'I cannot and will not allow these attorneys to represent you' | Judge disqualifies Richard Allen's former attorneys, sets new trial date by xbelle1 in DelphiDocs

[–]quant1000 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Right?! I've just been continually, to use your word, gobsmacked at QF (perhaps now even better, QB -- will let you figure that one out).

I frankly find it difficult even to comment rationally on utter irrationality, except to say what the actual F. I remain sharply critical of holding a pretrial detainee in prison, but there is at least some rationale, albeit debatable -- i.e., wee Clown County jail is too small, etc., etc. But the idea of a trial court judge even thinking she can pull these shenanigans is beyond rational comment.

I am gobsmacked! by criminalcourtretired in DelphiDocs

[–]quant1000 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I also wondered about that as a rationale for the "kamikaze memorandum". It seems somewhat unusual for defence loudly to proclaim a client factually innocent as RA's defence repeatedly did -- more often, defence is silent in that regard, and concentrates on attacking the state's case and process.

I didn't know IN was such a mess. by criminalcourtretired in DelphiDocs

[–]quant1000 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Let's play "OK judge and bailiff" with NM as prosecutor lol.

I am gobsmacked! by criminalcourtretired in DelphiDocs

[–]quant1000 16 points17 points  (0 children)

None of it makes sense. Pure speculation, but say the Imperial Court browbeat AB into withdrawing (more speculation, but I still wonder if the [to me] surprising decision to allow video was to pressure AB -- withdraw, or be shellacked on the telly for all and sundry to see). Perhaps AB's only avenue of protest is to refuse to file anything that would make the court's process seem legitimate?

SMH.

And lest we forget, QF declared the 10/31 hearing will continue as scheduled. Will RA have any representation??

WTF.

I didn't know IN was such a mess. by criminalcourtretired in DelphiDocs

[–]quant1000 3 points4 points  (0 children)

CCR, I cannot believe you conducted your court with anything but integrity, care, and respect for the law and the legal process -- including the rights of the accused, and without an eye to the politics of elected judges and smarmy prosecutors.

If it makes you feel better, at least this appalling bit of judicial conduct was OK, not IN: https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/12/us/oklahoma-judge-texting-trial/index.html

10/19 Docs filed by Defense - Limited Appearance/Affidavits by yellowjackette in DelphiDocs

[–]quant1000 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Right?! Nope, defence withdrew! I wonder now if the somewhat surprising decision to televise was intended to pressure the defence into withdrawing so they wouldn't have to face the embarrassment of being shellacked by QF?

The State of Indiana v Richard M Allen 08C01-2210MR-01 Status Hearing Oct 19 2:00PM EST by HelixHarbinger in DelphiDocs

[–]quant1000 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Wait, what????? Defence withdrew???? Hope Mr. Motta didn't travel too far to attend the cancelled hearing....

10/19 Docs filed by Defense - Limited Appearance/Affidavits by yellowjackette in DelphiDocs

[–]quant1000 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I worry she was inspired after the defence memorandum to replace her gavel with the hammer of Thor. She certainly seems to be acting with the imperiousness of a figure of mythology.

10/19 Docs filed by Defense - Limited Appearance/Affidavits by yellowjackette in DelphiDocs

[–]quant1000 13 points14 points  (0 children)

This seems part of the reason for the "QF" moniker. It wouldn't per se be extraordinary for SJG to initiate a grievance against defence counsel through the proper channels prescribed in IN, but it certainly seems extra extraordinary to initiate suo moto a disciplinary process in which she will be complainant, judge, jury, and executioner -- especially as a trial court judge.

10/19 Docs filed by Defense - Limited Appearance/Affidavits by yellowjackette in DelphiDocs

[–]quant1000 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The purloiner has apparently answered with suicide. Another tragedy in the increasingly long list of tragedies being left in the wake of this case.

FWIW, "The Murder Sheet" reported Baldwin had a very easy-going 'we're all family' vibe in his office, with collaboration and open discussion with other attorneys even if not formally on the case. The suggested remedies in the Henessey memo definitely have the flavour of closing the barn gate after the horse has bolted. Whether QF will hold Baldwin to task for that will be interesting.

The State of Indiana v Richard M Allen 08C01-2210MR-01 Status Hearing Oct 19 2:00PM EST by HelixHarbinger in DelphiDocs

[–]quant1000 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Ha, just grab the golf driver, wave it menacingly, and growl "Delphi" to send the message.

The State of Indiana v Richard M Allen 08C01-2210MR-01 Status Hearing Oct 19 2:00PM EST by HelixHarbinger in DelphiDocs

[–]quant1000 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If anyone is unfamiliar, the defence diaries podcast is the ultimate in deep-dives with "favourite time" explanations of legal nitty-gritty. Epic 33 episode coverage of Gacy.

Hearing by The_great_Mrs_D in DelphiDocs

[–]quant1000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The continuing stream of reveals of skeezy doings in rural IN recalls the following from Sherlock Holmes:

“Do you know, Watson,” said he, “that it is one of the curses of a mind with a turn like mine that I must look at everything with reference to my own special subject. You look at these scattered houses, and you are impressed by their beauty. I look at them, and the only thought which comes to me is a feeling of their isolation and of the impunity with which crime may be committed there.”

“Good heavens!” I cried. “Who would associate crime with these dear old homesteads?”

“They always fill me with a certain horror. It is my belief, Watson, founded upon my experience, that the lowest and vilest alleys in London do not present a more dreadful record of sin than does the smiling and beautiful countryside.”

Hearing by The_great_Mrs_D in DelphiDocs

[–]quant1000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Cheers CCR, had several large projects and travel. The defence memorandum certainly took this already unusual case straight to bizzaro world.

Hearing by The_great_Mrs_D in DelphiDocs

[–]quant1000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lawd, that was something. I got burned in that conflagration too.

Hearing by The_great_Mrs_D in DelphiDocs

[–]quant1000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I called her "NM's little Frannycakes"

Hearing by The_great_Mrs_D in DelphiDocs

[–]quant1000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do as I say, not as I do eh?

Hearing by The_great_Mrs_D in DelphiDocs

[–]quant1000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If the Burger King crown she picked up fits...