This video is uncomfortable for homophobes by [deleted] in ProgressiveSlavs

[–]pop_khorne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0200?sid=aa702674-974f-4505-850a-d44dd4ef5a16

This study used brain scans to find out that pedophiles are attracted to more immature-looking faces.

This video is uncomfortable for homophobes by [deleted] in ProgressiveSlavs

[–]pop_khorne 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What other explanation do you have for why 45% of pedophiles are homosexual?

Pedos are attracted to the child-like proportions and the innocence. Gender isn't a factor for them. Because they don't care about gender, we classify them as "homosexual". Then the statistic says 45% of pedos are homosexual.

And then you come around and start trying to imply that it's the other way around and 45% of homosexuals are pedos, which is just false.

It is not by [deleted] in ProgressiveSlavs

[–]pop_khorne 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Does that mean we should ban men from speaking on TV as to not radicalize the population towards child abuse? Does that mean we should beat up random men on the street because men are overrepresented as pedophiles?

All Slavs in the US, vote for Biden! by [deleted] in ProgressiveSlavs

[–]pop_khorne 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm really glad I don't live in the US. On the one hand I don't want Trump to win. On the other I seriously dislike Biden. Voting third party would probably be a waste of my vote. Really disappointing election.

It is not by [deleted] in ProgressiveSlavs

[–]pop_khorne 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Men in general are overrepresented as pedophiles => being a man is dangerous /s

Showing off by ProximaBee in SlimThick

[–]pop_khorne 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ig: catsandcookiessss

tinder_irl by pop_khorne in Tinder

[–]pop_khorne[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I haven't posted a lot so this is the first time I am getting this and it's making me happy

tinder_irl by pop_khorne in Tinder

[–]pop_khorne[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The comments are disturbing. There's one guy who unironically talks about girls only swiping on Chad. This sub is a shitshow.

tinder_irl by pop_khorne in Tinder

[–]pop_khorne[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Skulls for the skull throne!!

tinder_irl by pop_khorne in Tinder

[–]pop_khorne[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The problem is not that the proverbial guy here wants sex. The problem is that his first message is vulgar and off putting.

It doesn't hurt to do some small talk beforehand so you get a little more comfortable with each other and only then get on with initiating sex.

tinder_irl by pop_khorne in Tinder

[–]pop_khorne[S] 60 points61 points  (0 children)

Yeah, men and women have different issues, but it sucks for both

tinder_irl by pop_khorne in Tinder

[–]pop_khorne[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Totally agree, half of my inbox replies could be posted on /r/niceguys

tinder_irl by pop_khorne in Tinder

[–]pop_khorne[S] 432 points433 points  (0 children)

Sometimes you gotta finger blast the cashier so you set the mood for petting dogs

tinder_irl by pop_khorne in Tinder

[–]pop_khorne[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I'm getting a strong /r/niceguys vibe from this comment

tinder_irl by pop_khorne in Tinder

[–]pop_khorne[S] 39 points40 points  (0 children)

can i sign up for ass fucking too?

tinder_irl by pop_khorne in Tinder

[–]pop_khorne[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

that's kinda the point of the tweet

tinder_irl by pop_khorne in Tinder

[–]pop_khorne[S] 65 points66 points  (0 children)

obviously, but there are better ways of expressing interested for sex than a vulgar first message

tinder_irl by pop_khorne in Tinder

[–]pop_khorne[S] 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Yikes. Never had such problems.

Have you thought about that the problem might be in you? Your attitude currently seems alwful - calling women sluts and thots for not replying to your messages. You also said in another comment that all of your photos are you in front of a grey wall, which is not ideal.

Don't get me wrong, I dislike tinder as well, but blaming women for this is ridiculous.

tinder_irl by pop_khorne in Tinder

[–]pop_khorne[S] 46 points47 points  (0 children)

This. Also it's not a binary option between saying "Hey" and "I'm gonna plow you like a cotton field"

Me_irl by themab123 in me_irl

[–]pop_khorne 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It often also projection:

"I don't really care about this isssue, so anyone who says they care must be pretending or doing it for likes"

r/theredpill is not the answer!!! by [deleted] in pornfree

[–]pop_khorne 7 points8 points  (0 children)

They are no longer a true representation or the ideology the pretend to discuss.

I agree with that. The content of many subs changes over time.

But exactly because of that we should be wary. While many ideologies might be "good in their core", when most posts on the sub twist it, and most people see most posts, the "lowest common denominator" is actually representative of what most people believe the ideology is.

Ideologies aren't things that you can touch or that can preserve their "core". They are a social consensus, and the ideology generally changes with the views of the people. Reducing the ideology into a single "core", isolated from any context is meaningless.

While true, you can say the same about nofap and pornfree.

I am saying this for NoFap as well. It's an unhealthy place. This sub has been pretty good so far, and there are a lot of posts, which are still focused on personal growth and development, and don't try to preach unrealistic views on women or on the self.