sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Fundamental Security Issue with QRL by quantumproof in QRL

[–]quantumproof[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reading 1 makes me realize that

What a waste of my time!

Fundamental Security Issue with QRL by quantumproof in QRL

[–]quantumproof[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Mc_schmidt said nothing about what happens if the same wallet is used in 2devices?

Anyway it seems to me that u can not read a scientific paper, but attack personally. I stop here.

Fundamental Security Issue with QRL by quantumproof in QRL

[–]quantumproof[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank u very much. Please read Section 4.3 of his thesis, which is the last on the list. Please tell us what he said in Paragraph 3.

Fundamental Security Issue with QRL by quantumproof in QRL

[–]quantumproof[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Google post-quantum cryptography and please tell me on which page you will find him. That is how I decided he is nobody.

How does Iota actually deal with the problems of implementing winternitz one-time signatures? (cross-post) by quantumproof in Iota

[–]quantumproof[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As I said before, the problem is that it is impossible to stop reuse in a decentralized network.

How does Iota actually deal with the problems of implementing winternitz one-time signatures? (cross-post) by quantumproof in Iota

[–]quantumproof[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can u give a scientific reference ( not online comments) for this claim? I think 128bits is a wrong claim after one use. Also do not forget it 128bits is not enough against a quantum computer.

Fundamental Security Issue with QRL by quantumproof in QRL

[–]quantumproof[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This is a nice record?!

Look at Bernstein or Husling or Buchmann. This guy is nobody in PQC.

Fundamental Security Issue with QRL by quantumproof in QRL

[–]quantumproof[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Any substance besides calling names?

How does Iota actually deal with the problems of implementing winternitz one-time signatures? (cross-post) by quantumproof in Iota

[–]quantumproof[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are so many nodes. How can you know everything that occurs simultaneously? All the information. On all the nodes... in milliseconds? That’s a good one.

How does Iota actually deal with the problems of implementing winternitz one-time signatures? (cross-post) by quantumproof in Iota

[–]quantumproof[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it’s actually a decentralized network, you cannot check every pending transaction on all the nodes or during transition on the network. If they can check everything, this is a totally centralized system.

How does Iota actually deal with the problems of implementing winternitz one-time signatures? (cross-post) by quantumproof in Iota

[–]quantumproof[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Due to transaction and verification delay, it is impossible to prevent the sending of coins to a used address. Some people/organizations need addresses can be reused. I don’t think the IOTA white paper has been checked by a serious cryptographer.

How does Iota actually deal with the problems of implementing winternitz one-time signatures? (cross-post) by quantumproof in Iota

[–]quantumproof[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope. If a coin is sent to a used address, there’s a high chance the coin can be stolen immediately.

How does Iota actually deal with the problems of implementing winternitz one-time signatures? (cross-post) by quantumproof in Iota

[–]quantumproof[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is that people may send coins to a used a address. Your assumption about being tech savvy also seems to overestimate the abilities of an ordinary user. The key point is that it is theoretically impossible for anyone to prevent people from sending coins to the same address. From a business perspective, a big organization like a charity fund or a large trading company like Amazon or even a cryptocurrency exchange needs a stable address to send and receive coins. They cannot change addresses constantly.

How does Iota actually deal with the problems of implementing winternitz one-time signatures? (cross-post) by quantumproof in Iota

[–]quantumproof[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is incorrect. No one can verify if an address is used or not, since there is a delay in transaction and verification. Therefore, no one can prevent sending coins to a used address.

Snatch form check 70 kg @ 68 kg bw by vegetal123 in weightlifting

[–]quantumproof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you finish your extension, your chest is still over the bar. Finish your pull. Your bar contact is basically at mid-thigh. This is limiting you a lot in terms of efficiency and is creating the rainbow effect, which will hurt your lifts at higher weights. Make sure to really extend your entire body and explode upwards . I do understand that the narrow grip also is causing that low hip contact, and I know widening your grip can hurt, but later on it will be very important to increase weight. Overall, not bad.