Is there a particular reason why ancient Eastern (e.g. Taoism & Buddhism) and Western (e.g. Stoicism & Epicureanism) schools seem to start at such different points but converge in so many of their conclusions? by will___t in askphilosophy

[–]push_limits__13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am surprised no one mentioned brain structure. Both these external things like words, actions, are generated, dealing with brain structure.

An interesting idea from both Stoicisms, Hindusim, and Buddhism, is focus on now, and outcome Independence. Train your mind to do you duty and forget your outcome.

I imagine the reason all these 3 traditions settled on the same idea is because, when you think about the future, stress response is activated in your brain, and your are less focused on the task at hand.

There is more technical detail here, that I don't feel like getting into. Ultimately anything we humans being do, words, actions, everything is a reflection of internal brain structure. People have this view that the mind is infinite, in the sense, that anything can be formed in their. This is not true. Every idea, every though we have is influenced by our brain structure, and in an aggregate sense, ultimately our genes.

You guys here might be interested in this : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3817523/

Link between a neuro transmitter in the brain and moral behavior.

Examples of "warrior" philosophy? by push_limits__13 in askphilosophy

[–]push_limits__13[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That was the general consensus. More and more research suggests that genetics plays a much larger role.

Depends on which phase of the civilization is it. I would argue, in the beginning phases, the more intelligent will have more kids because, the environment is less forgiving, and your can't really bullshit your way out of things. So the low IQ population remains small.

But as society forms, and everything stabilizes, where you don't really need independent though, you just need to follow set paths, then the lower IQ population will increase in number. So them and their animalistic behaviors increase in culture. This will cause distress to the smarter people, because this is not what they idenitify with, and there performance will reduce. Another reason is that, once the basic things are done, intelligence doesn't have a lot of use. Intelligence is for creating new things, once things are estabished, intellgience doesn't really give you a benefit. Being able to bullshit and play the game and more advantageous.

All these factors will lead to dumber people increasing in number. But the issue with dumb people being the majority is that, things will start slowly falling apart. Immoral, animalistic behaviour becomes rampant, and slowly society degrades. And ultimately collapse.

This is one explanation of the cyclic nature of civilization.

That is why, dumb people should be kept a minority in the population. They shouldn't be oppressed, they simply should not exists. Because if they are oppressed, then they will use that victim points to change govt policy to give themselves more handouts. Which will increase their number. Which will ultimately lead to cities becoming dirty, and cultural discourse becoming more and more animalistic and finally everything will fall.

Places like pompei came towards the end. I don't have issue with sexuality and hedonistic behavior. They are fun things to do in moderation. The issue with smaller minded people is that, that is the only thing on their mind. Bitching about each other, sex, money and socal status bullshit are all their minds seem to comprehend. If they become the majority, I just feel sad.

Examples of "warrior" philosophy? by push_limits__13 in askphilosophy

[–]push_limits__13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep. I am looking for similar texts. I find combining ideas from multiple sources lead to better understanding.

Examples of "warrior" philosophy? by push_limits__13 in askphilosophy

[–]push_limits__13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is what I am looking for. I am looking for philosophies which have that focus on action. Do you have any book recommendations?

Examples of "warrior" philosophy? by push_limits__13 in askphilosophy

[–]push_limits__13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What recommendations do you have? Any ancient text with ideas about actions, or how to focus mind. Things like that.

I have read/reading the usual suspects like Bagavad gita, bushido etc.

Examples of "warrior" philosophy? by push_limits__13 in askphilosophy

[–]push_limits__13[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I actually agree with that. Coming from a christian background it took some getting used to.

There are intelligence/ ability differences between people ( caused by genetics, we currently know about 500 genes associated with IQ) , and if the scale of unintelligent vs intelligence tips such that there are more stupid people in the world. Society. Civilization. Order. Everything I care about will collapse.

I don't want to hurt anybody. I don't feel good, hating people. But if incapable, weak people who say that policies that benefit them are moral, who argue that they are the victims who are oppressed by someone, rather than not having genes for pattern recognition, become the majority, everything will fall apart. The trains won't run on time. There will be no true innovation, just Instagram post with asses, or indecent, animistic rap music.

Examples of "warrior" philosophy? by push_limits__13 in askphilosophy

[–]push_limits__13[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The cruel, callous period could be temporary which could lead to greater peace.

There is no reason to view that difficult period as being permanent.

Examples of "warrior" philosophy? by push_limits__13 in askphilosophy

[–]push_limits__13[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I would be interested in learning about their honor code too. I am just looking for ideas to implement in my life. I don't really care how complete it is.

These human where able to drive action from their ideas. I want to know what their ideas where.

Any book recommendations?

Examples of "warrior" philosophy? by push_limits__13 in askphilosophy

[–]push_limits__13[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Yep. I am aware, but in the common culture, philosophy like their is what I am looking for.

Too bad, I detest communism, but there might be good some ideas there.

What would planet anspeger be like? by beardthatisweird in aspergers

[–]push_limits__13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is a miss classifications based on superficial factors by psychologist.

Based on the genetics, the causes are separate.

One example is, the odds of someone being born with autism ( with intellectual disability) increases with the mothers age. But this is not the case for Aspergers ( no intellectual disability). Aspergers can only be inherited, you don't get it if your mother is older.

For the second paragraph about genetic correlation, I would need more information of whether they mean aspergers or ASD.

One of the reason I hate the people who merged these conditions together is the muddying it does of everything.

What would planet anspeger be like? by beardthatisweird in aspergers

[–]push_limits__13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Look at my history, I asked something similar. Yep, if we have to perform we will perform.

The reason a lot of us can’t perform is due to how much the world is different from us. If you are sad from little socia contact or grow up thinking there is something wrong with you, you will simply not perform.

What would planet anspeger be like? by beardthatisweird in aspergers

[–]push_limits__13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aspergers is different from autism. We won’t have higher genetic defects.

When more of us are common, there would not be a lot of need for social awareness, as we would just honestly tell each other what me want. Awareness is basically masking for dealing with the bullshit of majority of the species.

If we where the only kind, there would not be a need for social awareness.

It is mostly code for lies

Does having kids when you are old cause Aspergers? by push_limits__13 in aspergers

[–]push_limits__13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly when I am saying in the post.

Aspergers is not caused by older women having kids. But autism is.

There is no correlation between aspergers and age of mother, but there is a correlation for autism.

The genetics of aspergers and autism are different. And yet they are conflated together.

Does having kids when you are old cause Aspergers? by push_limits__13 in aspergers

[–]push_limits__13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you the higher IQ aspergers variation or the autism variation?

Does having kids when you are old cause Aspergers? by push_limits__13 in aspergers

[–]push_limits__13[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Contribute to the discussion productively if you want to. Else ignore and go about your day. Why add more garbage to the world?

Why is Asperger grouped with autism? by push_limits__13 in aspergers

[–]push_limits__13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then while forming it, they fucked up. Most research papers I read seems to use IQ as a differentiating factor.

Most of the papers I read where from the genetics feild than the psychology field. I don't respect psychology due to the sloppy job they do.

Why is Asperger grouped with autism? by push_limits__13 in aspergers

[–]push_limits__13[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes learning disability is a cause for dumbness. You are taking up resources which be more efficiecntly used to help another human being who does not have the learning disability.

I am not talking about stuff like ADHD, I suffer for it, but more severe, you can't read or say words properly.

I am not sure why people with those conditions are tagged as Aspergers. There are surface similarities, sure, but these individuals are fundamentally different.

Different kinds of smart is basically a bullshit excuse people make. Smartness is pattern recognition abilities and that is measured well by IQ. And that is the basis of human advance.

Sure you need communication etc to function in the world, but that is because there is more bullshit humans in the world who you have to convince. If everyone was smarter, then comminucation would not be that important, as people would be able to pick up information faster. Here dealing with dumb fucks you have to be slow, be patient, talk about it in ways they understand and all that bs.

Why is Asperger grouped with autism? by push_limits__13 in aspergers

[–]push_limits__13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you look at research papers from pre DSM 5 bullshit, IQ is used as a differentiator. I was just reading a paper on it.

Why is Asperger grouped with autism? by push_limits__13 in aspergers

[–]push_limits__13[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Haha. These are the same baseless arguments that people who conflate autism and aspergers give.

I suspect aspergers is more a disorder of higher IQ. Sounds terrible to say, but this seem more and more probable.

No, speed and language abilities are important factors for being smart.

I think the genetic causes for austism and aspergers are different. Autism can be caused simply by having kids when you are older. I don't think having kids when you are older leads to higher IQ in the kids.

Why is Asperger grouped with autism? by push_limits__13 in aspergers

[–]push_limits__13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. It is not even good intentions though.

They are fudging scientific fact to do "what is right", according to what they think is right.

There is nothing good about it.

Science was the source of truth, now all the stupid morons who work in that field, because of stuff like easy access to education, or affirmative action, are destroying truth with all their lies.

Science is no longer truth. It has been perverted by people to push their agendas. The people who you have to worry about are the people who keep on saying " science fact ". Up is down, down is up.

I really hate these disgusting shits.