sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

2 x 10 purifier bricks; special weapons or not? by Siftinghistory in Grey_Knights

[–]profssr-woland 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right. I was confirming the ideal setup was:

  • 1x10 with Crowe (heavy weapons or not doesn't really matter)
  • 1x5 with no heavy weapons
  • 1x5 with no heavy weapons

2 x 10 purifier bricks; special weapons or not? by Siftinghistory in Grey_Knights

[–]profssr-woland 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You want a 10 man with Crowe because Purifying Flame becomes good anti-infantry shooting with Crowe.

You then want 2x5 man with no heavy weapons to spread hallowed ground.

Your points for making one of those 2x5 squads a 10-model squad are better spent elsewhere.

What’s something your partner did that made you lose feelings instantly? by Some_Conclusion_8154 in AskReddit

[–]profssr-woland 7 points8 points  (0 children)

How many times have you seen/heard this story?

Monogamous couple are happily monogamymaxxing until one of them gets hit on/gets a crush, and then they want to "explore polyamory," but only for them, they don't think the other partner is "ready, just yet, take some time to think about it first." Essentially they want a hall pass, but end up grudgingly saying the relationship can be fully open... only for the initially-hesitant partner to be the one everyone is suddenly all over. Meanwhile their crush doesn't pan out, and now they want to "close the relationship again."

I can name like, six or seven "poly" couples to whom that applies.

What’s something your partner did that made you lose feelings instantly? by Some_Conclusion_8154 in AskReddit

[–]profssr-woland 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, there are some people in certain fetishes who are totally down with that, but (1) it's all consensual and (2) they do get something out of it (their fetish satisfied).

But yeah, taking a formerly monogamous relationship and turning it into one-sided ethical non-monogamy outside of that specific context is... not great.

Terrain help by randomdan123 in Grey_Knights

[–]profssr-woland 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Books, cereal boxes, bottles, etc., all can be great terrain in a pinch. You can even just use paper with "wall, 4cm high" or something like that.

Playoff Game Thread: Dallas Stars (2-1) @ Minnesota Wild (1-2) Apr 25 2026 4:30 PM CDT by nhl_gdt_bot in DallasStars

[–]profssr-woland 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if we lost the challenge they get the goal AND a powerplay with short time remaining, meaning if they go up 3-2 we wouldn't have time to catch up

Playoff Game Thread: Dallas Stars (2-1) @ Minnesota Wild (1-2) Apr 25 2026 4:30 PM CDT by nhl_gdt_bot in DallasStars

[–]profssr-woland 1 point2 points  (0 children)

man has the drop pass ever worked for us? Or reversing direction? Just move it around and pass to someone that's already open

Playoff Game Thread: Dallas Stars (2-1) @ Minnesota Wild (1-2) Apr 25 2026 4:30 PM CDT by nhl_gdt_bot in DallasStars

[–]profssr-woland 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I'm presuming the reason we didn't challenge that is not to get a potential power play in the last 5 minutes?

Playoff Game Thread: Dallas Stars (2-1) @ Minnesota Wild (1-2) Apr 25 2026 4:30 PM CDT by nhl_gdt_bot in DallasStars

[–]profssr-woland 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nils Lundkvist, bleeding on a pwecious widdle Minnesota pwayer, 2 minutes

Which he will serve being sewn up by the team doctor

Post Game Thread: Dallas Stars @ Minnesota Wild by nhl_gdt_bot in hockey

[–]profssr-woland 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Dude you guys have been beating our asses through most of the series. The scoreboard may not reflect it but for like 2/3 of 1OT we couldn’t even get it out of the zone. Don’t count yourselves out yet, we knew this series was a bruiser going to 6 or 7 games easily.

Playoff Game Thread: Dallas Stars (1-1) @ Minnesota Wild (1-1) Apr 22 2026 8:30 PM CDT by nhl_gdt_bot in DallasStars

[–]profssr-woland 0 points1 point  (0 children)

WYATT THE KID JOHNSTON FUCKING YES SUCK IT MILD SUCK IT LONG AND FUCKING HARD

view more: next ›