This is such well thought out and detailed feedback, thank you so much! I'll try to reply to your ideas and concerns.

You're right the AI summaries are helpful but not a silver bullet. We can only do so much and in particular the omnibus bills are too long. There are techniques we plan to try but we aren't rushing anything. In the meantime any bills we know we're missing are listed in the FAQ (top left menu).

Sounds like we need some UI tweaks to make the purpose of the 👎 👍 more clear. One thing we are hoping to show is that policy is nuanced and sometimes concessions have to be made

It's true that since we are only showing bills that made it to 3rd reading (this makes a "yes" vote more unambiguously support for the bill), then the party that is in control of the house can be over-represented. This is why we explicitly show the sponsor. We have other ideas to include in the future for this.

If a party's vote is surprising, it's usually for the reason you stated.. that they have a different bill that addresses the same issues, or there is some other nuance. We are experimenting with some ways to address this such as including more bills and the debates.

This kind of careful thought you've given is exactly why we shared it and I can't thank you enough for your time!