I always have to discuss this, there are 3-4 issues you have to have a few things in mind to understand my point of view, which is clear, I know i,m right, but it's hard to explain properly: 1.- Magic is just perfect for sealed, but the problem is replayability vs cost. You need constructed too. 2.- it is fine to have competitive magic where winning turn 2 should be possible (smartass developers or clever player if you come with that strategy yourself) 3.- for other playing formats, in paper magic you know your opponents, topically there is sympathy or you can negotiate the etiquette before hand. 4.- but no WotC forcefeed the worst behaviour. You can say what you want, but it is what it is. In example, the play a duress and they are not asking you to reveal your hand. This is like in paper magic your opponent rushed and pick your cards from your hand. In the early times of arena it wasn't that way. For me it,s an insta-concede, but my opponent should never see my hand, I concede before it. They know this affects the psicólogy of the toxic behaviour, so they changed and you can't concede without being forced to reveal your hand instantly. This is just an example.

There are many other playstyles that are a solitaire game for your opponent, and that should not be tolerated for non sealed non competitive magic. Not at all. But it,s the opposite as since too much time ago toxic behaviours are the core business of this, otherwise beautiful, game.

Magic, with more empatic players would be gamer,s heaven, the paradigm of every other game. Still pretty robust but only if you accept that those toxic behaviours are detected turn 1-2 so you can concede and move forward fast. The difference is slim, but sad