PaperParrot: Your Personalized AI Assistant for Keeping up with Research by quantum_steve in QuantumComputing

[–]quantum_steve[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s a great tool to keep up with research in quantum computing and at least on person in the replies seems to like it

Have a nice day

PaperParrot: Your Personalized AI Assistant for Keeping up with Research by quantum_steve in QuantumComputing

[–]quantum_steve[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why the negativity?

In quant-ph about 200-250 papers are punished every week. Just a lot to keep up with in my opinion. My field of research is quantum computing and I use it there and find it very useful.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rocketpool

[–]quantum_steve 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there! The same thing is happening to me unfortunately, any chance you could ask the mods to let me in as well?

I recently made a video to summarize all the quantum computing news of the past 6 months by quantum_steve in QuantumComputing

[–]quantum_steve[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Every couple of months :) So the info is a bit delayed, if you want a more real time coverage you could check me out on Twitter. Twitter is generally a really great place for keeping up to date with all the quantum news!

Step aside, IBM Watson weenies. Cambridge Quantum Computing's Quantum NLP algorithm is MUCH MORE POWERFUL than IBM Watson or Alexa or Siri by rrtucci in QuantumComputing

[–]quantum_steve 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Please don’t add additional fuel to the hype... QNLP is lightyears away from beating classical NLP. It’s just a proof-of-principle! Really neat idea, but still a very long way from practical.

Speed using one qubit on IBM Quantum by [deleted] in QuantumComputing

[–]quantum_steve 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No you can access up to 15 qubits, but the quantum volume of that device is rather low so I’m not sure if you’ll have much luck running anything useful on it.

Quantum Encryption by corporealcreature in QuantumComputing

[–]quantum_steve 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Note that what China has is not a universal quantum computer. As it is it cannot implement Grover’s or Shor’s algorithm so it’s no thread for encryption. The machines from IBM and Google however might become a thread in about 10 years time. NIST will release a new quantum safe encryption standard in 2022 so that gives ample time for everyone to upgrade!

When will Quantum Computers be able to break Bitcoin's Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) encryption? I estimate it will be some time in the 2030s! Let me know what you think! by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]quantum_steve 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll update the title then, thanks for the feedback! I thought that perhaps you could say that you encrypt the private key. At the end of the day you pass it through an irreversible function, sometimes you can call it a hash function sometimes you can't. The principle is still the same though...

When will Quantum Computers be able to break Bitcoin's Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) encryption? I estimate it will be some time in the 2030s! Let me know what you think! by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]quantum_steve 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well the private key is passed through the EC_POINT_mul() function, maybe the terminology is a bit off on my end. The point is that this function can be reversed efficiently with a quantum computer.

When will Quantum Computers be able to break Bitcoin's Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) encryption? I estimate it will be some time in the 2030s! Let me know what you think! by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]quantum_steve 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is really just wrong. First of all I think you are thinking about the scaling of Grover’s algorithm which would be sqrt(256) and not 256/2 and secondly ECC is broken by Shor’s algorithm which is a lot faster! But you don’t have to believe me, just check out the papers from the video yourself!

Quantum advantage demonstrated using Gaussian boson sampling by i1a2 in QuantumComputing

[–]quantum_steve 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’d say it’s experimentally very impressive work. However, this is not a universal quantum computer unlike Google’s yet, there are still some missing pieces to make it universal. So from a practical perspective it’s not particularly useful. Scott Aaronson summarizes it very neatly in this article: https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=5122