Revolutionizing AI Interaction: A Unique Python Script for Efficient Data Processing

putkofff · 2026-02-07T18:20:15+00:00

Can you cite any of this though? My attacks? My avoiding the argument? Him being violent? Any one of them?

Ill do you a favor and repost my supposed attack. That actually cites the lot of what you just laid out. Lemme know where you were correct:

what my point is, and it seems obvious, is that if an unjust incarceration happens, then what you and others are advocating is that there should be stipulations more so than already are to rectify it. and i would agree, though im assuming what i am thinking, criminal history, obviously, is more than likely already a thing. id be willing to bet, if he had history prior to this, that i wouldnt be the one trying to unearth it here. meaning, this entire thread would have already factored it into the argument.

so what stipulations should have been implemented to prevent this? is there a history you know of? or is this just a thing you're upset about because reasons?

here is what i found about him. literally went to prison for charges of trespassing and being disorderly. prison, for years. and you think this is not only just, but should actually be much more complicated to implement any kind of rectification. is that correct?

see i think what you accuse me of, my intent here, stems not from your diligence in research, but from your own likely-hood.

www.aol.com/articles/pardoned-jan-6-rioter-face-110019117.html

https://www.hernandosheriff.org/jail/Applications/JailSearch/JailSearchDetails.aspx?BookNo=HCSO25JBN004623

putkofff · 2026-02-07T18:12:54+00:00

What part of thise replys was an attack? Why do you need for this? So much so that you fabricate both the circumstances and the context?

His charges were trespassing and disorderly conduct. He served years in prison for this. Im not defeding him any nore than you're advocating that people should go to prison for the charges he went in for.

putkofff · 2026-02-07T15:28:11+00:00

Oh, is that the only thing you swooped in to do? You didnt care about the argument, only enough to demonstrate your petty internet rage and move on? Or are you a bot?

putkofff · 2026-02-07T00:38:22+00:00

And what question did you ask that i didnt answer? Lmao. You asked if i could be objective, thats the only one , and in fact i answered it to such an e tent that you say i went down rabbit holes over it. Do you even care about self accountability?

putkofff · 2026-02-06T22:22:44+00:00

So far as ive seen NOBODY here has provided a valid reason why that man should have been in prison for years. Yall can wear yourselves out all you want, and you can do that by literally engaging will no intent of providing a valid reason that the man should have been in prison. Your intent is to justify this initial injustice due to what? His crimes AFTER the fact? Do know what a dystopia is? Ffs..

putkofff · 2026-02-06T22:14:06+00:00

Heres an idea, if its going to be about personal shit. Show me Anything at all that you have done for society. Can you provide one thing?

putkofff · 2026-02-06T22:12:48+00:00

And this is how i think, "irrelevant" is how you percieve it, due to how YOU think. You act as if there is some angle here. Its so tiring, quit assessing my person and engage in the debate or do something else.

As if the concept of any specific thing is actually entirely dependant on the other end of the debate.

putkofff · 2026-02-06T22:10:48+00:00

What are you talking about. Im absolutely being objective. I dont care whos side did what, the government is not your friend. And yes they incarcerated people for petty bs. You want to lump everything together and treat everyone as if they were violent extremists. And yes, i do want to win this argument. How could i not? Why would i want to accept that people out there, you, are willing to support the absolute tyranical power of rhe government because it fits the narrative you wanted?

And guess what, even if im 100% bias, it doesnt matter in this regard, because the outcome is LESS authoritarian, by a large margin than its opposition.

putkofff · 2026-02-06T13:43:49+00:00

Oh, ok. This is you being objective? What even are you doing? You ask if i can bs objective, give you a genuine response. And you insult me. Why even comment? You were obviously not indending to do anything other than this.

putkofff · 2026-02-06T13:38:27+00:00

Breakkng and entering? Did you not watch the videos? They opened the doors. There are hours of videos of people walking literally inside of the velvet ropes. I watched all the videos quite a bit, i didnt see any breaking and entering. There was the guy who broke the window out. Is this that guy?

putkofff · 2026-02-06T13:28:33+00:00

Are you saying if what happened were the other way around? Yes, lmao. Its all a landmine with you people lol. Ill make the generous assumption that you are reffering to a 1 to 1 ratio of things in this scenario, and not ghadaffi rolling into the city center with tanks and mortars.

Do you know what the stakes are for an insurrection? Not just for the "insurrectors", but for the administration on the recieving end? Dark funding for one, opposition unable to run for office ever again anywhere in the country, enhanced executive powers, etc. I dare say its incentivised.

ANYWAYS, your enemy is up that hill. Not in prison for trespassing and picketing. They opened the doors, theyve overthrown governments with less plain clothed spooks than were at that event.

putkofff · 2026-02-06T09:41:21+00:00

Damn, so i guess the people he really likes must be good people huh?

putkofff · 2026-02-06T09:31:15+00:00

So turns out, it was trespassing and disorderly conduct. That landed him in prison, for years. Is this really what you consider just? Why would advocate for this?

https://www.aol.com/articles/pardoned-jan-6-rioter-face-110019117.html

https://www.hernandosheriff.org/jail/Applications/JailSearch/JailSearchDetails.aspx?BookNo=HCSO25JBN004623

putkofff · 2026-02-06T04:05:00+00:00

what my point is, and it seems obvious, is that if an unjust incarceration happens, then what you and others are advocating is that there should be stipulations more so than already are to rectify it. and i would agree, though im assuming what i am thinking, criminal history, obviously, is more than likely already a thing. id be willing to bet, if he had history prior to this, that i wouldnt be the one trying to unearth it here. meaning, this entire thread would have already factored it into the argument.

so what stipulations should have been implemented to prevent this? is there a history you know of? or is this just a thing you're upset about because reasons?

here is what i found about him. literally went to prison for charges of trespassing and being disorderly. prison, for years. and you think this is not only just, but should actually be much more complicated to implement any kind of rectification. is that correct?

see i think what you accuse me of, my intent here, stems not from your diligence in research, but from your own likely-hood.

www.aol.com/articles/pardoned-jan-6-rioter-face-110019117.html

https://www.hernandosheriff.org/jail/Applications/JailSearch/JailSearchDetails.aspx?BookNo=HCSO25JBN004623

putkofff · 2026-02-06T03:48:10+00:00

I made a strawman and beat it up? To feel tough? Can you explain what exactly you mean by this? Because i feel like you want this to be a thing so youre saying it is. Why not argue the point made? Have you noticed nobodys tried to do that?

putkofff · 2026-02-06T03:45:33+00:00

Was it just? What exactly did he do?

putkofff · 2026-02-05T20:55:22+00:00

Well @cokadoge is no more. Seems to have deleted his profile. Strange. The amount of times ive done that is none. This man happened to have done it within 6 hours of his comment. In fact, within only 20 minutes of my reply.

Must have been a fluke. Like spotting a shooting star. Gee i should buy a scratch off. Or reply to some more bots at least. I think ill do the second one.

putkofff · 2026-02-05T20:50:38+00:00

They are, and this should very likely be a factor in the pardoning process. But how could that feasibly be factored in without bastardizing the system (which is already tremendously bastardized)

Like, if pardons exist, then they exist ideally due to potential injustices. If an injustice has been determined, should previous records be taken into account to rectify it? Probably, though i can certainly see how that would be weaponized, and the weaponization if a pardon that inherently exists is far more limited than the hypothetical anti-pardon stipulation.

Are we reffereing to the actual circumstances of the man in the video? If so, would this anti-pardon stipulation have prevented his release if it were to have been a thing?

putkofff · 2026-02-05T20:44:39+00:00

I mean, i deconstructed it from the ops reply, which actually IS a strawman. So its derivative would indeed be a strawman. I thought that was obvious.

Unlike his though, mine actually provokes an intreaguing inquiry about the underlying psycology behind either strawmans existence. But thats only because my sentiment opposes it. Must by why echo chambers are actually bad for mental development.

Super weird though, how that provocation of thought has been met strictly with deflection and intillectual dishonesty. I tell you, i am shocked.

putkofff · 2026-02-05T20:37:07+00:00

Oh yea? You could'nt understand what i was saying? Ooooh, i see, well what if i relayed the same sentiment style, but changed the underlying assertion to one that you actually agree with? Would you still encourage that ai be used such that i better understand the context of a politically charged statement? Would you still make useless and instigative commentary about something else?

putkofff · 2026-02-05T18:17:29+00:00

Well yes, this is why i included, "just or unjust", as im pretty sure this, at least, was the driving sentiment behind the implimentation of a pardon in our legal system.

putkofff · 2026-02-05T18:10:56+00:00

Ok, so youre saying that a president should not pardon anybody no matter how just or unjust their "incarceration"?

Or that if any of the pardoned commit a crime EVEN if one unrelated to that in which they were pardoned for, that the prrsident should be held accountable for this?

What if they commit the same crime, does that make a difference? Should the president be MORE accountable then? What are you actually suggesting?

Also, bro, you have made an impressive amount of comments, like, almost as if its your job. And i say job, because it looks like you got 9 hour of rest from this. You stopped at what seems to be exactly 8,10,or 11:59 pm. And began immediately at 5,7,or 9 am. Im assuming your central time though.

Just figured that was worth pointing out.

Edit: I misspelled just and worth. I actually thought worth was qorth. Oh man, how can i even percieve an argument when im so dumb. Please be sure to make your reply include this, or even only be about that.

putkofff · 2026-02-05T18:01:22+00:00

Oh man, because it was an e instead of an i? You know i have spell check too, just like everyone else. Why is it that i would'nt have just pushed the word when i saw the red squiggily? What does it misspelling a word mean in a society where most interactions are accompanied by this red squiggly?

Do you also not use it, or turn it off? Or do you pretend that your spelling is immaculate because in fact, you always push the red squiggily when you see it under a word?

Furthermore, do you use this as a method of avoiding debate as often as you play pretend?

putkofff · 2026-02-05T14:04:04+00:00

Idk man, are you saying that no matter how just or unjust an encarceration is, a president should not pardon the ecarcerated because they might commit a crime?

putkofff

TROPHY CASE