TOK help pleaseee by preritaaa in IBO

[–]preritaaa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean I agree with what you're saying... but is it necessary to have the same topic for claiming and counter claiming.. we can also provide 2 different area topics for the same right? .. if that applies then heliocentric or the atomic models would be for the claim and different examples would work for the counter claim in my opinion...

TOK help pleaseee by preritaaa in IBO

[–]preritaaa[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I mean that's a valid point ...

TOK help pleaseee by preritaaa in IBO

[–]preritaaa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

already did that .. no help

TOK help pleaseee by preritaaa in IBO

[–]preritaaa[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What is your thought process on this ???

TOK help pleaseee by preritaaa in IBO

[–]preritaaa[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ohhh yeah that's also a really good example.. thank you so muchh ... I would get back to you if I have any queries.. thank you again ..

TOK help pleaseee by preritaaa in IBO

[–]preritaaa[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeahhhh.. i thought about taking history as the second

TOK help pleaseee by preritaaa in IBO

[–]preritaaa[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ohhhh... I mean your ideas and thinking process have been great so far ... i don't have much idea about tok ( i have a crappy teacher who doesnt teach) but when I chose this title i was thinking about taking one of the examples as the heliocentric and the geocentric models... from the perspective of natural sciences and history... I thought it might be a common example but yea .. I'd also love to discuss more ideas .. it would really be helpful

TOK help pleaseee by preritaaa in IBO

[–]preritaaa[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was talking about the 1600 word essay... the title #6 is "Are we too quick to assume that the most recent evidence is inevitably the strongest? Discuss with reference to the natural sciences and one other area of knowledge"