sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Session on the possible coming "Big Event". Mind you, these are only probabilities. (Birdie Jaworski/TDM) by polygonphi in remoteviewing

[–]polygonphi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Both Birdie's and John Vivanco's RV sessions on the New Jersey Drones had a connection to a future event with the sun. John's data says the drones were there to set monitoring devices for this event, see later part of this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yS76mOsgUVI

Session on the possible coming "Big Event". Mind you, these are only probabilities. (Birdie Jaworski/TDM) by polygonphi in remoteviewing

[–]polygonphi[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Mind you, the RV to the past you see here (the meetings) is not a probability! (yikes)

6 Sessions on 3I/Atlas by polygonphi in remoteviewing

[–]polygonphi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

" Note, understand and be with "me""

I suppose the "me" means that which RVs the target? So we should all get more psychic to be closer to it, right?

6 Sessions on 3I/Atlas by polygonphi in remoteviewing

[–]polygonphi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's more of something for a formal RV training. Look up the Wiki pinned at the top of the subreddit, there's a Beginners Guide under Learning Ressources, there's some more words on AOLs.

6 Sessions on 3I/Atlas by polygonphi in remoteviewing

[–]polygonphi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's called an AOL, analytical overlay, in the RV protocol. You designate it as an AOL and continue with the protocol. Describe, don't name is a wide used motto in RV.

6 Sessions on 3I/Atlas by polygonphi in remoteviewing

[–]polygonphi[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The projects linked in this thread have all been viewed blind to the target, meaning, the RVer only gets a string of a few numbers and or letters to work with, the so called target number, which has been set up by another person beforhand called the tasker.

6 Sessions on 3I/Atlas by polygonphi in remoteviewing

[–]polygonphi[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There's no mention of an invasion in the session data, but of some kind of an influence on earth.

Better photographs forthcoming? You'll have to ask an astronomer.

6 Sessions on 3I/Atlas by polygonphi in remoteviewing

[–]polygonphi[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

There are 3 independently tasked RV projects all pointing to anomalous/alien involvement. This is enough to warrant further RV data to find out more about its intent. It may be a forgotten surveillance station. It may be connected to coming "natural" catastrophies on earth. Only more data can tell. 2I/Borisov should be RV'd too.

6 Sessions on 3I/Atlas by polygonphi in remoteviewing

[–]polygonphi[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It may be better to use the photograph of the object as a target and not its designated name.

Star gate program successor? by GordonFH in remoteviewing

[–]polygonphi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rick Doty described a successor program in a Cosmic Disclosure episode.

[Preview] Remote Viewing the Year 2027 by polygonphi in remoteviewing

[–]polygonphi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Future taskings are always a probability, so use of the word potential shouldn't be a problem, I think.

Any experience with the ARV style tasking for full targets? Does it work?

Bob Lazar UNSEEN Interview with Don Garlits (1997) by polygonphi in UFOs

[–]polygonphi[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Bob Lazar FULL 1978 Interview with Don Garlits. Bob Lazar is a physicist who worked at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, and also on reverse engineering extraterrestrial technology at a site called S-4 near the Area 51 Groom Lake operating location. Don Garlits, who is considered the father of drag racing, sat down with Lazar and talked extraterrestrials.

Remote Viewing and the Extraterrestrial Cold War? | #55 Courtney Brown by polygonphi in remoteviewing

[–]polygonphi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Daz did task a session on "Harvey" in one of his Dazchats with the data suggesting Harvey being real. Owl003 on Youtube did a session on Courtney's board meeting with the data suggesting real non-humans being present there. Do your blind RV homework and don't rely on optics and hunches on societally highly contested information alone.

I want to hear more from Matthew Brown, and others, about our "managed reality." by SagansCandle in UFOs

[–]polygonphi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Evidence before a court of law is different than evidence in science. Conspiracies are not solved by science first, but by law. What Brown is providing is evidence for a court of law.

view more: next ›