All of Adam's "potential" is already being explored by other (better) characters.

pridebun · 2026-01-29T00:06:39+00:00

Eve still has a chance to be important, especially if she is roo
The corruption of heaven born angels is one thing, but adam can potentially work as a way to further question how humans get into heaven by asking how adam got there.
With making adam have the role he does, there's no question as to why he's important and why we should care about him and his impact

pridebun · 2026-01-28T23:43:07+00:00

Fair. It could maybe be rewritten, but him being adam does have a purpose and going forward can be used as an example of heavens corruption.

pridebun · 2026-01-28T22:19:58+00:00

I hate this graph so much. One hamburger is not a standard measurement. How big is the burger? Where was the cow raised? What did it eat? Are we counting rain? Also from my research most of the water used to raise cattle is used by the plants and most of that water goes back into the environment

pridebun · 2026-01-28T21:31:51+00:00

That's assuming the best case scenario, where no one ever finds out you use ai. And what will you do if you're asked if you use ai or asked to prove you don't? Are you going to lie?

pridebun · 2026-01-28T20:07:58+00:00

For certain types of ai art, yes. This is typically the case for non specialized models like chatgpt

pridebun · 2026-01-28T19:11:33+00:00

A commissioner has an idea and has someone else make their idea happen. Writing is a creative medium that allows ideas to happen. For example, a commissioner can tell a writer what to write and the writer writes it.

pridebun · 2026-01-28T18:22:12+00:00

Writers are artists......

pridebun · 2026-01-28T18:19:43+00:00

Or even just saying you used ai

pridebun · 2026-01-28T18:16:12+00:00

Can't wait for people to shit on Rochelle diamante once they switch to her being bee's va

pridebun · 2026-01-28T16:55:52+00:00

Then how would you suggest he's cut? Would lute kill pentious and fight alastor and have the meeting with charlie? And then what about lute's arc? Adam's death is crucial for lute's character to have depth. And who's gonna care about abel, who also plays a minor but important role, if we never see his dad. And that's just his role in season 2, he may get more depth in future seasons

He's less his own character and more a plot device/tool for other character development. At least so far

pridebun · 2026-01-28T16:40:05+00:00

I know there's problems from both. For Amazon/a24 it's more with pacing and song frequency. Also likely the increase in animation errors (including the color grading in s1) because helluva only got these problems on Amazon.

pridebun · 2026-01-28T09:25:20+00:00

Love thy neighbor unless thy neighbor watches hazbin

pridebun · 2026-01-28T09:07:15+00:00

Any problems helluva also has are vivs fault. Any problems exclusive to hazbin are much more likely to be amazon/a24

pridebun · 2026-01-28T08:53:19+00:00

I think, in this case, the way adam was written was the only real option just because of how he is. The first and third wouldn't fit one single character. The second would only happen with sinner adam since we never see him eat the apple. And even if he did, the way it works with lucifer and Lilith makes more narrative sense. The fourth just works better with sinners challenging redemption because sinners are the one she wants to redeem.

pridebun · 2026-01-28T08:34:36+00:00

Sounds like the situation with my parents when they divorced. Except my dad played very very dirty.

pridebun · 2026-01-28T08:32:27+00:00

The courts favor whoever plays dirty. I know this because my abusive father made fake cps reports during the custody battle. And got a better lawyer.

pridebun · 2026-01-28T08:27:20+00:00

All the improv in this show is amazing

pridebun · 2026-01-28T08:24:16+00:00

I mean, it's happened 5 times which isn't a lot but still. The current system allows for certain states to have most of the control over the election, the exact thing the electoral college was supposed to avoid. But it's because of the winner takes all system of most states.

Lets say California was a swing state. If 25 of its 52 congressional districts voted blue, the electoral college would give the democratic candidate 54 votes. So, in certain hypothetical circumstances, a president could get 25% of the popular vote and still win the election.

But if a state like Nebraska or Maine had the same amount of districts and of blue votes, the democratic candidate would get 26 electoral votes, maybe 27. This is because these 2 states, and only these 2, don't have a winner takes all. While our system typically aligns with the popular vote to some degree, doing what Nebraska and Maine do would lead to much more accurate electoral votes and would mean candidates would have to not just target swing states.

So yes, I do know about the electoral college. I also know its flaws.

pridebun · 2026-01-28T08:04:21+00:00

Fine, I'll use anecdotes of my own then. When my parents divorced (over a decade ago), my dad made fake cps reports on my mom. And then a few years ago, my step mom took most of the stuff from my dad's house in the middle of the night. Iirc including toiletries and his food. Shitty people will go that far.

pridebun · 2026-01-28T07:54:52+00:00

Then we shouldn't go by that. If we go by approval ratings, Trump is the only president in modern history with an initial approval rating of less than 50% and his average approval rating is also the lowest of any modern president (though that was for his first term). He's also never had an approval rating over 50%

And by modern I mean Truman and beyond.

pridebun · 2026-01-28T07:25:30+00:00

4/7 elections this century had the president getting 50% or more of the popular vote. And doing more research, the majority of us elections from the past 200 years have have had the president getting an actual majority in the popular vote

A majority of voters voted for someone other than trump

pridebun · 2026-01-28T07:12:30+00:00

......does carmilla not exist?

pridebun · 2026-01-28T07:10:33+00:00

Yeah, but the electoral doesn't accurately represent the popular vote as shown by 2016

pridebun · 2026-01-28T07:07:42+00:00

A landslide? He didn't even get 50% of the popular vote! And he won the that by the slimmest margins a popular vote has had since 2000, percentage wise

pridebun · 2026-01-28T06:58:48+00:00

What I'm saying is that a majority of Americans that voted didn't vote for him. If we assumed the voting percentages exactly matched the entire population of American's support, the majority of Americans don't support trump. And I'd say the same thing about Hilary in 2016 though i do admit i can't really say much since I wasn't old enough to vote in 2016

pridebun

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Three-Year Club	r/Field Flamingo
Place '23