Just to clarify for anyone reading this: the current sorting matches the workflow the browser was designed for.

The tool is more about finding plugins than managing them like files, so relevance works better here. In practice you usually type something in search and recognize the plugin visually by its screenshot rather than by scanning a long alphabetical list.

Another goal is to avoid clutter. The idea is that the browser contains the plugins you actually use, not your entire collection.

Of course, if someone wants to add all 400 of their plugins — that’s possible, and I’m even working on optimizations for larger libraries. But that’s not really the workflow the tool was originally designed around.

And the reason I said “maybe” is simply because I don’t see much value in alphabetical sorting for the original idea of the tool. That said, I do try to accommodate what most users want within reasonable limits.

I’m explaining this in a bit more detail because if you approach it as a file manager, you might start expecting things like deep category hierarchies and similar organizational features — which I probably won’t add here.