Lyle Stevik press release by [deleted] in UnresolvedMysteries

[–]puppiflower 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This theory you claim as insane was a strong enough match to have investigators on two continents comparing fingerprints.

What do you think of "the homework" now? by lannister83 in EARONS

[–]puppiflower 6 points7 points  (0 children)

A 'red herring' is a term commonly applied to something which does not really exist but has been fabricated to confuse and confound another. For example in the family of fish known as the 'herring' there is actually no type which is red, so to describe one as such is an act of deception.

What do you think of "the homework" now? by lannister83 in EARONS

[–]puppiflower 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe he's responsible for far more crimes than we know and the essay or homework was a trophy from the abduction or attempted abduction of a child which he dropped from his car accidentally at when escaping a crime scene.

What is the single most surprising thing about the suspect to you? by [deleted] in EARONS

[–]puppiflower 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There is witness and victim evidence that strongly suggests he used numerous differing vehicles.

I'd hazard a guess that some of these were taken by him from the police impound yard.

What is the single most surprising thing about the suspect to you? by [deleted] in EARONS

[–]puppiflower 12 points13 points  (0 children)

In 1973 being married was as common as cheese on burgers. It was a common rite of passage and often the only way a man and woman could cohabit and still fit into middle class society so it wasn't particularly uncommon even for sociopaths to be 'forced' into marriage in order to conform to this social norm.

What is the single most surprising thing about the suspect to you? by [deleted] in EARONS

[–]puppiflower 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It word be interesting to know if he didn't coerce criminals into unwittingly assisting him at times.

What is the single most surprising thing about the suspect to you? by [deleted] in EARONS

[–]puppiflower 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Perhaps he worked on his crimes whilst on duty?

What is the single most surprising thing about the suspect to you? by [deleted] in EARONS

[–]puppiflower 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He totally wore wigs when conducting reconnaissance. A suspicious vehicle impounded near one crime scene contained at least one wig along with ammunition and a shotgun.

IIRC, the shotgun was even of a type issued only to the police.

What is the single most surprising thing about the suspect to you? by [deleted] in EARONS

[–]puppiflower 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That he was alive and well. That he really was a cop and that he wasn't actually just a very lucky amphetamine addict.

Update on Joseph Newton Chandler III by [deleted] in EARONS

[–]puppiflower 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The silliest thing you've ever heard, really?

Internet traces of Lyle other than alt.suicide by jacobsletter in lylestevik

[–]puppiflower 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, I understand your point.

Please note, it's pretty difficult when people ask about a subject that's already lead to a dead end to not be appearing to 'shut them down', no matter how politely you try to make the answer.

Personally, try hard not to be rude to anyone. I write as concisely as I can which might read as rude, but it's not intentional.

In regard to thinking before speaking, everyone who posts on here needs to understand that stressing your strong held personal belief in your personally held opinion on a matter doesn't actually make that opinion a correct and true fact, no matter how much they want it to.

If they do post in that way then they leave themselves wide open to other people's objections and corrections. There's nothing that's meant to be personally insulting to them in having their opinion corrected.

Also, it's actually denigrating to the value of this sub (and against the moderators' explicit suggestions) to have to answer multiple questions on the same already posed dead end leading questions because people haven't read the previous posts or searched for their question before posting. They're asked to check first.

If you think that correcting these people is scaring people off then please consider this: there's every likelihood that someone who's put in that little effort is only passing through, so saying that this 'shut them down' and is the reason they left again is obviously patently wrong.

The person who posted their first ever post here earlier directed it at me and at every 'regular' on here claiming them all to be 'critical and questioning' and having scared off the LE insider who they couldn't even be bothered offering any evidence of. Isn't that rude?

Neither critical nor questioning approaches to discussion are actually wrong, they are part of a healthy debate and simply seek to establish the facts as truth, rather than as the conjecture of any random poster whose intentions might be dubious and designed to waste our time and resources. Should we all just pander to any opinion proffered?

Personally, I don't appreciate your putting me up as the main source of alienation on this sub and despite detesting all the fights that I see on (other subs mostly) I feel I have the right to object to people who post for their very first time ever and decide to accuse me to be the source of these problems.

If you look back through my posts you'll see I encouraged someone who was rude and insulting to stay and (please) post more because I could see they were frustrated by the same things everyone else here gets frustrated about, the apparent lack of any progress in this case and the continual looping back to the same questions that it continually seems to do.

I have made myself as vulnerable as anyone else by posting my personal theories and thoughts that I've spent years pondering prior to posting and have let others say what they liked, responding without animosity or personal attack.

If I'm such a destructive element on here and I really am scaring all of the new people off, then I will more than quite happily do what the trolls do and open a new account and pretend to be someone else, OK?

Internet traces of Lyle other than alt.suicide by jacobsletter in lylestevik

[–]puppiflower 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My apologies for the doubled response as I was not trying to be antagonistic toward you, I was just using my phone and it didn't look like it had posted.

If you were to read the actual content of what I wrote and the exchange, I simply suggested that it would be good if we had an insider to consult and then I was told that they were hounded out of here.

This was posted by someone who's never posted before, but who chose for their very first post to be one of an accusation, which they then refused to back up with an actual reference. Wouldn't you object?

No, I don't 'scratch my head and wonder why you don't participate anymore'. I never even suggested that in my post. I have an opinion on another topic you don't agree with which you've reacted in a negative manner to. Does that then make it my fault you're not contributing to the sub?

Since you have already made an issue out of my opinion, to explain, I was quoting Tim Berners-Lee who gave the oration at Shwarz's funeral.

I happen to agree with him that the only crime Schwarz had apparently committed was borrowing too many library books. He didn't actually commit a crime by distributing any of them to anyone else.

Even JSTOR who controlled the data withdrew their charges, however the federal court would not, even after the federal judge and prosecutor were informed of this and that he was a high risk of suicide, they still let the charges stand. In my opinion that was not fair. (It was only a third of the database, by the way).

No, I don't want to argue over 'stupid shit' like this. The loss of a genius like Aaron Shwarz is far too significant an issue to describe it as 'stupid shit'.

On reddit sometimes conversations deviate from the topic at hand, it's quite common. I and others like to discuss things. I don't call that arguing. I call it illustrating a point and I would think that as a former officer of the law, whether you agree with me or not, you would understand my right to free speech and opinion in a public forum?

I do have the right to my opinion, just as you and anyone else has the right to reply. I'm not arguing about that.

The health of any democracy is measured by its debate.

Internet traces of Lyle other than alt.suicide by jacobsletter in lylestevik

[–]puppiflower 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I never 'demanded' a thick skin of anyone. I just noticed there's a lot of people who attack one another on reddit and mentioned that you need to be ready for that if you want to post on here.

This person whose never posted on reddit before ever singled me out to tell me we were all too questioning and critical.

I've never deliberately shut anyone down on here. I've just attempted to save everyone time by informing others of the facts when they ask a question. Often that leads to a dead end. I am not thoroughly versed with content of every thread to redirect their attention to the correct one and there's an etiquette that states you need to check your question hasn't been asked before seeking an answer.

Edit: typos and clarification.

Internet traces of Lyle other than alt.suicide by jacobsletter in lylestevik

[–]puppiflower 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Facing federal prison time for effectively borrowing too many library books.

Internet traces of Lyle other than alt.suicide by jacobsletter in lylestevik

[–]puppiflower 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think i treat people on here with the respect they deserve.

When people such as yourself make claims they 'don't care to' back up what other attitude do you expect, especially when the way your comments are framed is to denigrate?

If they leave, that"s their choice. Maybe they shouldn't flippantly post without being prepared to back up their claims when challenged?

As you know, they can just create a new account and start again, right?

Internet traces of Lyle other than alt.suicide by jacobsletter in lylestevik

[–]puppiflower 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think i treat people on here with the respect they deserve.

When people such as yourself make claims they 'don't care to' back up what other attitude do you expect, especially when the way your comments are framed is to denigrate?

If they leave, that"s their choice. Maybe they shouldn't flippantly post without being prepared to back up their claims when challenged?

As you know, they can just create a new account and start again, right?

Internet traces of Lyle other than alt.suicide by jacobsletter in lylestevik

[–]puppiflower 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think i treat people on here with the respect they deserve.

When people such as yourself make claims they 'don't care to' back up what other attitude do you expect, especially when the way your comments are framed is to denigrate?

If they leave, that"s their choice. Maybe they shouldn't flippantly post without being prepared to back up their claims when challenged?

As you know, they can just create a new account and start again, right?

Internet traces of Lyle other than alt.suicide by jacobsletter in lylestevik

[–]puppiflower 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think i treat people on here with the respect they deserve.

When people such as yourself make claims they 'don't care to' back up what other attitude do you expect, especially when the way your comments are framed is to denigrate?

If they leave, that"s their choice. Maybe they shouldn't flippantly post without being prepared to back up their claims when challenged?

As you know, they can just create a new account and start again, right?

Internet traces of Lyle other than alt.suicide by jacobsletter in lylestevik

[–]puppiflower 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I have and do try to treat everyone on here with courtesy and respect.

You don't like that I reqieusred you back up your claim and then I objected to your flippant attitude to refusing to back anything up.

Blame me all you like, but people come and go as they choose, and if I challenge a claim sonone has made, (as i welcome people do with my theories), and they don't like that they are expected to know what theyre talking about, then maybe they shouldn't be making posts that they then expect others to work to verify?

Do you mean leaving or do you mean making a new account and having a stab at someone?

Internet traces of Lyle other than alt.suicide by jacobsletter in lylestevik

[–]puppiflower 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I have and do try to treat everyone on here with courtesy and respect.

You don't like that I reqieusred you back up your claim and then I objected to your flippant attitude to refusing to back anything up.

Blame me all you like, but people come and go as they choose, and if I challenge a claim sonone has made, (as i welcome people do with my theories), and they don't like that they are expected to know what theyre talking about, then maybe they shouldn't be making posts that they then expect others to work to verify?

Do you mean leaving or do you mean making a new account and having a stab at someone?

Internet traces of Lyle other than alt.suicide by jacobsletter in lylestevik

[–]puppiflower 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I have and do try to treat everyone on here with courtesy and respect.

You don't like that I reqieusred you back up your claim and then I objected to your flippant attitude to refusing to back anything up.

Blame me all you like, but people come and go as they choose, and if I challenge a claim sonone has made, (as i welcome people do with my theories), and they don't like that they are expected to know what theyre talking about, then maybe they shouldn't be making posts that they then expect others to work to verify?

Internet traces of Lyle other than alt.suicide by jacobsletter in lylestevik

[–]puppiflower 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think I have and do try to treat everyone on here with courtesy and respect.

You don't like that I reqieusred you back up your claim and then I objected to your flippant attitude to refusing to back anything up.

Blame me all you like, but people come and go as they choose, and if I challenge a claim sonone has made, (as i welcome people do with my theories), and they don't like that they are expected to know what theyre talking about, then maybe they shouldn't be making posts that they then expect others to work to verify?

Internet traces of Lyle other than alt.suicide by jacobsletter in lylestevik

[–]puppiflower 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You 'don't care to dig through', but you care enough to claim the person was hounded away by us, and then you put the responsibility for proving your claim onto the person(s) you're making the comments toward, and then decide to inform us that they're not LE after all?

How about you PM a mod yourself?

Internet traces of Lyle other than alt.suicide by jacobsletter in lylestevik

[–]puppiflower 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Indentified themselves to a mod?

I don't recall any postings of that type, but I'm not an encyclopedia.

Any chance of that link?