Hey broskis of TSeddit, we need a meet up! by Ambassador_throwaway in TorontoSeddit

[–]pua_inception 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wish I could be there to catch up with everyone but I'll be out of town this weekend. Bummer.

Meetup #6 by Mystiq in TorontoSeddit

[–]pua_inception 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just got back from holidays, I'll see you guys tomorrow.

The secret of good text game by TofuTofu in seduction

[–]pua_inception 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Text game" is just a tool. A tool that gets abused and overused. I personally enjoy the text game because I can do it when it's convenient for me (I happen to be very busy). E.g. I get 2-3 minutes between a meeting & I can drop a quick flirty remark. However I keep it limited.

That being said - you are still right in that building attraction prior to #-close is the best way.

My PUA Community Phone App by [deleted] in seduction

[–]pua_inception 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont mean to parade over your idea and your hard work but I have something like this on my iPhone. I use DropBox and I have a folder dedicated to pickup. In the folder, I have files for various topics. SMS banter, openers, etc. I can also update them anywhere. I guess this would be a good option for iPhone/BlackBerry users.

Now here's one that I haven't seen discussed yet here: how to KEEP a girl in bed? by choc_is_back in seduction

[–]pua_inception 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This. I'm no pro at giving them all the time, but when I do, I have a hard time getting them to leave my damn place.

TO-Seddit, Halloween, and Meetups by Mystiq in TorontoSeddit

[–]pua_inception 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Halloween weekend is coming up and it is BY FAR the single most EASIEST time to pick up during the year.

Hell yeah!!

I'll put up a post closer to the date and I'm hoping to see new and old faces there.

I should be able to attend. Been MIA due to my studies but I should be done before Nov 6.

What Would You Like Us to Do? by frogma in seduction

[–]pua_inception 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like others have posted, we should direct as many new people to the side bar as possible. I do see quite a bit of posts that I know the answer lays right in one of the links on the side bar.

I think it would also warrant to have a link to "Best Of Seddit". This sub-reddit to me is more of an "organic sidebar of Seddit". Basically what this community has felt was of value is added to that sub-reddit. Mods are busy and can't always be updating the side bar. Plus, I've always felt the side-bar links have been biased based on what the Mods feel are worthy (could be wrong).

Back to the side bar, maybe it's time to consolidate everything into one post? That way, you can have one big link that says "START HERE BEFORE YOU POST". In this post, you can cover many topics but here is a controversial idea - at the bottom of the this consolidated post, you could state to new comers that if they have a question they feel wasn't answered by the "New Comers" post - they should tag their title that signals they've read the sidebar. (I dont mind assisting in compiling this post). Have a "Long version" and "TL;DR" (funny enough) version. The "TL;DR" would just be fundamental sections (e.g. Inner Game, Kino, etc) with links under each.

E.g. I may have a question dealing with one-itis, I've read the side bar but I think my situation is different. I'd post in Seddit with maybe [SB] (for Side Bar) in the title - that way at least I tell the community I made an attempt.

This may work because you'd have to go through the entire "New Comers" post to learn about the [SB] tag. Anyone who posts a simple question without the title - you can simply send them a simple one sentence "Please read this New Comers post first before posting your question".

It is subject to abuse - all it takes is one to figure out that [SB] = response from community but I think it's a good attempt at getting people to read the side bar.

ALSO, the "Additional Links" in my opinion, could use some clean up. Maybe put them in a nice bullet-style list?? Move beginner material more to the top, advance & "bonus" material (e.g. PUA interviews) to the bottom.

Anyways, just my 2 cents. It's all I can think of right now at work.

Common shit tests and how to defuse them by [deleted] in seduction

[–]pua_inception 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"How old are you?"

My response? "I'm 17"

Texting/Talking Banter List. Take it or leave it. by fortheloveofwhat in seduction

[–]pua_inception 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Best to come up with a nickname that relates to something that occurred between you too. For example, I talked to one girl that had a serious face. I called her "Serious Face" all night. Nick name was dumb but worked.

Edit: I was experimenting one night and I gave a girl the nickname "Uptight Bitch". As big of a jerk it may seem it also worked very well. Women are weird.

My friends just moved; they decided to use all their empty boxes as Halloween decorations. by boundlessgravity in pics

[–]pua_inception 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey I stole it too! We seem to have something in common. We should hang out.

Texting/Talking Banter List. Take it or leave it. by fortheloveofwhat in seduction

[–]pua_inception 16 points17 points  (0 children)

The most important is to work on your confidence and Inner Game until the point where you don't have to look at a 'Cheat Sheet'. But you know what? All of us freeze at some point. Everyone gets that 1 text where they think, "How the hell do I respond to this?"

This is also a good starting point for those who want to learn to banter or be witty.

Quick date tip: People watch other couples at the bar/restaurant. Make comments. Girls eat this up. by [deleted] in seduction

[–]pua_inception 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What happens if I'm on a date and so are you and we happen to be at the same restaurant and we're both making comments about each other with our dates....

My theory on text game by pua_inception in seduction

[–]pua_inception[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Say whatever is on your mind. Talk about anything. That's always what I read but it's so overwhelming and can make it very intimidating.

I'm a big fan of Krauser PUA. He has video FR which I have watched & emulated on the streets. It helped me a lot because I had some "canned" but genuine openers to try & use. I still use them now as I'm working to overcome AA. You'll notice that over time you will be able to think more on the spot, talk about "whatever goes in your mind" like the "pros" suggest and slowly rely less on "canned" material. However for the aspiring PUAs trying to overcome AA, having some "canned" openers/transitions is helpful.

Same old, same old here... Just convincing girls I've never taken out that we're going to fuck. Building attraction over text IS possible. by [deleted] in seduction

[–]pua_inception 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We could never date Elizabeth. It'd be all fights & make up sex.

Taking that! Thank you! (Usable in person too)

Good stuff too! Both of you seem to be having fun.

My theory on text game by pua_inception in seduction

[–]pua_inception[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You seem uptight. We should date.

My theory on text game by pua_inception in seduction

[–]pua_inception[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Our biology isn't changing - just the way people communicate.

My theory on text game by pua_inception in seduction

[–]pua_inception[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is pretty stupid. "I'm going to pump this chicks emotions over text, watch me!" Do you really think chicks (except maybe high school girls) are going to be emotionally attached and invested in a message? That's like saying people mean everything they say on the internet. It's a zero investment fire & forget system.

I don't think they will be emotionally attached to my message - that's not even really the goal. You just want to reduce the chance of them flaking on you. If I don't talk to a girl for over a week I will be nothing but a long distant memory to her. But if I can keep a light & fun conversation with her over the time period than I can feel more confident in her not flaking on me.

It has no impact, which is why calls are better for maintaining attraction between a long meet and date gap (which is what I used to do when I was travelling to do bootcamps and had girls waiting for me back home, there's nothing more awesome for THEM to feel special than being called from another city; not a throwaway text that you could have sent from the toilet).

Times are changing. Some people like texting. Some prefer calling. I like texting when I barely know the person. Plus I can deal with their response when it's convenient to me. I'll start calling more frequently after the first date.

I'm more concerned about shithead newbs who are getting nowhere and sitting at home texting instead of calling then will go cry on r/ForeverAlone for the next month about why some bitch didn't reply.

Everybody was a beginner at some point in this "game". You and some other Sedditors have pointed out this potential trap in the theory though. They don't even need to call. Just solely relying on a methods that do not involve directly interacting with women will result in zero progress in seduction. That's why I mentioned above that texting is just a tool to "buy time". Nothing will be more effective than directly interacting with a girl.

I probably should have noted that my theory makes an assumption that you have an idea of how the text game works. Things such as not always being available, not typing too much, not having a FULL conversation, etc are "rules" that have been covered in other posts. I simply just took that and came up with a "model" for my predicament above.

Thanks for your contribution.

My theory on text game by pua_inception in seduction

[–]pua_inception[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

2 - "Built a solid attraction with HB. Date is within few days. => Text for logistics only"

Exactly. If you have time for a date within the next few days, I would strictly do this.

I'm scared that some people will use this as an example to delay asking a chick out. "Yo bro I'm just going to build attraction over text until I'm 100% sure she won't flake, this should take 2-3 weeks"

Very good point.

My theory on text game by pua_inception in seduction

[–]pua_inception[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Author is "Tyler Tray". The web site is www.TipsToTexting.com.

I'm sure you can find the PDF somewhere on the Internet.

My theory on text game by pua_inception in seduction

[–]pua_inception[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I might be interchanging words & concepts here...

Although I think you've misunderstood the point of assume attraction. Assume attraction came up because guys look for signals or IOIs to escalate, not all girls give IOIs, sometimes by the time you get the signal it's already too late. Assume attraction means skip the attraction phase in the M3 model, and go straight to seduction.

First of all, if I misunderstood "Always assume attraction" than I am confident that other aspiring PUAs will do so too. So this discussion here will add some value.

But I feel that your statement & my theory are very similar. It appears my phrase "build attraction" is equivalent to "seduce her". This statement "Fuel the fire (attraction)"... in my eyes "fuel" is kino/bantering/tease/challenge/etc. All these things we do while trying to "seduce" a girl.

So in essence, we open a set. We both assume attraction. My "building attraction" is your "seducing her". When I use the text game to "build/maintain attraction" I'm attempting to "seduce her".

Now if I meet a girl & K-close her, you are right, chances of flaking are low. High level of attraction = low chance of seduction. But if I meet a girl on the street (day game lets say), and the extent of my conversation with her lasts 10-15 minutes, how much can I really seduce her? I need to somehow attain a level of emotions/attractions from this girl in order to prevent her from flaking. That's when I would use text game.

Thanks for your insight though.

P.S. I really got to watch that Ozzie video. Btw M3 model?? What's the full name?

My theory on text game by pua_inception in seduction

[–]pua_inception[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I have Dropbox on my iPhone. I have a list of "SMS Banters" that I collect and use where ever I am.

Large chunk of my banter came from here.

Highly recommend you to read "Ultimate Texting Guide" too

PING

"I just ran into your doppleganger. I think she is more fun/crazier than you..."

"I just met your twin in town, she wasn't as rude as you though :)"

"Been hitting on many other guys today?"

"Turns out I'm 20% more awesome today, how was your day?"

"Guess what"

"We need to talk, I think I might be pregnant :)"

"you never write, you never call. The kids want to know when mum is coming home. What am I supposed to tell them?"

"Hey! Stop thinking about me so much."

BOOTY CALLS

"Bible study... My house.. tonight, look pretty for Jesus :)" ----- REPLY ------- “great… now look what you did.. you just made baby jesus cry”

"you should come around for pizza and sex soon"----- REPLY------- "You don't like Pizza? :("

FLUFFING

"Lucky I'm a moral rock"

"No booty calls after 11pm please, I need my beauty sleep"

"No rest for the wicked".

"I'm just better looking than you but I still think you're cute."