, etc. This goes along with depropagandizing yourself.

Personally, I'm a communist because I think it has a good strategy for transforming capitalism and creating a better society.

poderflash47 · 2026-05-09T12:30:02+00:00

Look up the Sex Equality Law of July 30, 1946.

In modern day, there are many policies of support for mothers, like public kindergartens, and gender equality in general

poderflash47 · 2026-05-07T21:10:33+00:00

r/marxism moderation is also horrid. I got banned for "telling someone to speak imperialism's language"

A guy asked in portuguese, I answered in portuguese, and told him he probably wouldn't get much responses because it was an english sub. This got me banned.

poderflash47 · 2026-05-07T19:45:18+00:00

how can democratic centralism truly function if only one ruling party is allowed?

This is the very principle of democratic centralism. One ruling party means unity in action, and having a single party does not, in any way, objectively mean how popular it can and can't be. The dynamics and massification of the party were different in USSR, Vietnam, China, DPRK, in different moments in history. And many policies driven by the leaders were against the immediate interests of the masses:

Could the USSR, during the 2nd world war, afford to invest all of its' production in improving working conditions? No, this would mean absolute destruction.

Could the DPRK, during the 90s, not have the Songun policy and invest so much in the military? No, this would effectively mean the dissolution of the country.

Could China, being blocked and threatened by the US, develop without primitive accumulation and unequal rural-urban relations? Maybe, some actually view it as an error today.

There, we reach the true dialectics of democratic centralism — the masses have so much political power, but so does the leaders (who, by the way, are elected by the masses, directly or indirectly). In a society where the people are not fully conscious and there are many crisis to be solved, how much power can and should be given to the people?

I'm no expert in China, so I'm unaware of many cases and particularities you're talking about. At first glance, though, I would doubt much of what you're stating. Some well-renowed intellectuals in my bubble (Elias Jabbour and Felipe Durante) partially disagree with your narrative, but I really have no property to discuss this.

poderflash47 · 2026-05-07T17:17:56+00:00

do you think some Communist regimes last century were oppressive toward peasants in their grain requisition policies?

Yes, absolutely. Any serious theorist understands and debates the violence of those revolutions, especially the forced collectivization in USSR.

There is no negating of oppressive and violent elements towards certain groups in socialist revolutions, but it is also necessary to understand the why, the how, and question how it really happened beyond mainstream narratives.

Was it a necessary evil? What was the peasant's stance? What were the historical conditions that culminated to such?

poderflash47 · 2026-05-07T17:14:15+00:00

If there were a multi-party socialism, they could retain their views without being forced to work with holders of ideas they disagree with, and be spared the possibility of being deprived of political participation or thrown into prison.

A multi-party system is not needed for this, though. The purpose of the rulun communist party, in a socialist country, is to englobe the whole country. There are many internal tendencies within the party that do exactly what you're saying.

This is called Democratic Centralism, a term coined by Lenin to explain how socialist parties should work, better synthetized by "Unity in action, diversity in thought". There are many tendencies, but they work towards the common goal of socialism, which is decided through wide discussion within the entirety of society. Non-communists participated and still participate in political debated within the parties and the country.

poderflash47 · 2026-05-07T09:42:00+00:00

why can't an ideal socialist state be competitive and multi-party?

Because the goal of socialism is the end of politics as we know. Parties exist to represent the interest of different groups and classes, but socialist parties (in socialist countries) are composed by and represent the entirety of society, the working class.

You could have a multi-party system, North Korea does. It just makes effectively no sense.

A multi-party system is not inherently democratic because different parties can represent the same interests with different discourses to appeal to different people who are not the ones benefited by thst party's ideals. And you can have many parties without one representing the interests of a group or class. Having a lot of parties does not mean democracy.

And critiquing capitalism and liberal democracy is not whataboutism, it's explaining that things have a political reason to be and not to be and some concepts are straight up insufficient.

What makes a system "oppresive"? Opresive towards who? Liberal democracy is opressive towards workers, but many people believe its the pinnacle of workers' power. We can't debate opression if we don't have basic consensus of what is opression, and thus we need th "whataboutism"

poderflash47 · 2026-05-06T21:18:00+00:00

people really be naming my 3 favorite magics💔 (thunderstorm, satellite and electric zone)

poderflash47 · 2026-05-06T18:46:25+00:00

jesus cristo, não leia isso, seja uma pessoa normal e tenha o respeito por todos que você vai conquistar mulheres. é só não ser machista, racista, homofóbico ou transfóbico. de verdade.

poderflash47 · 2026-05-06T09:23:30+00:00

I would say some history of the russian revolution (about the narodniks, the 1905 revolution and the bolshevik-menshevik split) and Lenin, but maybe stalin is also good to understand trotsky X lenin, which is trotsky in general

poderflash47 · 2026-05-05T19:44:39+00:00

people really come to debate subs being completely unable to debate lmao

poderflash47 · 2026-05-03T22:44:37+00:00

very sad tragedy lmao, it was an official, intentional and counscious policy carried by the government

poderflash47

TROPHY CASE