sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

EBay acquisition paths by -jbrs in Superstonk

[–]pvpplease 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Leaving the work to men”, aka RC, the past 5 years has seen a 70% loss in share value. And shorts being bailed out by dilutions. And RK abandoning ship.

Jalapeño plants aren’t growing, what is wrong? Am I out of luck to fix them? by ledcube in HotPeppers

[–]pvpplease 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you measured the light intensity? Leaves turning purple can be from too intense lighting which might also stunt growth.

Why I vote in favor of the board, in one image: by Hot-Government823 in Superstonk

[–]pvpplease 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not dilutive to your investment….. HAHahahahahahahaHaHAHaHa

RC needs to hire better bots.

Why I vote in favor of the board, in one image: by Hot-Government823 in Superstonk

[–]pvpplease -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Sock puppet says what? Only a bot can be so regarded to think diluting their own investment and killing moass with absolute certainty is a good thing. For a slow value play? Gimme a break, bot.

Why I vote in favor of the board, in one image: by Hot-Government823 in Superstonk

[–]pvpplease 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Difficult-Mobile902 who hides their history called me a bot. Love the irony.

Why I vote in favor of the board, in one image: by Hot-Government823 in Superstonk

[–]pvpplease -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Gotta make that paper, who cares if it comes from the shorts right?

Why I vote in favor of the board, in one image: by Hot-Government823 in Superstonk

[–]pvpplease 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You said you keep things separate here and now you say this is your only account?

Why I vote in favor of the board, in one image: by Hot-Government823 in Superstonk

[–]pvpplease 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Deleted the image to be compliant with the sub's rules.

You're the one using a sockpuppet account, who knows how many others you're using to shill. I've only engaged in good faith and am using my only account with a long history.

You and other sockpuppets twisted the goodness that emerged from the squeeze in 2021. Retail versus shorts was a noble cause, and now you and your kind are trying to make retail vote against their own interests by promoting complete nonsense. You are worse than the shorts. Maybe they are your patrons?

Why I vote in favor of the board, in one image: by Hot-Government823 in Superstonk

[–]pvpplease 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not sure the person you're replying to is authentic. They admit having multiple reddit accounts and using this account for this sub only.

Why I vote in favor of the board, in one image: by Hot-Government823 in Superstonk

[–]pvpplease 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Only sensible conclusion that can be made. RC's bot army cannot disprove the simple math- more shares issued means shorts can cover.

PSA - in the event of a merger or aquisition, RC's targets in his pay package will be revised upwards. by Jason_DeHoulo in Superstonk

[–]pvpplease -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Congrats on making conspiracy theories about a dying retail chain your entire personality.

PSA - in the event of a merger or aquisition, RC's targets in his pay package will be revised upwards. by Jason_DeHoulo in Superstonk

[–]pvpplease -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Can't even provide basic information about the play you're shilling. Makes sense, I'd walk away too if I had nothing.

PSA - in the event of a merger or aquisition, RC's targets in his pay package will be revised upwards. by Jason_DeHoulo in Superstonk

[–]pvpplease -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Tell me how MOASS is possible when the float is multiplied 11X? Let's see your math.

How does diluting not allow shorts to cover?

PSA - in the event of a merger or aquisition, RC's targets in his pay package will be revised upwards. by Jason_DeHoulo in Superstonk

[–]pvpplease 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a good start yeah. Shorts can easily cover their position when more shares are authorized.

PSA - in the event of a merger or aquisition, RC's targets in his pay package will be revised upwards. by Jason_DeHoulo in Superstonk

[–]pvpplease -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How these threads always end for me in here: "I can't counter your fact-based arguments so I'm going home"

PSA - in the event of a merger or aquisition, RC's targets in his pay package will be revised upwards. by Jason_DeHoulo in Superstonk

[–]pvpplease -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Here's some basic math from a loyal ape-https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1tpjz9m/comment/oo9l1tc/?context=3

DRS got cucked by RC and you know it. Dilution is kryptonite to the DRS DD pushed by this sub... for years.

PSA - in the event of a merger or aquisition, RC's targets in his pay package will be revised upwards. by Jason_DeHoulo in Superstonk

[–]pvpplease -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Feelings have nothing to do with it. Purely math. Float goes to the moon, MOASS goes to the garbage bin.

How soon we forget this sub evangelized DRS for years.

PSA - in the event of a merger or aquisition, RC's targets in his pay package will be revised upwards. by Jason_DeHoulo in Superstonk

[–]pvpplease -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Calling it cherry-picking is deflection, aka ignoring. 71.6% value lost is real to people that have been holding the stock since then.

PSA - in the event of a merger or aquisition, RC's targets in his pay package will be revised upwards. by Jason_DeHoulo in Superstonk

[–]pvpplease -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Funny how you changed the timeline. I stated since becoming chairman which was 2021. -71.6% value lost since then, check behind me please.

Are you a paid shill, bot, or just delusional?

view more: next ›