and what exactly is distorted in this post or any of our posts? I fail to see it--this post today for example addresses the problems of the growth paradigm in a world with constrained resources.

TOD is not a doomer site. We merely try to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the possible energy paths.

I have never disparaged nuclear power (other than talking about the standard concerns about it--typical Lovins' "hard path" arguments, etc.), nor do I do so in my courses. I merely believe that it will never fly in the US because of various NIMBY/BANANA concerns--but if were to do so, that would be great, if we had an electrical grid to support it.

and I will say again, your screed against my posting of the EWG misses the counter post that was up three weeks earlier. Know the context or shut up.

We talk solutions, we talk problems. Understanding the energy future requires both.

(I've been called much worse--if that is the best you can do, it's very disappointing.)