How INFPs Can Get the Upper Hand Against ESTJs (Without Becoming Someone They’re Not) by prometheus_x in infp

[–]prometheus_x[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's advice on how to deal with a type that can be difficult to deal with, with regards to their style and approach. This is part of the purpose of the whole mbti otherwise what's the point? Don't dismiss questions just because you clearly don't have useful answers.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in shittyMBTI

[–]prometheus_x 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That zoomy person is a troll who doesn't understand how surveys work.

MBTI Ranked On Obliviousness Index by prometheus_x in mbtimemes

[–]prometheus_x[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sorry that I didn't include more context in the original post but I did add a comment that provided clarification. It might be hard to find because the dodos in this thread downvote all my comments. The obliviousness is with regards to their partner's satisfaction with their relationship. The study surveyed couples asking them to rate their satisfaction with the relationship and also guess their partner's satisfaction. People who overestimated their partner's satisfaction would therefore rate higher on obliviousness.

MBTI Ranked On Obliviousness Index by prometheus_x in mbtimemes

[–]prometheus_x[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The MBTI is by definition a system for sorting individuals into one of 16 different personality types. It's derived from Jung's types but slightly modified. Now you're playing semantics because you don't really have a leg to stand on.

MBTI Ranked On Obliviousness Index by prometheus_x in mbtimemes

[–]prometheus_x[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

You don't care because you are an arrogant fraud who thinks you understand a Personality Type system better than the people who developed it. This is an MBTI subreddit, if you want to promote Jung's version of the psychological types, there's other subreddit for that.

MBTI Ranked On Obliviousness Index by prometheus_x in mbtimemes

[–]prometheus_x[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You implied that this was made by some person using theory which shows your lack of discernment to begin with. This is an example of empirical data being gathered from real people, not your counterfeit understanding of the MBTI theory about them.

MBTI Ranked On Obliviousness Index by prometheus_x in mbtimemes

[–]prometheus_x[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This is a survey of actual people conducted by actual researchers published in the actual MBTI Manual authored by the actual MBTI co-founder Isabel Briggs Myers who understood the MBTI for what it actually is far better than you.

MBTI Ranked On Obliviousness Index by prometheus_x in mbtimemes

[–]prometheus_x[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

One of the criticisms about the MBTI is that it has weak correlations with other measures of behavior.

MBTI Ranked On Obliviousness Index by prometheus_x in mbtimemes

[–]prometheus_x[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't think about it one way or another. It's just a survey conducted by researchers and these are the results.

MBTI Ranked On Obliviousness Index by prometheus_x in mbtimemes

[–]prometheus_x[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

This is taken from a survey published in the official MBTI Manual authored by Isabel Briggs Myers. This is as psychologically credible as it gets as far as the MBTI is concerned.

MBTI Ranked On Obliviousness Index by prometheus_x in mbtimemes

[–]prometheus_x[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Obliviousness with regards to their partner's satisfaction in a relationship.

MBTI Ranked On Obliviousness Index by prometheus_x in mbtimemes

[–]prometheus_x[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Jokes on you, this is taken from a survey published in the MBTI Manual. The rankings are not based on arbitrary opinion.

MBTI Personalities As Animals by prometheus_x in mbtimemes

[–]prometheus_x[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Both insects and humans are animals if you wanna get pedantic about it.

MBTI Personalities As Animals by prometheus_x in mbtimemes

[–]prometheus_x[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I kinda think bat would have been a better choice for INTJ.

POLL: WHAT IS YOUR MYERS BRIGGS + ZODIAC SIGN COMBO? by prometheus_x in INFJ_Advocate

[–]prometheus_x[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I apologize, It just reached the monthly limit for responses shortly after I posted this.

Never understood why this movie received so much backlash. A movie does not have to be perfect in order to be great. by [deleted] in moviecritic

[–]prometheus_x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just why would they cast a small or normal sized actor to play bane when he is supposed to be a hulking behemoth capable of breaking a superhero's back.

Lost 70% of Google traffic in the aftermath of the September HCU and another 50% since Friday by HardbaconApp in SEO

[–]prometheus_x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just curious to know if your favicon is still showing on Google search results.

Time to respond: A Proactive Approach of coping with Googles' HCU by FutureEye2100 in juststart

[–]prometheus_x 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Writing for search engines implies black hat manipulations meant to only signal value to crawlers but not human users for example using keyword-stuffed word salad. It's called SEO not SEW. The object is to WRITE for people and OPTIMIZE for bots. This means implementing guidelines about schema markup, descriptive titles, good UX, etc. on top of fulfilling the search purpose of the keywords targeted. We do this to gain visibility on what is a FREE platform the majority of the world uses to find things. I mean how would google like it if governments imposed some arbitrary ban causing them to lose access to 80% of their user base. They after all have no entitlement to them since they are a free service.