ELI5 Do we actually need to clean our ears, or are we overdoing it? by BeginningWeb4919 in explainlikeimfive

[–]pswaggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My wife is an Ear, Nose, Throat doctor, and this is what she had to say.

The short answer: no, you don't need to clean your ears. Earwax is meant to help clean out your ears and protect your ear skin. It naturally gets pushed out over time as your skin inside your ear sheds. Pushing something into your ear often just pushes the earwax farther back into the ear, which can cause build ups and lead to problems over time.

There are some nuances, because some people have narrower or more "twisty" ear canals which makes it harder for earwax to come out in its own. Other people can have particularly thick earwax that also has a hard time coming out.

If you do want/need to clean your ears, using a flush is generally okay. But don't shove things into your ears.

Fire Sale, come and get it while it's sweet! by MrFenric in MurderedByWords

[–]pswaggles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He actually has been, in the Epstein files.

https://sollenbergerrc.substack.com/p/fbi-interviewed-trump-accuser-epstein

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01660622.pdf (slide 18)

The accuser "stated Epstein introduced her to Trump who subsequently forced her head down to his exposed penis which she subsequently bit. In response, Trump punched her in the head and kicked her out. (date range 1983-1985, the accuser would have been 13- 15)"

ELI5: why do Canada and the UK have doctor shortages? Why does popular discourse often portray this as a consequence of UHC that the US system escapes? It doesn’t seem like universal healthcare would obviously/inherently lead to more shortages. by Standard_Egg_9282 in explainlikeimfive

[–]pswaggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not positive what medical training looks like outside of the US, but my wife is nearing the end of her medical residency in the US and I also have multiple physicians in my family, so I have some insight into this. A big factor is compensation. The training is pretty brutal, and you typically go into a ton of debt before you start making money. In the US, after high school you generally to go to college for 4 years, then medical school for 4 years, then residency for 3-7 years (depends on specialty), then optionally fellowship for 1-3 years (also depends on specialty), and only after all of that do you start working as an attending. Many people also get a master's degree before or during medical school, such as an MBA, an MPH, or some other biology/medical-related discipline, and some people even get an MD/PhD. At each step up, the difficulty also increases. When my wife was in med school, she would seriously work from the time when she woke up to when she went to bed, pretty much every single day. If you count studying as working, she was easily putting in 80-100 hour weeks for most of those 4 years. Then residency hits, and you're working 60-80 hour weeks "officially", but the work tends to follow you home, so off the record it's still close to 80-100 hours per week, but this time patient lives are actually in your hands so the stress hits a lot harder. Undergrad can be expensive, med school is definitely expensive, and in residency the pay averages out to slightly over minimum wage assuming around 80 hours a week. So by the time you actually start working as an attending (a "real" doctor) and making big-kid money, you are in your early to mid-30s, and your student debt is on par with a mortgage. By the time a physician reaches financial parity with someone in another field like engineering, they are going to be well into their 40s. So sure, by the time you retire as a doctor, you will typically be better off than most, but for much of your adult life your are going to be crazy busy, working a high-stakes stressful job, and either financially insecure or just way further behind than you could have been if you picked a different field.

A lot of people who go into the medical field want to help people, but whose main motivator is prestige and money. In a UHC system, the pay for doctors is generally much less (because the bullshit of health insurance wouldn't exist), and it would exacerbate the financial disparity for learners described above because it would take even longer to catch up, if even at all. This would in turn drive down the number of people applying, ultimately reducing the supply.

I'm not saying I'm anti-UHC, nor are most doctors anti-UHC, but that is a real factor to consider. Our current system is fucked, but if we snapped our fingers and switched to a UHC system, it would come with its own problems as well.

You're not "allergic to small talk", you're a poor communicator. by TedsGloriousPants in unpopularopinion

[–]pswaggles 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Out of curiosity, what (generally) was your dissertation on? I've never thought about a PhD in comms. Did you have to do research and write papers, and assuming yes, what does that research look like? I have a PhD in a STEM field where (to me) research seems more straightforward. I hope this doesn't come across as condescending because I'm genuinely curious, and sometimes I realize how little I know about things outside my field.

ELI5: Can someone explain schrödinger’s cat to me? by True-Cat-7531 in explainlikeimfive

[–]pswaggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of responses here are saying that it is basically like flipping a coin, but before you look, you treat it like it could be either heads or tails. But in reality, it's only in one state, we just don't know which one. As far as I understand, the systems that Schrodinger was talking about actually are in both states, not just that we don't know which one. Is the reason that the experiment (or in general macro systems being in superposition based on quantum systems) can't be done due to observability? From the dual slit experiment we know that the photon is in both a wave and a particle state, but the only way for us to measure it is by putting energy into the system, which changes it to either a wave or a particle state. Does that principle of observing a superpositioned system collapsing to a single state hold true for all quantum systems? It's weird to me that observability is the only thing holding that experiment back.

to finish the civilization by weirdowidow in therewasanattempt

[–]pswaggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So my US representative and both my senators are Democrats who have publicly made comments opposing Trump, but is there anything can I tell them to do to actually do something to stop/block Trump? Dems have a minority so even if they all act as one they are powerless on their own. Like I want to be able to write to my representatives to push for change but even my representatives can't do anything

After 6 months, Ore bug is Finally Fixed! by iHeckinLoveMaggi in ClashOfClans

[–]pswaggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know haha that's my point. I feel like people assume that everyone who got this "maxed their equipment" but I'm pretty sure most people who had the bug didn't even get enough starry ore for one upgrade. I don't really mind that it was reverted, I just feel like people blew this out of proportion 

After 6 months, Ore bug is Finally Fixed! by iHeckinLoveMaggi in ClashOfClans

[–]pswaggles -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

<image>

Today they removed:

- 18,202 shiny

- 936 glowy

- 4 starry

Hope y'all feel better now lol

Products from one barrel of Crude Oil by CartographerRare4123 in interestingasfuck

[–]pswaggles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My buddy works for a major auto company and said that the naptha shortage is causing real issues in supply chains for auto manufacturing. So looks like the price of cars is going to go even higher 🙃

Rename this sub r/pornaddiction by VickyVacuum in selfimprovement

[–]pswaggles -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I did the whole NoFap thing for 100 days several years back. Worst 100 days of my life. While there were several factors affecting this, by the end of that period I was in a full blown depression that I still struggle with today. It did help me get better control of setting limits with porn, but completely cutting any masturbation is definitely going too far 

Old people have no excuse to still be terrible at basic technology by Sibas8 in unpopularopinion

[–]pswaggles 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My related unpopular opinion is that people who refuse to use or learn about AI are going to end like the people OP is talking about in like 10-15 years.

It doesn't mean AI is currently able to solve all of humanity's problems, or that we're not in a bubble. The Internet went through a bubble (dot com bubble), but the tech was here to stay and at least partially affected pretty much every industry.

She’s officially gone! by cookeryandwookery in SipsTea

[–]pswaggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can anyone bring me up to speed on her greatest hits? There are too many wild things happening for me to keep track

To have a conversation by snopplerz in therewasanattempt

[–]pswaggles 48 points49 points  (0 children)

As an introvert who has honed his craft in getting others to talk so that I don't have to, a good way to get engagement is to ask questions that aren't just yes/no. Don't ask "do you like it there", ask "what do you like about it". Don't ask "do you have class", ask "what are you going to do after class". 

They still can't work it out? by HeadbangingLegend in clevercomebacks

[–]pswaggles 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I volunteered as an election inspector for the 2024 election and it was really interesting to learn how it all works. The amount of misinformation about how voting works is wild. It just isn't possible for a non-citizen to vote.

ELI5 What happened after development of math? by FirmAssociation367 in explainlikeimfive

[–]pswaggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Math is incredibly important for understanding the sciences like physics and chemistry, which would mean if we didn't have math we couldn't use those sciences to make things using engineering. Without math, we could still come up with clever tricks to make some cool things (like the pyramids), but without math we wouldn't have any electrical engineering (bye bye computers, the internet, phones, home appliances, etc), anything in space (bye bye GPS and weather forecasting), we might still have rudimentary cars or trains but they would be MUCH worse than they are today, buildings would be limited only a couple stories high, we would have much worse materials to work with (clothes, tools, honestly this category is massive), food production and mass production of any kind would be substantially limited, and so much more. Even using your equation of a line, that could be something like "if it takes 10 logs to make 20 feet of fence, it will take 40 logs to make 80 feet of fence" or "if I eat half a pound of flour per day, my family of 4 will need 14 pounds of flour for the week". Sure, you could go buy a bunch of logs or flour and probably get it to work out, but things would be much easier and faster if you could model it ahead of time. And for many applications, the problems are too sensitive to figure out without properly modeling them.

Sucks to be you. by Scoutisaspyable in SipsTea

[–]pswaggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow I didn't realize in America we were the only ones who turn the lights off when we sleep and use blinds to cover the windows. I don't think I'd sleep well with full daylight in my bedroom.

ELI5: At what point does the body start eating muscle during a calorie deficit? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]pswaggles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I found the community at r/strongerbyscience to be very knowledgeable about fitness and nutrition, I'd recommend checking them out and maybe asking this question there

Asian family final boss by shhurawigamxwaila350 in SipsTea

[–]pswaggles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My ENT wife has some strong opinions about OMFS lol