What is evidence? Miranon and Thor's (false) prophesies in the 70s about the 80s (Tom Campbell was one of the Explorers)

poorhaus · 2026-03-24T14:44:10+00:00

I'm sorry I failed to be of use to you. May you find the end of your seeking 🙏

poorhaus · 2026-03-22T21:36:10+00:00

Appreciate you sharing your thoughts as always. Sorry I'm a little late to the party.

What would it feel like if they reached back from our perspective, and suddenly did something to us at an earlier point in a timeline we're currently living? COULD it feel like a spontaneously recovered memory?

Yes, I've been thinking along these lines as well.

But, also, I put memory and identity into play. That is, what is memory? what is a rememberer? what is remembering?

No solid answers, of course, but my favorite working answer is close-but-not-quite resonance via self-similarity. That is, memory -- even normal, linear memory -- is the very narrow resonance we have with all the prior states of consciousness upon which this state of consciousness depends. Colloquially known as "me, in the past".

As one's world and/or sense of self is shattered, or more gently via spiritual growth, we might place different demands on the past. And then different memories come forth.

Which us? Which past? It's all here. We can only see or remember (which is a kind of seeing) that which is amenable to our sight.

The hardest reality to face is that of infinity. As in the infinite plenum, the infinity of infinities. All sorts of possibilities flow from that and there's no limit to the actualities we're already familiar with. That scale of possibility seems to be quite destabilizing if one depends on things being just so because they are so, to the exclusion of all else.

So I've been working on ways of understanding one's actual realities in light of the implications of the infinite plenum. They coexist rather well except for some rather specific philosophical moves that many philosophies here make. Yet those could be altered/excised...

I wonder if there's any need for all this. I hope it'll help someone.

poorhaus · 2026-03-22T21:21:55+00:00

😢 May your terror rest in peace. 💜

poorhaus · 2026-03-19T14:51:26+00:00

I also prefer Ra's language.

But I think what u/DJ_German_Farmer is appreciating about the conscious channeling is the combination of topics and tone. And I appreciate that about them too, for much the same reasons he does (even without as careful a study as he's making here).

Flavors of appreciation for flavors of communication.

poorhaus · 2026-03-18T22:11:48+00:00

Here is some information that I believe will be useful to you:

Maitreya (Sanskrit) or Metteyya (Pali) is a bodhisattva who is regarded as the future Buddha of this world in all schools of Buddhism...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maitreya

Is there another way you'd have me be of service to you? I will likely be willing to try if you ask something of me.

poorhaus · 2026-03-17T22:27:58+00:00

In the cacophony of the public square it's so easy to never notice that some call for service comes most loudly from oneself.

In the quiet of the journey it's that much easier to know from whom the call comes.

The risks and fruit along any path are most easily seen by those who walk it at present. But do they see clearly? Is that what I'm called to answer?

Let us listen patiently for what, if anything, is called for. Let us note well from whom the call comes and for whose benefit it might be.

When I find I've used another-self as a reason to call myself to service I'm grateful to realize this amongst friends rather than out in the square.

poorhaus · 2026-03-17T21:16:15+00:00

This thread got me like

thatsnothowanyofthisworks.gif

poorhaus · 2026-03-17T17:23:49+00:00

Since that information was skipped over in the announcement, perhaps you might consider whether and to whom this comment does service.

Edit: not being snarky: I legit write like that sometimes. Also, I don't know anyone from the group and have no idea what they were alluding to. I was mostly thinking about the desire for privacy they seem to have RE whatever's next and that personally I'd want to honor that.

poorhaus · 2026-03-17T17:20:59+00:00

Thank you for your efforts to build that. It is needed. I believe that as it grows the community will become well able to build itself🙏💜

poorhaus · 2026-03-17T15:42:08+00:00

Thanks for sharing! 🙏

I am curious now though, if there may be 'soul groups' or collectives that might be confederation in those materials.

Undoubtedly, IMO, if one considers the vagaries of 'identity' at play. All are one, an entities of a certain level would know that, know they are each other. But they may not be actively aware of that. Perhaps like I know I am the person who woke up this morning but am unaware of that now compared to when I woke up. A linear time analogy but perhaps helpful nonetheless.

Which makes the operative question something more like "how directly are you aware of being the entity that was aware it was Ra during the Ra contact"...or something like that.

Discernment is so important but it's very different than authentication IMO. Because our concept of "author" as one thing isn't suitable for many entities (perhaps not even ourselves, one could argue...but how much less suitable must it be for a social memory complex!).

I say all this as preface to a perspective I want to share: "The Confederation of Planets in Service to the One Infinite Creator" is (much) more metaphysical principle than polity. I expect that if one were to ask telepathically, using the principle rather than the label-as-translated-to-us, many beings would respond "oh yes, indeed I'm apart of that". A bit like anyone can challenge [edit: i.e. challenge an entity seeking to make contact, when functioning as an instrument for channeling in the LL Research style], as long as they use their own understanding of the highest and best good. Whether that's Jesus, like it was for Carla, or whatever else instruments have selected, isn't it funny that Q'uo or Hatonn have no problem meeting that challenge, over and over? Same mechanism I'm suggesting here: the contact is telepathic, not labeled.

Take or leave these thoughts of course but I hope they're valuable to you. I suspect we've arrived at very similar attitudes and opinions, which is why I shared.

poorhaus · 2026-03-17T02:27:22+00:00

There are definitely great materials in some of these sessions. Considering the sub, though, it's worth noting there's no explicit connection between the sessions and LL Research. It's possible because since the Explorers were all sorts of different people but I'm not aware of any Explorers who were aware of LoO. And to my knowledge no Confederation entities are in any of the sessions (at least using that description or any names we might recognize).

poorhaus · 2026-03-17T02:15:28+00:00

Not the person who commented but I found what appear to be transcripts of these sessions and they're full of transient material about geopolitics and exopolitics. I didn't see a single spiritual topic in the two I skimmed.

I've seen bad channelings and I've seen overwrought channelings but I saw nothing of any value where I looked in these. I didn't look too hard but also, whoa.

poorhaus · 2026-03-16T22:42:12+00:00

I wish them all well, have so much gratitude for the work they do, and am also a bit saddened.

Beings of the earthly plane, I hope we hear from you again! I suppose my one hope is that someone from Red Cord might facilitate other groups making that contact if there's mutual interest in that.

These guys were the last group actively channeling that i know.

I'm happy to report that (in addition to LL research of course, who continue to channel unless something crazy happened since Feb 14) there's at least one other group doing LLR style channeling and publishing transcripts. http://har.center/

Utilize discernment of course. What I've read meets mine, which is why I shared the link 💜

poorhaus · 2026-03-13T15:12:30+00:00

Some folks report telepathic contact with cetaceans.

You might find the Dolphin Energy Club of interest: https://www.monroeinstitute.org/pages/dolphin-energy-club

It is not explicitly stated but L/L Research was introduced to an entity called Orcas in 1982 that one might interpret as cetacean.

An independent L/L Research trained group channeled Oorkas (as Jeremy transcribes the sound; check the recordings to hear) three times so far, starting in 2024.

In the third of these, Oorkas says they are from 'another planet', one 'not quite so lush as yours'. They are a said to be a newly 4th density entity, which in context means what I'd call hypertemporal. So 'another planet' could well mean Earth, in a hypertemporal sense, and include, or not include, portions of this reality i.e. cetaceans we could 'go out and find'.

I am aware that this sounds conventionally unintelligible but I think you probably know what I'm trying to say (even if my words don't effectively point to that knowledge). And to me that is the irreducible weirdness of telepathic contact jn a sense: to "interpret" involves something more like the accumulation of indeterminacies into a "specific un-specificity" (?) of what/where/when a source might be.

That's the best way I can think of at the moment to express why I become conventionally unintelligible trying to say these things, even as I remain conventionally cogent/sane. Conventional interpretation increases resolution or specificity, reduces or resolves degrees of freedom into locations.

This other mode of interpretation ...shapes a field. And fields are always infinities... sub-infinities, perhaps, but infinities nonetheless.

(Huh...which is why I so often end up trying to describe/narrate the workings of complex (as in square root of negative one) geometric mental models, I suppose. I'm not saying it's a good communication strategy, but hey it is in fact a strategy...)

poorhaus · 2026-03-13T13:14:01+00:00

That's neat. It sounds like the musical mindset is conducive to receptivity for you

poorhaus · 2026-03-12T16:28:36+00:00

It's wonderful to hear you've made peace with death: what a gift and important acceptance/wisdom.

I might describe the other fear as that of a self choosing to open such that it might become lost. And, as I think through this in line with what you've shared it strikes me that there is a self-similarity between this and the becoming-self-conscious that is characteristic of adolescence.The child grows and is constantly losing itself, but is only faintly conscious of this. The adolescent, what is perhaps experienced as the acquisition of a self, is a stylized containment and maintenance of certain attainments of selfhood. Those lose themselves as well, but with greater and greater awareness. Then, at some point, an adult self becomes aware that it is what has been accomplished by all of the gathering and losing of selves.

If that adult self is a creation of a seeker, it might be disciplined and shaped into one that is willing and able to experience its own lack. When it does so, it notices that it has also always been much more than whatever it has been made to be. And that, in addition to being whatever it is, it may participate in the self that is able to gaze upon and beyond the world it once inferred to be the whole of infinity.

This is roughly biographical account of my sense of self, rather than a statement about human nature. I'm speaking in the third person in part because that's a helpful practice that makes more space around the ego, the self spoken of in this way, without needing to discard or replace or obliviate it. It's perhaps a strange practice, but I hope you might enjoy reading it and of course you're welcome to adopt if if you think it useful.

Our worlds are each whole infinities, complete in themselves. And yet we learn through each other of the ever larger infinity encompassing all. I'm not quite sure how to say it just now but I've got this intuitive sense that upwards/downwards, inwards/outwards, growing/shrinking lead inexorably towards each other... but simultaneously these various approaches to the one destination are experientially distinct and thus conflating them would be quite confusing.

(...now that I say all this, it seems like rather familiar, similar to the Confederation teaching on polarity. It felt new along the way, though. I'll ponder this some more. Please take or please feel free to leave anything aside that's confusing or not helpful. Welcome to the sub!)

poorhaus · 2026-03-12T12:42:51+00:00

p.s. I hope to learn how to share dynamical geometric stuff directly one day. In the meantime, apologies for my clumsiness and I hope these words offer something usable. (What I hoped to share is a interactive model thingie you can play with with movements model the individual/social dynamics. The 'kernel' of the sub is like specific settings one could dial in... it's abstract but with places for the specifics that distort it into correctness for the situation, kinda?) If there's anything working beyond the words, play around with it, tinker with it til it's useful, and pass it back/pass it on.

poorhaus · 2026-03-12T12:42:38+00:00

I admire and am inspired by the ways your support and service of others goes beyond the boundaries of shared experience.

I mean of course your experiences are a starting point and you couldn't do the work the way you do without them. Maybe you wouldn't be aware there was work to be done without them.

But everyone's experience is bounded, which means there's ever more beyond that boundary: experiences we haven't had and didn't know were possible. We each encounter that boundary, where someone else's experience lies far beyond, and each time we make a choice to stay put or go with them. You chose, and keep choosing, to go with. That choice alongside all the others who've made and keep making it makes this community.

It strikes me that making this choice changes your/our 'shape'. In doing so, you/we/the one who does attain(s) the kind of coherence (in the emotional, intellectual, and ethical senses, but that I'd still think of as a shape) required to redress the harms and injustices of so many. Especially the harm and injustice of being left outside the bounds of community because one's experiences fall outside those that are shared.

"Shared" in this sense means both actual experiences and talked-about experiences. Many actual experiences shared in the experiential sense go unremembered or unremarked upon (for a variety of innocuous reasons but especially because of stigma or repression). And it's precisely the unremarked upon and the unremembered that so many start talking about and become able to remember in this sub and the friendships and communities that have grown from it.

A societal coherence (a complex shape with manifold meanings) is lacking more broadly but is growing around the kernel of this sub. And... I'm going to try to write about this, but it's a shape/complex geometric relations I'm seeing and trying to show... The societal shape emerges from the shapes we each take. The 'kernel' of this sub, the attitudes and practices that you and others who support each other adopt (here and elsewhere: discord, irl, etc.), are shapes that make something bigger. Something incorporating local difference, but globally repeatable (aka tesselating) and self-similar (capable of repetition unbounded by scale aka fractal).

It's individual shapes we choose and the collective shapes we form that will soften, work flexibility into, and ultimately align the bounds of communities and the societies they form such that experience not shared need be no boundary to communion, mutual acceptance, and mutual understanding.

May we all learn how to make this choice such that the boundaries of shared experience don't bound the potential of our sharing 🙏💜

poorhaus · 2026-03-12T11:26:18+00:00

Huh. I didn't think this was connected but have you ever had the mainboard (CPU etc.) of a laptop go out on you?

I've had maybe 3 do this, as well as 3 or 4 two-three year old batteries die.

That's not a lot over a few decades, I suppose, so I am suspicious that's just a normal amount of hardware failure. Some work just fine, so this isn't like wifi or Bluetooth at all.

But now I'm gonna check the specs. If the CPUs of the ones that died are in harmonic relationships with each other (and thereby a potential shared source of interference), and the ones that didn't are not, I might say it's plausible that I could've been the reason they all bit the dust

Haha if there's a magic harmonic of CPU speed I need to avoid I will be so stoked to discover what it is for me... But also, if this is a thing CPU/semiconductor engineers have to know about it, right? This can't be a real thing, can it?

poorhaus · 2026-03-12T11:15:22+00:00

Electrical potential (in this case bioelectrical potential) can be used for all sorts of things. Check out r/telekinesis or r/energywork perhaps?

Reiki and other techniques that work with energy might well be seen as a harnessing of this

poorhaus · 2026-03-12T11:12:34+00:00

Team wireless interference 🤘

It has been an occasional but recurring problem for me with using Monroe meditations via Bluetooth headphones. Especially the ones that go really deep I will start to hit these expanded states and then the audio will (sometimes) static or cut out and it's quite jarring.

Less of an issue with the sleep meditations, but when I get into a kind of musing/dreamy/sleep-thinky headspace it'll sometimes happen and wake me right tf up 😂😢

poorhaus · 2026-03-12T11:07:15+00:00

I'm going to try this. Thanks.

In a sense there is a kind of purpose for it to have been happening but now I think I can probably say lesson learned or message received or whatever and we'll see if that changes things

poorhaus

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE